Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / InNameOnly

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The 2008 TV adaptation of Series/TheAndromedaStrain had very little to do with the original novel, beyond the basic concept of a deadly contagion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
It\'s been confirmed that it was always intended to be a Silent Hill game, just not a main series one.


* An ongoing [[BrokenBase fandom debate]] revolves around whether ''VideoGame/SilentHill4: The Room'' is such a sequel, as it was originally intended as a separate title. On the one hand, Team Silent did make the game; it was turned into a ''Franchise/SilentHill'' project early in development, and there's no denying the similar concepts and atmosphere. On the other hand, most of the in-depth story connections to the rest of the series were only added later via an [[AllThereInTheManual official Konami website]], in [[NoExportForYou Japanese]], making their canonical value debatable. However, it should be noted that there are numerous direct connections and references to the first three games in the actual in-game story. Examples include the mention that Walter was essentially brainwashed by Dahlia, the main character's landlord being the father of James Sunderland of Silent Hill 2 fame, and the eponymous room having once been occupied by Joseph Schreiber, who's article about the Order can be found and read in Silent Hill 3. On that note, the article from Silent Hill 3 (which can also be read in The Room) describes the Wish House Orphanage and the Water Prison, both of which are major gameplay locations in the Fourth installment.

to:

* An ongoing [[BrokenBase fandom debate]] revolves around whether ''VideoGame/SilentHill4: The Room'' is such a sequel, as it was originally intended as a separate title. sequel. On the one hand, Team Silent did make the game; it was turned into a ''Franchise/SilentHill'' project early in development, game and there's no denying the similar concepts and atmosphere. On the other hand, most of the in-depth story connections to the rest of the series were only added later via an [[AllThereInTheManual official Konami website]], in [[NoExportForYou Japanese]], making their canonical value debatable. However, it should be noted that there are numerous direct connections and references to the first three games in the actual in-game story. Examples include the mention that Walter was essentially brainwashed by Dahlia, the main character's landlord being the father of James Sunderland of Silent Hill 2 fame, and the eponymous room having once been occupied by Joseph Schreiber, who's article about the Order can be found and read in Silent Hill 3. On that note, the article from Silent Hill 3 (which can also be read in The Room) describes the Wish House Orphanage and the Water Prison, both of which are major gameplay locations in the Fourth installment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* When the GameBoy Advance franchise {{Boktai}} finally got a DS port it was almost completely different from the original in every way. 90% of the SpaghettiWestern elements were removed, there was no continuity of plot from the original game series, and most tellingly the game no longer had to be played outside in direct sunlight to access certain abilities (though that one at least is probably for the best). The only major similarity is that the two main characters, Django and Sabata, retain their names and appearances (and even they were renamed in certain localizations) but they both have entirely new backstories and motivations.

to:

* When the GameBoy Advance franchise {{Boktai}} VideoGame/{{Boktai}} finally got a DS port it was almost completely different from the original in every way. 90% of the SpaghettiWestern elements were removed, there was no continuity of plot from the original game series, and most tellingly the game no longer had to be played outside in direct sunlight to access certain abilities (though that one at least is probably for the best). The only major similarity is that the two main characters, Django and Sabata, retain their names and appearances (and even they were renamed in certain localizations) but they both have entirely new backstories and motivations.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
You\'re thinking of a Dolled Up Installment.


* Speaking of which, this was sort of the case with ''VideoGame/SuperMarioBros2''. The game was originally a Japanese game called ''VideoGame/DokiDokiPanic'' with the main characters replaced by more familiar ones for an American release. Most fans of the franchise don't even consider the game cannon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**WordOfGod pretty much confirmed it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
added an example

Added DiffLines:

* Only the 1974 ''[[Emmanuelle]]'' bears any relation to the novel from which it derives its name, and even that movie deviates from the source material in several respects (in the original novel, for instance, Mario is an openly gay man.) The rest of the Emmanuelle movies were just attempts to cash in on the success of the original.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Other than featuring a VTOL-capable combat plane, the 2007 ''{{VideoGame/Warhawk}}'' game has nothing to do with the original, being a ''VideoGame/{{Battlefield}}''-style multiplayer TPS instead of a single-player only, mission-based action game.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the case of {{Atari}}, quite literally. Infogrames bought the name and renamed itself Atari. Literally, it's Atari ''in name only''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Speaking of which, this was sort of the case with ''VideoGame/SuperMarioBros2''. The game was originally a Japanese game called ''Dream Factory'' with the main characters replaced by more familiar ones for an American release. Most fans of the franchise don't even consider the game cannon.

to:

* Speaking of which, this was sort of the case with ''VideoGame/SuperMarioBros2''. The game was originally a Japanese game called ''Dream Factory'' ''VideoGame/DokiDokiPanic'' with the main characters replaced by more familiar ones for an American release. Most fans of the franchise don't even consider the game cannon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Speaking of which, this was sort of the case with ''VideoGame/SuperMarioBros2''. The game was originally a Japanese game called ''Dream Factory'' with the main characters replaced by more familiar ones for an American release. Most fans of the franchise don't even consider the game cannon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Website/PlatypusComix's longest-running series, ''Webcomic/ScrambledEggs'', received inspiration from a juvenile fiction novel titled ''Hello, My Name is Scrambled Eggs'', but the cartoonist says the only similarities the current comic and the novel have are some characters' names and the use of "No kidding!" as a CatchPhrase.

to:

* Website/PlatypusComix's longest-running series, ''Webcomic/ScrambledEggs'', received inspiration from a juvenile fiction novel titled ''Hello, My Name is Scrambled Eggs'', but the cartoonist Peter Paltridge says the only similarities the current comic and the novel have are include some characters' names and the use of "No kidding!" as a CatchPhrase.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The trend over the last decade to produce in-name-only remakes of 1970s-era series has led to new versions of things like ''BionicWoman'', ''{{McCloud}}'' and ''{{Kojak}}'', that tended to port over character names but little else (including the formulas that made the original shows successes). A new in-name-only remake of ''{{Ironside}}'' has been announced for the fall of 2013 as the trend continues.

to:

* The trend over the last decade to produce in-name-only remakes of 1970s-era series has led to new versions of things like ''BionicWoman'', ''{{McCloud}}'' ''Series/BionicWoman'', ''Series/{{McCloud}}'' and ''{{Kojak}}'', ''Series/{{Kojak}}'', that tended to port over character names but little else (including the formulas that made the original shows successes). A new in-name-only remake of ''{{Ironside}}'' ''Series/{{Ironside}}'' has been announced for the fall of 2013 as the trend continues.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The trend over the last decade to produce in-name-only remakes of 1970s-era series has led to new versions of things like ''BionicWoman'', ''{{McCloud}}'' and ''{{Kojak}}'', that tended to port over character names but little else (including the formulas that made the original shows successes). A new in-name-only remake of ''{{Ironside}}'' has been announced for the fall of 2013 as the trend continues.

Added: 416

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The ''Franchise/ResidentEvil'' [[Film/ResidentEvil movies]] got the ''look'' of the games down for the most part. Too bad they threw out the plot, characterization, atmosphere, and everything else that makes the games so enjoyable. The movies should have been called "The [[GodModeSue Amazing Alice's]] [[WaifFu Kung-Fu Adventures]] in {{Zombie|Apocalypse}} [[Film/TheMatrix MatrixLand]]." It would have made much more sense as a title ''and'' pissed off far fewer ''Franchise/ResidentEvil'' fans.
** Which is such a shame, as the first few minutes of the first film really capture the 'feel' of ''Franchise/ResidentEvil'', only to have it immediately thrown away to move out of the mansion and onto the technological underground bunker.

to:

* The ''Franchise/ResidentEvil'' [[Film/ResidentEvil movies]] got the ''look'' of the games down for the most part. Too bad they threw out the plot, characterization, atmosphere, and everything else that makes the games so enjoyable. The movies should have been called "The [[GodModeSue Amazing Alice's]] [[WaifFu Kung-Fu Adventures]] in {{Zombie|Apocalypse}} [[Film/TheMatrix MatrixLand]]." It would have made much more sense as a title ''and'' pissed off far fewer ''Franchise/ResidentEvil'' fans.
fans.
** Which is such a shame, as the first few minutes of the first film really capture the 'feel' of ''Franchise/ResidentEvil'', only to have it immediately thrown away to move out of the mansion and onto the technological underground bunker.
*** The first film may have been originally intended as a prequel to the first game. Everything afterwards deviated more and more into live action ResidentEvil FanFiction staring Alice, the director's MarySue. Even when characters from the games were introduced into the films, they were either foil for Alice (Wesker) or were reduced to becoming Alice's sidekicks (Chris Redfield, Claire Redfield, Leon S. Kennedy).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also at no point are any of the characters ever alone in the dark. They are either with someone else at the time, or they are not in the dark.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/IAmLegend'': The only thing the film and the book have in common is a disease that turns people into monsters. And even then they didn't get it quite right: the infected in the book are traditional vampires (which the book painstakingly comes up with scientific explanations for all their weaknesses: sunlight, aversion to mirrors and holy objects, garlic, staking) who are slow and stupid like zombies, while in the movie they are just hairless, pale cannibals like the monsters from TheDescent. In the new movie it's a virus, but in the old book, it was a type of bacteria. Also, a Caucasian-to-minority RaceLift for the main character, Robert Neville, who is nothing like the Neville of the book. Neville's unique immunity is just something that he was born with, and there are plenty of others who are also immune. The setting was a suburb in a small town, while the movie takes places in a desolated New York city. There is no Ben Cortman character (unless you count the nameless infected leader, and even then he shares nothing in common with the neighbor-turned vampire character from the book). There is no separate faction of intelligent, civilized vampires (maybe because they thought viewing audiences would be dense to understand that concept). The woman that Neville meets does not [[spoiler: turn out to be one of the intelligent vampires and betray him]]. Of course, ''I Am Legend'' isn't TheFilmOfTheBook so much as a remake of ''Film/TheOmegaMan'', which is ''itself'' an InNameOnly adaptation of the book ''Literature/IAmLegend''... Except for the name, of course, and the film gives the meaning of the title an entirely different meaning. Robert Neville is a legend because he developed a cure, while in the book Neville [[spoiler: is a legend because in a world inhabited entirely by vampires, the one normal human that hunts them is the monster. He walks in the daylight, he stalks them while they are sleeping and impales them to leave bloodless corpses behind. It makes him the "human Dracula" of this world]]. The original ending would've given it some connection with the book it was apparently based on, but that was changed too.

to:

* ''Film/IAmLegend'': The only thing the film and the book have in common is a disease that turns people into monsters. And even then they didn't get it quite right: the infected in the book are traditional vampires (which the book painstakingly comes up with scientific explanations for all their weaknesses: sunlight, aversion to mirrors and holy objects, garlic, staking) who are slow and stupid like zombies, while in the movie they are just hairless, pale cannibals like the monsters from TheDescent. In the new movie it's a virus, virus that was developed as a cure for cancer, but in the old book, it was a type of bacteria.bacteria carried by dust storms. Also, a Caucasian-to-minority RaceLift for the main character, Robert Neville, who is nothing like the Neville of the book. While Neville loses his daughter and wife in the film, it's not because of them being infected. Neville's unique immunity is just something that he was born with, and there are plenty of others who are also immune. The setting was a suburb in a small town, while the movie takes places in a desolated New York city. There is no Ben Cortman character (unless you count the nameless infected leader, and even then he shares nothing in common with the Determinator neighbor-turned vampire character from the book). There are no scenes of the infected harassing Neville at home. There is no separate faction of intelligent, civilized vampires (maybe because they thought viewing audiences would be too dense to understand that concept). The woman that Neville meets does not [[spoiler: turn out to be one of the intelligent vampires and betray betrays him]]. Of course, ''I Am Legend'' isn't TheFilmOfTheBook so much as a remake of ''Film/TheOmegaMan'', which is ''itself'' an InNameOnly adaptation of the book ''Literature/IAmLegend''... Except for the name, of course, and the film gives the meaning of the title an entirely different meaning. Robert Neville is a legend because he developed a cure, while in the book Neville [[spoiler: is a legend because in a world inhabited entirely by vampires, the one normal human that hunts them is the monster. He walks in the daylight, he stalks them while they are sleeping and impales them to leave bloodless corpses behind. It makes him the "human Dracula" of this world]]. The original ending would've given it some connection with the book it was apparently based on, but that was changed too.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/IAmLegend'': The original ending would've given it some connection with the book it was apparently based on, but that was changed too... now the only thing they have in common is a disease that turns people into monsters. And even then they didn't get it quite right: the infected in the book are traditional vampires (which the book painstakingly comes up with scientific explanations for all their weaknesses: sunlight, aversion to mirrors and holy objects, garlic, staking) who are slow and stupid like zombies, while in the movie they are just hairless, pale cannibals like the monsters from TheDescent. In the new movie it's a virus, but in the old book, it was a type of bacteria. Also, a Caucasian-to-minority RaceLift for the main character, Robert Neville, who is nothing like the Neville of the book. Neville's unique immunity is just something that he was born with, and there are plenty of others who are also immune. The setting was a suburb in a small town, while the movie takes places in a desolated New York city. There is no Ben Cortman character (unless you count the nameless infected leader, and even then he shares nothing in common with the neighbor-turned vampire character from the book). There is no separate faction of intelligent, civilized vampires (maybe because they thought viewing audiences would be dense to understand that concept). The woman that Neville meets does not [[spoiler: turn out to be one of the intelligent vampires and betray him]]. Of course, ''I Am Legend'' isn't TheFilmOfTheBook so much as a remake of ''Film/TheOmegaMan'', which is ''itself'' an InNameOnly adaptation of the book ''Literature/IAmLegend''... Except for the name, of course, and the film gives the meaning of the title an entirely different meaning. Robert Neville is a legend because he developed a cure, while in the book Neville [[spoiler: is a legend because in a world inhabited entirely by vampires, the one normal human that hunts them is the monster. He walks in the daylight, he stalks them while they are sleeping and impales them to leave bloodless corpses behind. It makes him the "human Dracula" of this world]].

to:

* ''Film/IAmLegend'': The original ending would've given it some connection with the book it was apparently based on, but that was changed too... now the only thing they the film and the book have in common is a disease that turns people into monsters. And even then they didn't get it quite right: the infected in the book are traditional vampires (which the book painstakingly comes up with scientific explanations for all their weaknesses: sunlight, aversion to mirrors and holy objects, garlic, staking) who are slow and stupid like zombies, while in the movie they are just hairless, pale cannibals like the monsters from TheDescent. In the new movie it's a virus, but in the old book, it was a type of bacteria. Also, a Caucasian-to-minority RaceLift for the main character, Robert Neville, who is nothing like the Neville of the book. Neville's unique immunity is just something that he was born with, and there are plenty of others who are also immune. The setting was a suburb in a small town, while the movie takes places in a desolated New York city. There is no Ben Cortman character (unless you count the nameless infected leader, and even then he shares nothing in common with the neighbor-turned vampire character from the book). There is no separate faction of intelligent, civilized vampires (maybe because they thought viewing audiences would be dense to understand that concept). The woman that Neville meets does not [[spoiler: turn out to be one of the intelligent vampires and betray him]]. Of course, ''I Am Legend'' isn't TheFilmOfTheBook so much as a remake of ''Film/TheOmegaMan'', which is ''itself'' an InNameOnly adaptation of the book ''Literature/IAmLegend''... Except for the name, of course, and the film gives the meaning of the title an entirely different meaning. Robert Neville is a legend because he developed a cure, while in the book Neville [[spoiler: is a legend because in a world inhabited entirely by vampires, the one normal human that hunts them is the monster. He walks in the daylight, he stalks them while they are sleeping and impales them to leave bloodless corpses behind. It makes him the "human Dracula" of this world]]. The original ending would've given it some connection with the book it was apparently based on, but that was changed too.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/IAmLegend'': The original ending would've given it some connection with the book it was apparently based on, but that was changed too... now the only thing they have in common is a disease that turns people into monsters. And even then they didn't get it quite right. In the new movie it's a virus, but in the old book, it was a type of bacteria. Also, a Caucasian-to-minority RaceLift for the main character, Robert Neville. Of course, ''I Am Legend'' isn't TheFilmOfTheBook so much as a remake of ''Film/TheOmegaMan'', which is ''itself'' an InNameOnly adaptation of the book ''Literature/IAmLegend''... Except for the name, of course.

to:

* ''Film/IAmLegend'': The original ending would've given it some connection with the book it was apparently based on, but that was changed too... now the only thing they have in common is a disease that turns people into monsters. And even then they didn't get it quite right.right: the infected in the book are traditional vampires (which the book painstakingly comes up with scientific explanations for all their weaknesses: sunlight, aversion to mirrors and holy objects, garlic, staking) who are slow and stupid like zombies, while in the movie they are just hairless, pale cannibals like the monsters from TheDescent. In the new movie it's a virus, but in the old book, it was a type of bacteria. Also, a Caucasian-to-minority RaceLift for the main character, Robert Neville.Neville, who is nothing like the Neville of the book. Neville's unique immunity is just something that he was born with, and there are plenty of others who are also immune. The setting was a suburb in a small town, while the movie takes places in a desolated New York city. There is no Ben Cortman character (unless you count the nameless infected leader, and even then he shares nothing in common with the neighbor-turned vampire character from the book). There is no separate faction of intelligent, civilized vampires (maybe because they thought viewing audiences would be dense to understand that concept). The woman that Neville meets does not [[spoiler: turn out to be one of the intelligent vampires and betray him]]. Of course, ''I Am Legend'' isn't TheFilmOfTheBook so much as a remake of ''Film/TheOmegaMan'', which is ''itself'' an InNameOnly adaptation of the book ''Literature/IAmLegend''... Except for the name, of course.course, and the film gives the meaning of the title an entirely different meaning. Robert Neville is a legend because he developed a cure, while in the book Neville [[spoiler: is a legend because in a world inhabited entirely by vampires, the one normal human that hunts them is the monster. He walks in the daylight, he stalks them while they are sleeping and impales them to leave bloodless corpses behind. It makes him the "human Dracula" of this world]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Which is such a shame, as the first few minutes of the film really capture the 'feel' of ''Franchise/ResidentEvil'', only to have it immediately thrown away to move out of the mansion and onto the technological underground bunker.

to:

** Which is such a shame, as the first few minutes of the first film really capture the 'feel' of ''Franchise/ResidentEvil'', only to have it immediately thrown away to move out of the mansion and onto the technological underground bunker.

Removed: 1036

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moving to What Could Have Been.Film


* According to [[http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/movie-talk-twilight-that-almost-was.html this article]], the film adaptation of ''Literature/{{Twilight}}'' [[WhatCouldHaveBeen would have become this]]. ExecutiveMeddling at Paramount was originally planning to turn ''Twilight'' into a far more action-heavy movie -- think ''Film/{{Underworld}}'' [[RecycledInSpace in high school]] -- in order to bring in more male viewers. Bella was made into a far more active character (she was written as a track star) who fought back against the vampires, and gets turned into one herself in the first movie. AnyoneCanDie was in full effect, with Bella's dad dying by the end of the movie. A Korean FBI vampire hunter was introduced [[UnfortunateImplications as an antagonist]], and one scene had vampires picking off members of a SWAT team sent into a forest after them. Creator/StephenieMeyer decided to pull an ExecutiveVeto on that idea and, instead, sold the rights to Summit, which made an adaptation that was far more faithful to the novel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Subverted in the NES Game "Journey to Silius". Released in 1990 by Sunsoft and Tokai Engineering, the game was originally based on the 1984 film The Terminator, but Sunsoft lost the licensing privileges during development when the game was largely completed. Sunsoft went back, changed a few sprites and official story, but leaving the levels largely intact. Playing through the game shows a deep influence of the movie on the game.

to:

* Subverted in Inverted with the NES Game "Journey game ''Journey to Silius". Silius''. Released in 1990 by Sunsoft and Tokai Engineering, the game Sunsoft, ''Silius'' was originally developed as a game based on the 1984 film The Terminator, movie ''Film/TheTerminator'', but Sunsoft lost the licensing privileges license during development when the game was largely completed. development. Sunsoft went back, changed a few sprites character designs and official story, but leaving the levels stages largely intact. Playing through the game shows a deep influence of the movie on the game.intact.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Fanfiction in general is often like this, as writers will often use elements they like for their stories, even if they have little to do with the original work (such as the many HighSchoolAU fics).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** speaking of ''ComicStrip/LittleLulu'', the orignal cartoons produced by FamousStudios in the 1940s were barely true to the comics, keeping only the title character Lulu (though [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DemotedToExtra some of her friends did appear in a few shorts. very few though.]] And that's about it.

to:

** speaking of ''ComicStrip/LittleLulu'', the orignal cartoons produced by FamousStudios in the 1940s were barely true to the comics, keeping only the title character Lulu (though (though [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DemotedToExtra some of her friends did appear in a few shorts. very few though.]] And that's about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** speaking of ''ComicStrip/LittleLulu'', the orignal cartoons produced by FamousStudios in the 1940s were barely true to the comics, keeping only the title character Lulu (though [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DemotedToExtra some of her friends did appear in a few shorts. very few though.]] And that's about it.

to:

** speaking of ''ComicStrip/LittleLulu'', the orignal cartoons produced by FamousStudios in the 1940s were barely true to the comics, keeping only the title character Lulu (though (though [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DemotedToExtra some of her friends did appear in a few shorts. very few though.]] And that's about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** speaking of ''ComicStrip/LittleLulu'', the orignal cartoons produced by FamousStudios in the 1940s were barely true to the comics, keeping only the title character Lulu (though [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DemotedToExtra some of her friends did appear in a few shorts. very few though.]] And that's about it.

to:

** speaking of ''ComicStrip/LittleLulu'', the orignal cartoons produced by FamousStudios in the 1940s were barely true to the comics, keeping only the title character Lulu (though (though [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DemotedToExtra some of her friends did appear in a few shorts. very few though.]] And that's about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** speaking of ''ComicStrip/LittleLulu'', the orignal cartoons produced by FamousStudios in the 1940s were barely true to the comics, keeping only the title character Lulu (though [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DemotedToExtra some of her friends did appear in a few shorts. very few though.]] And that's about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The upcoming ''Series/WalkingWithDinosaurs'' 3D movie doesn't follow the documentary format of the original series, opting instead for telling a coherent story with ''slightly'' anthropomorphised dinosaurs. Nor are the original creators involved. It seemingly has more in common with ''WesternAnimation/MarchOfTheDinosaurs'' and ''Series/DinosaurRevolution''.


Added DiffLines:

* ''Franchise/{{Bionicle}} Heroes'' has its characters named after their toy counterparts and they also look like them more or less, but apart from that, the settings, the story, the personalities and powers are completely made-up. This was deliberate on the creator's part -- the original story didn't lend itself to an easily manageable video game and didn't have much in the way of {{Mooks}}... although they could have tried to include some of the main characters' more video game-y abilities or at least made sure that their own ideas didn't ''directly'' contradict the source canon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''WesternAnimation/SonicSATAM'' also fits the bill. Aside from Sonic, Robotnik, a few token appearances by Tails, the rings, and Buzzbombers, there wasn't much to tie it to the games.

to:

** ''WesternAnimation/SonicSATAM'' ''WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM'' also fits the bill. Aside from Sonic, Robotnik, a few token appearances by Tails, the rings, and Buzzbombers, there wasn't much to tie it to the games.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None





* Robo Bando is this to ''Manga/ElfenLied'' [[http://www.fanfiction.net/s/7444084/Robo-Bando]]

to:

* Robo Bando is this to ''Manga/ElfenLied'' [[http://www.fanfiction.net/s/7444084/Robo-Bando]]net/s/7444084 Robo Bando]] is this to ''Manga/ElfenLied''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
You do know the Shakespeare play doesn\'t happen in a space colony, right?


* Despite the title and what the credits claim, ''Anime/RomeoXJuliet'' has nothing to do with Shakespeare's Theatre/RomeoAndJuliet aside of the characters' names (but not their personalities). The setting was also retained, and the English version made use of some Shakespearean dialogue.

to:

* Despite the title and what the credits claim, ''Anime/RomeoXJuliet'' has nothing to do with Shakespeare's Theatre/RomeoAndJuliet aside of the characters' names (but not their personalities). The setting was also retained, and the English version made use of some Shakespearean dialogue.

Top