Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / HanlonsRazor

Go To

OR

Added: 119

Changed: 65

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* The various crimes of [[ArrestedDevelopment The Bluth Family]].


Added DiffLines:

* {{Archer}} gets a lot of mileage out of "No, it was just incompetence." "And that makes it better?" "... Doesn't it?"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fixed some spelling grammar


** This is a DiscussedTrope in Literature/ProvenGuilty, where it is shown that practitioners of BlackMagic almost always get involved in it due to not fully understanding the consequences of their actions, until they get too DrunkOnTheDarkSide to turn back. Harry specifically mentions that most "bad guys" never want to be bad guys, and often don't even realise that they are.

to:

** This is a DiscussedTrope in Literature/ProvenGuilty, where it is shown that practitioners of BlackMagic almost always get involved in it due to not fully understanding the consequences of their actions, until they get too DrunkOnTheDarkSide to turn back. Harry specifically mentions that most "bad guys" never want to be bad guys, and often don't even realise realize that they are.



* A ''very'' controversial theory, put forward by the British historian A.J.P. Taylor, suggests that AdolfHitler was ''not'' the evil scheming mastermind who had filed on his plans for world domination since the "Beer Hall Putsch" (as described in a certain piece of prison literature called ''Mein Kampf''), but instead was a more or less buffoonish opportunist, who initially never thought of actually pulling through any of his ”world domination schemes" (i.e. the invasion of Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland, France, Soviet Union, etc). According to Taylor, Hitler was a small fish in the big pond who got real lucky with his new title of "chancellor", and actually tried to [[{{Metaphorgotten}} weasel]] his way up as he swam with the stream, and that it was not until Britain and France had demonstrated their lack of stamina in enforcing the Versailles Treaty towards Germany that Hitler decided he could go even a step further and become more bratty. For instance, when he attempted to remilitarise the initially demilitarised Rhine area (whose demilitarisation was in return surveilled by France). He sent over troops on ''bikes and horses'', just in case the French retaliated and he needed to make a speedy retreat. When they didn't, he simply tested the patience of the Entente nations all the way to the invasion of Czechoslovakia and finally of Poland, when France and Britain finally declared war, realising that they had missed too many opportunities to stand up to Germany rather than appease.

to:

* A ''very'' controversial theory, put forward by the British historian A.J.P. Taylor, suggests that AdolfHitler was ''not'' the evil scheming mastermind who had filed on his plans for world domination since the "Beer Hall Putsch" (as described in a certain piece of prison literature called ''Mein Kampf''), but instead was a more or less buffoonish opportunist, who initially never thought of actually pulling through any of his ”world domination schemes" (i.e. the invasion of Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland, France, Soviet Union, etc). According to Taylor, Hitler was a small fish in the big pond who got real lucky with his new title of "chancellor", and actually tried to [[{{Metaphorgotten}} weasel]] his way up as he swam with the stream, and that it was not until Britain and France had demonstrated their lack of stamina in enforcing the Versailles Treaty towards Germany that Hitler decided he could go even a step further and become more bratty. For instance, when he attempted to remilitarise remilitarize the initially demilitarised demilitarized Rhine area (whose demilitarisation demilitarization was in return surveilled by France). He sent over troops on ''bikes and horses'', just in case the French retaliated and he needed to make a speedy retreat. When they didn't, he simply tested the patience of the Entente nations all the way to the invasion of Czechoslovakia and finally of Poland, when France and Britain finally declared war, realising realizing that they had missed too many opportunities to stand up to Germany rather than appease.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[TheDresdenFiles Harry Dresden]] has been both a beneficiary and a victim of this trope in a few instances; in Literature/TurnCoat, [[TheChessmaster the Gatekeeper]] says he can't decide if Harry is a truly brilliant DiabolicalMastermind or a blundering imbecile. Harry just says "Dude," and indicates [[CosmicPlaything the various injuries he's constantly getting]]. In Literature/GravePeril, a big moment for [[InspectorJavert Morgan]] is his acceptance that the many times Harry has flouted the Laws of Magic or been part of some kind of disaster are not due to deliberate malice, but due to arrogance, impulsiveness and recklessness.

to:

* [[TheDresdenFiles [[Literature/TheDresdenFiles Harry Dresden]] has been both a beneficiary and a victim of this trope in a few instances; in Literature/TurnCoat, [[TheChessmaster the Gatekeeper]] says he can't decide if Harry is a truly brilliant DiabolicalMastermind or a blundering imbecile. Harry just says "Dude," and indicates [[CosmicPlaything the various injuries he's constantly getting]]. In Literature/GravePeril, a big moment for [[InspectorJavert Morgan]] is his acceptance that the many times Harry has flouted the Laws of Magic or been part of some kind of disaster are not due to deliberate malice, but due to arrogance, impulsiveness and recklessness.

Added: 102

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Actually, her preconceived conclusion was that '''Beklar Bitterleaf''' and [[GuiltByAssociation everyone working with him]] is evil, evil, evil...but Beklar ''had'' shown her no small amount of unmistakable malice. One would need the patience of a saint ''not'' declare holy war after his attacks and provocations. Sure it was funny readers to watch the stuck-up paladin get her comeuppance from a RefugeInAudacity midget, but look at it from her perspective.

to:

*** Actually, her preconceived conclusion was that '''Beklar '''Belkar Bitterleaf''' and [[GuiltByAssociation everyone working with him]] is evil, evil, evil...but Beklar ''had'' shown her no small amount of unmistakable malice. One would need the patience of a saint ''not'' declare holy war after his attacks and provocations. Sure it was funny readers to watch the stuck-up paladin get her comeuppance from a RefugeInAudacity midget, but look at it from her perspective.perspective.
** Belkar himself coasts the edge of this Razor constantly. When he's not one or the other, he's both.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Actually, her preconceived conclusion was that '''Beklar Bitterleaf''' and [[GuiltByAssociation everyone working with him]] is evil, evil, evil...but Beklar ''had'' shown her no small amount of unmistakable malice. One would need the patience of a saint ''not'' declare holy war after his attacks and provocations. Sure it was funny readers to watch the stuck-up paladin get her comeuppance from a RefugeInAudacity midget, but look at it from her perspective.

Added: 255

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''VideoGame/{{Portal 2}}'', this is often used by fans to describe Wheatley, though it may or may not be accurate in canon. After [[spoiler:being in charge of the facility for a while]], it's a bit unclear whether or not he's just going along with it to cover up how incredibly inept he is.
** Whatever he may have become, GlaDOS is very clear that [[spoiler:Wheatley was ingeniously designed to consistently make bad choices, to such a degree that the only times he does anything clever is when doing so would inadvertently make the situation worse or hasten his own downfall.]]

to:

* ** In ''VideoGame/{{Portal 2}}'', this is often used by fans to describe Wheatley, though it may or may not be accurate in canon. After [[spoiler:being in charge of the facility for a while]], it's a bit unclear whether or not he's just going along with it to cover up how incredibly inept he is.
** *** Whatever he may have become, GlaDOS is very clear that [[spoiler:Wheatley was ingeniously designed to consistently make bad choices, to such a degree that the only times he does anything clever is when doing so would inadvertently make the situation worse or hasten his own downfall.]]]]
** Aperture founder Cave Johnson embraces willful ignorance in the belief that all scientific discovery occurs by accident, which would be hindered by competence. Does his deliberate stupidity make him more evil or does such a belief make him more stupid?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/TuckerAndDaleVsEvil'' runs on Hanlon's Razor, with each side thinking the other is murderous/suicidal lunatics, when it's all ([[spoiler:until the final act]]) a series of deadly accidents and misunderstandings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''WesternAnimation/SouthPark'' hung a ''big'' [[LampshadeHanging lampshade]] on this trope in an episode debunking 9/11 ConspiracyTheories. [[spoiler:The existence of conspiracy theories is actually a government conspiracy; Washington failed to ''prevent'' twenty Muslim lunatics with box cutters killing 3,000 people, so they'd rather allow people to believe that they ''made'' it happen -- it actually makes the government look more formidable and in control than it is]].

to:

* ''WesternAnimation/SouthPark'' hung a ''big'' [[LampshadeHanging lampshade]] on this trope in an episode debunking 9/11 ConspiracyTheories. [[spoiler:The existence of conspiracy theories is actually a government conspiracy; Washington failed to ''prevent'' twenty Muslim lunatics with box cutters killing 3,000 people, so they'd rather allow people to believe that they ''made'' it happen -- it actually makes the government look more formidable and in control than it is]].is. They do this because the conspiracy theorists are going [[CassandraTruth to ignore them when they try to tell the truth]], so they might as well play to that crowd as well]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This law relies on the assumption that ignorance in and of itself isn't malicious, which often doesn't fly in a court of law. It also doesn't account for malicious actions taken to conceal ignorance, which is TruthInTelevision - the [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Code_of_Silence Blue Code of Silence]].

to:

This law relies on the assumption that ignorance in and of itself isn't malicious, which often doesn't fly in a court of ''actual'' law. It also doesn't account for malicious actions taken to conceal ignorance, which is TruthInTelevision - the [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Code_of_Silence Blue Code of Silence]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This law relies on the assumption that ignorance in and of itself isn't malicious. It also doesn't account for malicious actions taken to conceal ignorance, which is TruthInTelevision - the [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Code_of_Silence Blue Code of Silence]].

to:

This law relies on the assumption that ignorance in and of itself isn't malicious.malicious, which often doesn't fly in a court of law. It also doesn't account for malicious actions taken to conceal ignorance, which is TruthInTelevision - the [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Code_of_Silence Blue Code of Silence]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* [[TheDresdenFiles Harry Dresden]] has been both a beneficiary and a victim of this trope in a few instances; in Literature/TurnCoat, [[TheChessmaster the Gatekeeper]] says he can't decide if Harry is a truly brilliant DiabolicalMastermind or a blundering imbecile. Harry just says "Dude," and indicates [[CosmicPlaything the various injuries he's constantly getting]]. In Literature/GravePeril, a big moment for [[InspectorJavert Morgan]] is his acceptance that the many times Harry has flouted the Laws of Magic or been part of some kind of disaster are not due to deliberate malice, but due to arrogance, impulsiveness and recklessness.
** This is a DiscussedTrope in Literature/ProvenGuilty, where it is shown that practitioners of BlackMagic almost always get involved in it due to not fully understanding the consequences of their actions, until they get too DrunkOnTheDarkSide to turn back. Harry specifically mentions that most "bad guys" never want to be bad guys, and often don't even realise that they are.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Those OccidentalOtaku who behave like such ("weeaboos"). You know the ones: they pepper their speech with gratuitous broken Japanese, they wear {{Cosplay}} even in places where it's not appropriate to do so, they center their existence on {{Anime}}, {{Manga}}, JPop, and the like. In short, they are {{Straw Fan}}s. While [[EvenNerdsHaveStandards many other anime fans are inclined to simply write them off]], or [[WhyWeCantHaveNiceThings distance themselves from the fandom]], it should be noted that the vast majority of the "weeaboos" don't act the way they do to deliberately be obnoxious. They do it because social skills take a long time to learn (and generally are not taught in classrooms), and because they have found something they simply latched onto that seems much more exotic and exciting than their day-to-day lives. Not that it makes their behavior or demeanor less annoying or upsetting, but at least it means that a) they most likely don't even know what they're doing is "wrong," and b) in a lot of cases, it can be corrected.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* About 90% of the plot of most MichaelCrichton novels is a blend of this and ''really'' bad luck in the form of multiple worst case scenarios coming true, combining, and then mutating into something even worse. Very few characters in his novels are actually ''evil'', they're mostly just lazy or short-sighted.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There was a movie made in the 1970s called ''The Lincoln Conspiracy''. It was "Oswald didn't act alone", with Lee Harvey Oswald replaced by John Wilkes Booth. (And 2011's ''The Conspirator'' covers a specific aspect of the same story.) And then it turns out that in reality [[FreakierThanFiction Booth actually was part of a conspiracy]]. It just turned out he was the only member of it who went through with the whole "murder another human being" aspect of the plan. His friend Lewis Paine stabbed the US Secretary of State but failed to kill him, and the other conspirator chickened out on shooting Vice President AndrewJohnson. All were eventually caught and hanged or imprisoned, except for Booth as he was shot by a soldier. Conspiracy theories claim he somehow escaped, it was a double kill, people in the US government were involved, etc[[note]]The circumstances of Booth's death didn't help. Everton Conger (1834 - 1918) was the one leading the search for the assassin. He did manage to track him down and was trying to capture him alive, for obvious interrogation purposes. Sergeant Boston Corbett (1832 - 1894?) suddenly shot at Booth, fatally wounding him. Booth was never interrogated. Conger reported Corbett's actions to be "without order, pretext or excuse". There are suggestions that Corbett was acting to silence the assassin. Far more likely, though, that it was another of Corbett's insane moments. The guy had a long history of strange behavior, arguably starting with his self-castration in 1858. Supposedly to avoid sexual temptation. He ended up in an insane asylum by 1887. His biographers have noted that Corbett had spend years working as a hatter; his exposure to mercury may have much to do with his strange behavior. At the time, mercury was used in the production of felt, so hat makers tended to suffer from mercury poisoning due to the daily exposure. Thus the phrase "mad as a hatter". And the statements made by the doctor who examined Booth's body afterwards don't help, either. He made numerous notes of things that were mismatched to Booth's known medical records, including a missing scar from the removal of a tumor that the doctor performing the examination had himself done quite recently.[[/note]]

to:

** There was a movie made in the 1970s called ''The Lincoln Conspiracy''. It was "Oswald didn't act alone", with Lee Harvey Oswald replaced by John Wilkes Booth. (And 2011's ''The Conspirator'' covers a specific aspect of the same story.) And then it turns out that in reality [[FreakierThanFiction Booth actually was part of a conspiracy]]. It just turned out he was the only member of it who went through with the whole "murder another human being" aspect of the plan. His friend Lewis Paine stabbed the US Secretary of State but failed to kill him, and the other conspirator chickened out on shooting Vice President AndrewJohnson. All were eventually caught and hanged or imprisoned, except for Booth as he was shot by a soldier. Conspiracy theories claim he somehow escaped, it was a double kill, people in the US government were involved, etc[[note]]The etc.[[note]]The circumstances of Booth's death didn't help. Everton Conger (1834 - 1918) was the one leading the search for the assassin. He did manage to track him down and was trying to capture him alive, for obvious interrogation purposes. Sergeant Boston Corbett (1832 - 1894?) suddenly shot at Booth, fatally wounding him. Booth was never interrogated. Conger reported Corbett's actions to be "without order, pretext or excuse". There are suggestions that Corbett was acting to silence the assassin. Far more likely, though, that it was another of Corbett's insane moments. The guy had a long history of strange behavior, arguably starting with his self-castration in 1858. Supposedly to avoid sexual temptation. He ended up in an insane asylum by 1887. His biographers have noted that Corbett had spend years working as a hatter; his exposure to mercury may have much to do with his strange behavior. At the time, mercury was used in the production of felt, so hat makers tended to suffer from mercury poisoning due to the daily exposure. Thus the phrase "mad as a hatter". And the statements made by the doctor who examined Booth's body afterwards don't help, either. He made numerous notes of things that were mismatched to Booth's known medical records, including a missing scar from the removal of a tumor that the doctor performing the examination had himself done quite recently.[[/note]]



* There's still some debate as to whether the Holodomor, the famine cause by Stalin's agricultural collectivization policies in the Ukraine, was the result of simple mismanagement or a deliberate genocide against a nation that had a (not undeserved) reputation as a breeding ground for counter-revolutionary sentiment. [[InvertedTrope This is]] ''Stalin'' -- how this trope applies to totalitarian psychopaths is an interesting question.

to:

* There's still some debate as to whether the Holodomor, the famine cause caused by Stalin's agricultural collectivization policies in the Ukraine, was the result of simple mismanagement or a deliberate genocide against a nation that had a (not undeserved) reputation as a breeding ground for counter-revolutionary sentiment. [[InvertedTrope This is]] ''Stalin'' -- how this trope applies to totalitarian psychopaths is an interesting question.



** The same is being debated about every dictators policies.

to:

** The same is being debated about every dictators dictator's policies.



* A bit of [[SelfDeprecation self-aware humor]] in the US government is that the proof that there is no vast government conpsiracy to cover up the existance of aliens is that such a conspiracy would rely on the idea that the US government is capable of doing ''anything'' with what resembles competence or discretion.

to:

* A bit of [[SelfDeprecation self-aware humor]] in the US government is that the proof that there is no vast government conpsiracy conspiracy to cover up the existance existence of aliens is that such a conspiracy would rely on the idea that the US government is capable of doing ''anything'' with what resembles competence or discretion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In fairness to the rulers of Europe, the basic idea of the treaties was to discourage attack through M.A.D. and serve as a balance of power, as any nation attacking any other nation would involve, well, a world war that would devastate everyone. Unfortunately, unlike what has happened with nukes, it wasn't obvious how much devastation would actually occur, so policymakers became a bit too optimistic about their war plans and went for war once an excuse came along, much to everyone's misfortune.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** That leaves willful neglect as the simplest conspiracy hypothesis; all it's lacking is the notoriously elusive proof of intent.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not really an example, and also the Ottoman army was already within the walls at the time of the Kerkoporta incident.


* Twas neither the might of the Turkish siege nor internal betrayal that finally cracked the mighty defenses of the nigh-impregnable Constantinople. Just some random nobody (whoops) forgetting to lock a door.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Already quoted in the introduction.


* As IanFleming once wrote: "Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Megatron from ''WesternAnimation/TheTransformers'' gives [[TheStarscream Starscream]] the opportunity to use this as a defense when they are betrayed by the Triple Changers, who then take over the Decepticons.
-->'''Megatron''': You're either lying or stupid.\\
'''Starscream''': I'm stupid! I'm stupid!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--->'''Sluggy Character:''' Why did you do ABCDGFQRS XanatosRoulette?\\

to:

--->'''Sluggy Character:''' Why did you do ABCDGFQRS XanatosRoulette?\\[[GambitRoulette Xanatos Roulette]]?\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


See also PoesLaw.

to:

See also PoesLaw.PoesLaw and TrollFic.

Added: 1129

Changed: 1460

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A corollary to FinaglesLaw which has an infinite applications in writing comedy:

to:

A corollary to FinaglesLaw which has an seems to have almost infinite applications in writing comedy:



::'' Don't assume malice when stupidity is an adequate explanation; not the first time.''

The reasoning is suggested in the Mrs. Bridges test (taken from the BBC's ''UpstairsDownstairs'': "Once is bad luck, twice is a bad habit"). Thus malice becomes a reasonable hypothesis after two events. At this point the [[WKRPInCincinnati Dr Johnny Fever]] rule applies ("When everybody is out to get you, [[ProperlyParanoid paranoia is straight thinking]]"), or, as articulated by IanFleming "Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action."

Disregarding it is a prerequisite for plots involving an AncientConspiracy, GovernmentConspiracy or similar antagonist. The existence of a powerful, secretive, and malicious cabal makes for juicier storytelling than the idea that something bad happened because one of the people in power was lazy, short-sighted, impulsive, or stupid. [[ConspiracyTheorist Of course, THEY would prefer that you believe THEM to be stupid instead of evil]]. Most aversions involve someone saying that the noise you heard was [[ItsProbablyNothing just the wind]].

to:

::'' Don't assume malice when stupidity is an adequate explanation; explanation. At least, not the first time.''

The reasoning is suggested in However, once you pass the Mrs. Bridges test (taken from the BBC's ''UpstairsDownstairs'': ''UpstairsDownstairs'', in that "Once is bad luck, twice is a bad habit"). Thus habit"), malice becomes a reasonable hypothesis after two events. hypothesis. At this point the [[WKRPInCincinnati Dr Johnny Fever]] rule applies ("When everybody is out to get you, [[ProperlyParanoid paranoia is just straight thinking]]"), or, as articulated by IanFleming "Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action."

Disregarding it is a prerequisite for plots involving an AncientConspiracy, GovernmentConspiracy or similar antagonist. The existence of a powerful, secretive, and malicious cabal makes for juicier storytelling than the idea that something bad happened because one of the people in power was lazy, short-sighted, impulsive, or just plain stupid. [[ConspiracyTheorist Of course, THEY would prefer that you believe THEM to be stupid instead of evil]]. Most aversions involve someone saying that the noise you heard was [[ItsProbablyNothing just the wind]].



* In one episode of ''Series/TheLeague'', Ruxin thinks Taco is trying to screw with him by [[ItMakesSenseInContext manipulating him into]] sacrificing a great deal of time and money for an elaborate [[MilestoneCelebration 5th wedding anniversary party]] for his wife, and Taco later gets Ruxin in trouble with his wife by showing her previously unseen footage of their wedding video. If it was [[WithFriendsLikeThese another member of their group]], it would seem plausible that it was done on purpose, but there's no way [[{{Cloudcuckoolander}} Taco]] would [[TheStoner be capable]] of [[TheDitz pulling off]] something like that, nor would he want to.



** ''Webcomic/SluggyFreelance'' in general could be considered a continuous Hanlon's Razor. Half the story arcs in the series wouldn't exist if it weren't for people making incredibly stupid decisions. There are exceptions to this rule (see the Rule of Shadoes of Grey). For instance, the Ghouls were thought to be caused by some idiot unleashing a zombie plague, when in actuality [[spoiler:the Ghouls were a HordeOfAlienLocusts that had taken human form]]. 90% or more of the time a villain has done something right, it's because he or she, one of his or her underlings, or even one of the good/neutral guys has screwed up. A good number of the plots end with two characters thusly:
--->'''Sluggy Character:''' Why did you do ABCDGFQRS GambitRoulette?\\

to:

** ''Webcomic/SluggyFreelance'' in general could be considered a continuous big example of Hanlon's Razor. Half the story arcs in the series wouldn't exist if it weren't for people making incredibly stupid decisions. There are exceptions to this rule (see the Rule of Shadoes of Grey). For instance, decisions.
*** Though that particular example was a subversion, they thought
the Ghouls were thought to be caused by some idiot unleashing a zombie plague, when in actuality [[spoiler:the Ghouls were a HordeOfAlienLocusts that had taken human form]]. form]].
**
90% or more of the time a villain has done something right, it's because he or she, one of his or her underlings, or even one of the good/neutral guys has screwed up. A good number of the plots end with two characters thusly:
--->'''Sluggy Character:''' Why did you do ABCDGFQRS GambitRoulette?\\XanatosRoulette?\\



* In ''Webcomic/TheOrderOfTheStick'', [[TheHero Roy]] tells [[KnightTemplar Miko]] that he had killed the evil lich [[BigBad Xykon]]. When she meets Xykon [[DemBones in the bones]] she immediately comes to the conclusion that Roy and the rest of the Order of the Stick are working for Xykon, and deceived her. The real explanation is that the Order didn't know how to destroy a lich: Xykon was not destroyed, but regenerated from his [[SoulJar phylactery]] after the Order were long gone.
** Miko's LawfulStupid nature causes her to attribute anything to malice rather than incompetence, because of the Prosecutor's Fallacy in dismissing any explanation that doesn't fit her preconceived conclusion that Roy Greenhilt and everyone working with him is evil, evil, evil. The ridiculous and paranoid theories she's forced to devise to hold to this viewpoint results in her invoking Grey's Law, when her willful ignorance that the Order of the Stick is not working for the bad guys becomes much, ''much'' more harmful to her homeland than any actual malice could have been. [[spoiler:Murdering the city's ruler in the insane belief that ''he'' was working with Xykon because he was cooperating with Roy, who, as we all know, ''has'' to be evil, nearly murdering the ruler's heir because she assumes being proven wrong was just a test by the gods/a trick by Roy, and eventually stopping the founder of her order from defeating the villains and saving the city when her own incompetence leads her to destroy the stone he was guarding, killing her, saving the lives of the BigBad and TheDragon, and dooming her homeland to Goblin occupation.]]

to:

* In ''Webcomic/TheOrderOfTheStick'', [[TheHero Roy]] tells [[KnightTemplar Miko]] that he had killed the evil lich [[BigBad Xykon]]. When she meets Xykon in the flesh (except, y'know, [[DemBones in the bones]] not]]), she immediately comes to the conclusion that Roy and the rest of the Order of the Stick are working for Xykon, and deceived her. The real explanation is that the Order didn't know how to destroy a lich: Xykon was not did get destroyed, but regenerated from his [[SoulJar phylactery]] after the Order were long gone.
** Miko's LawfulStupid nature causes her to attribute anything to malice rather than incompetence, because of particularly since she ''embodies'' the Prosecutor's Fallacy in dismissing any explanation that doesn't fit her preconceived conclusion that Roy Greenhilt and everyone working with him is evil, evil, evil. The ridiculous and paranoid theories she's forced to devise to hold to this viewpoint results in her invoking Grey's Law, when her willful ignorance that the Order of the Stick is not working for the bad guys becomes much, ''much'' more harmful to her homeland than any actual malice could have been. [[spoiler:Murdering the city's ruler in the insane belief that ''he'' was working with Xykon because he was cooperating with Roy, who, as we all know, ''has'' to be evil, nearly murdering the ruler's heir because she assumes being proven wrong was just a test by the gods/a trick by Roy, and eventually stopping the founder of her order from defeating the villains and saving the city when her own incompetence leads her to destroy the stone he was guarding, killing her, saving the lives of the BigBad and TheDragon, and dooming her homeland to Goblin occupation.]]



* This played a role in WWI. The fact that 4 years of horribly bloody conflict were kicked off because of a student with a pistol on a fortuitous lunch run boggles the mind. Europe in 1914 was a tangled web of treaties, ethnic tensions, and monarchical rivalries. To add to the mess, the war itself was, in all likelihood, inevitable: nobody had thought very hard when signing mutual defense treaties saying that "If any state declares war on X, we will declare war on that state." When somebody finally followed through with their treaty obligation to do just that, a dead guy's war plans went into effect automatically, and there's some evidence for the theory that the US was dragged in because some people in Europe felt that it wasn't fair to let the US stay out of the party.
* A ''very'' controversial theory, put forward by the British historian A.J.P. Taylor, suggests that AdolfHitler was ''not'' the evil scheming mastermind who had filed on his plans for world domination since the "Beer Hall Putsch" (as described in a certain piece of prison literature called ''Mein Kampf''), but instead was a more or less buffoonish opportunist, who initially never thought of pulling through any of his ”world domination schemes" (i.e. the invasion of Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland, France, Soviet Union, etc). According to Taylor, Hitler was a small fish in the big pond who got real lucky with his new title of "chancellor", and actually tried to [[{{Metaphorgotten}} weasel]] his way up as he swam with the stream, and that it was not until Britain and France had demonstrated their lack of stamina in enforcing the Versailles Treaty towards Germany that Hitler decided he could go even a step further and become more bratty. For instance, when he attempted to remilitarise the initially demilitarised Rhine area (whose demilitarisation was in return surveilled by France). He sent over troops on ''bikes and horses'', just in case the French retaliated and he needed to make a speedy retreat. When they didn't, he simply tested the patience of the Entente nations all the way to the invasion of Czechoslovakia and finally of Poland, when France and Britain finally declared war, realising that they had missed too many opportunities to stand up to Germany rather than appease.

to:

* This played Everything surrounding WorldWarI can be explained by the leaders of Europe acting like a role in WWI.bunch of gibbering morons. The fact that 4 years of horribly bloody conflict were kicked off because of a student with a pistol on a fortuitous lunch run boggles the mind. Europe in 1914 was a tangled web of treaties, ethnic tensions, and monarchical rivalries. To add to the mess, the war itself was, in all likelihood, inevitable: nobody had thought very hard when signing mutual defense treaties saying that "If any state declares war on X, we will declare war on that state." When [[HilarityEnsues Hilarity,]] of a sort, [[HilarityEnsues Ensued]] when somebody actually finally followed ''did'' follow through with their treaty obligation to do just that, a dead guy's war plans went into effect automatically, and there's some evidence for the theory that the US was dragged in because some people in Europe felt that it wasn't fair to let the US stay out of the party.
party. That probably counts as 'ignorance' of a sort, given that it could have easily enough backfired horribly.
* A ''very'' controversial theory, put forward by the British historian A.J.P. Taylor, suggests that AdolfHitler was ''not'' the evil scheming mastermind who had filed on his plans for world domination since the "Beer Hall Putsch" (as described in a certain piece of prison literature called ''Mein Kampf''), but instead was a more or less buffoonish opportunist, who initially never thought of actually pulling through any of his ”world domination schemes" (i.e. the invasion of Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland, France, Soviet Union, etc). According to Taylor, Hitler was a small fish in the big pond who got real lucky with his new title of "chancellor", and actually tried to [[{{Metaphorgotten}} weasel]] his way up as he swam with the stream, and that it was not until Britain and France had demonstrated their lack of stamina in enforcing the Versailles Treaty towards Germany that Hitler decided he could go even a step further and become more bratty. For instance, when he attempted to remilitarise the initially demilitarised Rhine area (whose demilitarisation was in return surveilled by France). He sent over troops on ''bikes and horses'', just in case the French retaliated and he needed to make a speedy retreat. When they didn't, he simply tested the patience of the Entente nations all the way to the invasion of Czechoslovakia and finally of Poland, when France and Britain finally declared war, realising that they had missed too many opportunities to stand up to Germany rather than appease.



** Conspiracy theories in general depend on the assumption that a ''lack'' of evidence is in turn ''proof'' of a cover-up. Plain ol' incompetence with a dose of coincidence doesn't seem like a cool enough explanation.

to:

** Conspiracy theories in general depend on the assumption that a ''lack'' of evidence is in turn ''proof'' of a cover-up. Plain ol' incompetence with a dose of coincidence just doesn't seem like a cool enough explanation.explanation, apparently.



--->"Just as [[OccamsRazor it's wrong to find complicated conspiracy where simple incompetence will explain everything]], it's also [[HanlonsRazor wrong to presume evil motives where simple mental retardation may be the explanation.]]" The best part of that article is that it [[spoiler:has fake advertisements for Halliburton and Freemasonry, implying that the article itself is all part of the conspiracy]].

to:

--->"Just as [[OccamsRazor it's wrong to find complicated conspiracy where simple incompetence will explain everything]], it's also [[HanlonsRazor wrong to presume evil motives where simple mental retardation may be the explanation.]]" ]]"
***
The best part of that article is that it [[spoiler:has fake advertisements for Halliburton and Freemasonry, implying that the article itself is all part of the conspiracy]].

Changed: 1470

Removed: 476

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Xanatos Roulette is no longer a trope name. Calling people \'gibbering idiots\' is not cool.


A corollary to FinaglesLaw which seems to have almost infinite applications in writing comedy:

to:

A corollary to FinaglesLaw which seems to have almost has an infinite applications in writing comedy:



::'' Don't assume malice when stupidity is an adequate explanation. At least, not the first time.''

However, once you pass the Mrs. Bridges test (taken from the BBC's ''UpstairsDownstairs'', in that "Once is bad luck, twice is a bad habit"), malice becomes a reasonable hypothesis. At this point the [[WKRPInCincinnati Dr Johnny Fever]] rule applies ("When everybody is out to get you, [[ProperlyParanoid paranoia is just straight thinking]]"), or, as articulated by IanFleming "Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action."

Disregarding it is a prerequisite for plots involving an AncientConspiracy, GovernmentConspiracy or similar antagonist. The existence of a powerful, secretive, and malicious cabal makes for juicier storytelling than the idea that something bad happened because one of the people in power was lazy, short-sighted, impulsive, or just plain stupid. [[ConspiracyTheorist Of course, THEY would prefer that you believe THEM to be stupid instead of evil]]. Most aversions involve someone saying that the noise you heard was [[ItsProbablyNothing just the wind]].

to:

::'' Don't assume malice when stupidity is an adequate explanation. At least, explanation; not the first time.''

However, once you pass The reasoning is suggested in the Mrs. Bridges test (taken from the BBC's ''UpstairsDownstairs'', in that ''UpstairsDownstairs'': "Once is bad luck, twice is a bad habit"), habit"). Thus malice becomes a reasonable hypothesis. hypothesis after two events. At this point the [[WKRPInCincinnati Dr Johnny Fever]] rule applies ("When everybody is out to get you, [[ProperlyParanoid paranoia is just straight thinking]]"), or, as articulated by IanFleming "Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action."

Disregarding it is a prerequisite for plots involving an AncientConspiracy, GovernmentConspiracy or similar antagonist. The existence of a powerful, secretive, and malicious cabal makes for juicier storytelling than the idea that something bad happened because one of the people in power was lazy, short-sighted, impulsive, or just plain stupid. [[ConspiracyTheorist Of course, THEY would prefer that you believe THEM to be stupid instead of evil]]. Most aversions involve someone saying that the noise you heard was [[ItsProbablyNothing just the wind]].



** ''Webcomic/SluggyFreelance'' in general could be considered a big example of Hanlon's Razor. Half the story arcs in the series wouldn't exist if it weren't for people making incredibly stupid decisions.
*** Though that particular example was a subversion, they thought the Ghouls were caused by some idiot unleashing a zombie plague, when in actuality [[spoiler:the Ghouls were a HordeOfAlienLocusts that had taken human form]].
** 90% or more of the time a villain has done something right, it's because he or she, one of his or her underlings, or even one of the good/neutral guys has screwed up. A good number of the plots end with two characters thusly:
--->'''Sluggy Character:''' Why did you do ABCDGFQRS XanatosRoulette?\\

to:

** ''Webcomic/SluggyFreelance'' in general could be considered a big example of continuous Hanlon's Razor. Half the story arcs in the series wouldn't exist if it weren't for people making incredibly stupid decisions.
*** Though that particular example was a subversion, they thought
decisions. There are exceptions to this rule (see the Rule of Shadoes of Grey). For instance, the Ghouls were thought to be caused by some idiot unleashing a zombie plague, when in actuality [[spoiler:the Ghouls were a HordeOfAlienLocusts that had taken human form]].
**
form]]. 90% or more of the time a villain has done something right, it's because he or she, one of his or her underlings, or even one of the good/neutral guys has screwed up. A good number of the plots end with two characters thusly:
--->'''Sluggy Character:''' Why did you do ABCDGFQRS XanatosRoulette?\\GambitRoulette?\\



* In ''Webcomic/TheOrderOfTheStick'', [[TheHero Roy]] tells [[KnightTemplar Miko]] that he had killed the evil lich [[BigBad Xykon]]. When she meets Xykon in the flesh (except, y'know, [[DemBones not]]), she immediately comes to the conclusion that Roy and the rest of the Order of the Stick are working for Xykon, and deceived her. The real explanation is that the Order didn't know how to destroy a lich: Xykon did get destroyed, but regenerated from his [[SoulJar phylactery]] after the Order were long gone.
** Miko's LawfulStupid nature causes her to attribute anything to malice rather than incompetence, particularly since she ''embodies'' the Prosecutor's Fallacy in dismissing any explanation that doesn't fit her preconceived conclusion that Roy Greenhilt and everyone working with him is evil, evil, evil. The ridiculous and paranoid theories she's forced to devise to hold to this viewpoint results in her invoking Grey's Law, when her willful ignorance that the Order of the Stick is not working for the bad guys becomes much, ''much'' more harmful to her homeland than any actual malice could have been. [[spoiler:Murdering the city's ruler in the insane belief that ''he'' was working with Xykon because he was cooperating with Roy, who, as we all know, ''has'' to be evil, nearly murdering the ruler's heir because she assumes being proven wrong was just a test by the gods/a trick by Roy, and eventually stopping the founder of her order from defeating the villains and saving the city when her own incompetence leads her to destroy the stone he was guarding, killing her, saving the lives of the BigBad and TheDragon, and dooming her homeland to Goblin occupation.]]

to:

* In ''Webcomic/TheOrderOfTheStick'', [[TheHero Roy]] tells [[KnightTemplar Miko]] that he had killed the evil lich [[BigBad Xykon]]. When she meets Xykon in the flesh (except, y'know, [[DemBones not]]), in the bones]] she immediately comes to the conclusion that Roy and the rest of the Order of the Stick are working for Xykon, and deceived her. The real explanation is that the Order didn't know how to destroy a lich: Xykon did get was not destroyed, but regenerated from his [[SoulJar phylactery]] after the Order were long gone.
** Miko's LawfulStupid nature causes her to attribute anything to malice rather than incompetence, particularly since she ''embodies'' because of the Prosecutor's Fallacy in dismissing any explanation that doesn't fit her preconceived conclusion that Roy Greenhilt and everyone working with him is evil, evil, evil. The ridiculous and paranoid theories she's forced to devise to hold to this viewpoint results in her invoking Grey's Law, when her willful ignorance that the Order of the Stick is not working for the bad guys becomes much, ''much'' more harmful to her homeland than any actual malice could have been. [[spoiler:Murdering the city's ruler in the insane belief that ''he'' was working with Xykon because he was cooperating with Roy, who, as we all know, ''has'' to be evil, nearly murdering the ruler's heir because she assumes being proven wrong was just a test by the gods/a trick by Roy, and eventually stopping the founder of her order from defeating the villains and saving the city when her own incompetence leads her to destroy the stone he was guarding, killing her, saving the lives of the BigBad and TheDragon, and dooming her homeland to Goblin occupation.]]



* Everything surrounding WorldWarI can be explained by the leaders of Europe acting like a bunch of gibbering morons. The fact that 4 years of horribly bloody conflict were kicked off because of a student with a pistol on a fortuitous lunch run boggles the mind. Europe in 1914 was a tangled web of treaties, ethnic tensions, and monarchical rivalries. To add to the mess, the war itself was, in all likelihood, inevitable: nobody had thought very hard when signing mutual defense treaties saying that "If any state declares war on X, we will declare war on that state." [[HilarityEnsues Hilarity,]] of a sort, [[HilarityEnsues Ensued]] when somebody actually finally ''did'' follow through with their treaty obligation to do just that, a dead guy's war plans went into effect automatically, and there's some evidence for the theory that the US was dragged in because some people in Europe felt that it wasn't fair to let the US stay out of the party. That probably counts as 'ignorance' of a sort, given that it could have easily enough backfired horribly.
* A ''very'' controversial theory, put forward by the British historian A.J.P. Taylor, suggests that AdolfHitler was ''not'' the evil scheming mastermind who had filed on his plans for world domination since the "Beer Hall Putsch" (as described in a certain piece of prison literature called ''Mein Kampf''), but instead was a more or less buffoonish opportunist, who initially never thought of actually pulling through any of his ”world domination schemes" (i.e. the invasion of Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland, France, Soviet Union, etc). According to Taylor, Hitler was a small fish in the big pond who got real lucky with his new title of "chancellor", and actually tried to [[{{Metaphorgotten}} weasel]] his way up as he swam with the stream, and that it was not until Britain and France had demonstrated their lack of stamina in enforcing the Versailles Treaty towards Germany that Hitler decided he could go even a step further and become more bratty. For instance, when he attempted to remilitarise the initially demilitarised Rhine area (whose demilitarisation was in return surveilled by France). He sent over troops on ''bikes and horses'', just in case the French retaliated and he needed to make a speedy retreat. When they didn't, he simply tested the patience of the Entente nations all the way to the invasion of Czechoslovakia and finally of Poland, when France and Britain finally declared war, realising that they had missed too many opportunities to stand up to Germany rather than appease.

to:

* Everything surrounding WorldWarI can be explained by the leaders of Europe acting like This played a bunch of gibbering morons.role in WWI. The fact that 4 years of horribly bloody conflict were kicked off because of a student with a pistol on a fortuitous lunch run boggles the mind. Europe in 1914 was a tangled web of treaties, ethnic tensions, and monarchical rivalries. To add to the mess, the war itself was, in all likelihood, inevitable: nobody had thought very hard when signing mutual defense treaties saying that "If any state declares war on X, we will declare war on that state." [[HilarityEnsues Hilarity,]] of a sort, [[HilarityEnsues Ensued]] when When somebody actually finally ''did'' follow followed through with their treaty obligation to do just that, a dead guy's war plans went into effect automatically, and there's some evidence for the theory that the US was dragged in because some people in Europe felt that it wasn't fair to let the US stay out of the party. That probably counts as 'ignorance' of a sort, given that it could have easily enough backfired horribly.
party.
* A ''very'' controversial theory, put forward by the British historian A.J.P. Taylor, suggests that AdolfHitler was ''not'' the evil scheming mastermind who had filed on his plans for world domination since the "Beer Hall Putsch" (as described in a certain piece of prison literature called ''Mein Kampf''), but instead was a more or less buffoonish opportunist, who initially never thought of actually pulling through any of his ”world domination schemes" (i.e. the invasion of Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland, France, Soviet Union, etc). According to Taylor, Hitler was a small fish in the big pond who got real lucky with his new title of "chancellor", and actually tried to [[{{Metaphorgotten}} weasel]] his way up as he swam with the stream, and that it was not until Britain and France had demonstrated their lack of stamina in enforcing the Versailles Treaty towards Germany that Hitler decided he could go even a step further and become more bratty. For instance, when he attempted to remilitarise the initially demilitarised Rhine area (whose demilitarisation was in return surveilled by France). He sent over troops on ''bikes and horses'', just in case the French retaliated and he needed to make a speedy retreat. When they didn't, he simply tested the patience of the Entente nations all the way to the invasion of Czechoslovakia and finally of Poland, when France and Britain finally declared war, realising that they had missed too many opportunities to stand up to Germany rather than appease.



** Conspiracy theories in general depend on the assumption that a ''lack'' of evidence is in turn ''proof'' of a cover-up. Plain ol' incompetence with a dose of coincidence just doesn't seem like a cool enough explanation, apparently.

to:

** Conspiracy theories in general depend on the assumption that a ''lack'' of evidence is in turn ''proof'' of a cover-up. Plain ol' incompetence with a dose of coincidence just doesn't seem like a cool enough explanation, apparently.explanation.



--->"Just as [[OccamsRazor it's wrong to find complicated conspiracy where simple incompetence will explain everything]], it's also [[HanlonsRazor wrong to presume evil motives where simple mental retardation may be the explanation.]]"
*** The best part of that article is that it [[spoiler:has fake advertisements for Halliburton and Freemasonry, implying that the article itself is all part of the conspiracy]].

to:

--->"Just as [[OccamsRazor it's wrong to find complicated conspiracy where simple incompetence will explain everything]], it's also [[HanlonsRazor wrong to presume evil motives where simple mental retardation may be the explanation.]]"
***
]]" The best part of that article is that it [[spoiler:has fake advertisements for Halliburton and Freemasonry, implying that the article itself is all part of the conspiracy]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Wrong trope


* ''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer'': Harmony went from a human with a soul (stupid) to a vampire without one (evil), but her personality didn't change a whit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Twas neither the might of the Turkish siege not internal betrayal that finally cracked the defenses of the nigh-impregnable Constantinople. Just some random schmuck (whoops) forgetting to lock a door.

to:

* Twas neither the might of the Turkish siege not nor internal betrayal that finally cracked the mighty defenses of the nigh-impregnable Constantinople. Just some random schmuck nobody (whoops) forgetting to lock a door.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Twas neither the might of the Turkish siege not internal betrayal that finally cracked the defenses of the nigh-impregnable Constantinople. Just some random schmuck (whoops) forgetting to lock a door.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Literature/ASeriesOfUnfortunateEvents'': The line between willful villainy and pure incompetence is rather thin, especially since some incompetent and stupid characters become pawns in what seems like a GambitRoulette.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This [[http://www.cracked.com/article_15740_was-911-inside-job.html Cracked article]] says it best, and invokes this trope.

to:

** This [[http://www.cracked.com/article_15740_was-911-inside-job.html Cracked article]] says it best, and invokes explains this trope.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** And indeed pretty much every modern famine.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


However, once you pass the Mrs. Bridges test (taken from the BBC's ''UpstairsDownstairs'', in that "Once is bad luck, twice is a bad habit"), malice becomes a reasonable hypothesis. At this point the [[WKRPInCincinnati Dr Johnny Fever]] rule applies ("When everybody is out to get you, [[ProperlyParanoid paranoia is just straight thinking]]")

to:

However, once you pass the Mrs. Bridges test (taken from the BBC's ''UpstairsDownstairs'', in that "Once is bad luck, twice is a bad habit"), malice becomes a reasonable hypothesis. At this point the [[WKRPInCincinnati Dr Johnny Fever]] rule applies ("When everybody is out to get you, [[ProperlyParanoid paranoia is just straight thinking]]")
thinking]]"), or, as articulated by IanFleming "Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action."

Top