Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / ConfusingMultipleNegatives

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moved


* On the "Farthingale" episode of ''Series/{{Life}}'', Crews and fDani find out that the victim of the week was searching "not for the man not breaking the law, but for the man not ''not'' breaking the law." They eventually work it out.

to:

* On the "Farthingale" episode of ''Series/{{Life}}'', ''Series/{{Life|2007}}'', Crews and fDani find out that the victim of the week was searching "not for the man not breaking the law, but for the man not ''not'' breaking the law." They eventually work it out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Olive'''; Take a letter.\\

to:

-->'''Olive'''; -->'''Olive''': Take a letter.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ComicStrip/{{Popeye}} is a passenger on a steamboat (Brodax cartoon "Mississippi Sissy") when Olive (as a government agent) approaches him with an envelope:
-->'''Olive'''; Take a letter.\\
'''Popeye''': I ain't no secretary!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Page has been cutlisted


* London Mayor UsefulNotes/BorisJohnson won the 2004 Foot in Mouth award with this gem on ''Series/HaveIGotNewsForYou'': "I could not fail to disagree with you less."

to:

* London Mayor UsefulNotes/BorisJohnson Boris Johnson won the 2004 Foot in Mouth award with this gem on ''Series/HaveIGotNewsForYou'': "I could not fail to disagree with you less."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It's not impossible [[labelnote:4]]"possible"[[/labelnote]] to make a StealthInsult with this type of dialogue, by failing to resist not avoiding insulting [[labelnote:5]]"going ahead and insulting"[[/labelnote]] someone in a way that they're incapable of being unoffended by [[labelnote:6]]you know will offend them[[/labelnote]]. Alternatively, as in a SarcasticConfession, it's not impossible [[labelnote:7]]"possible"[[/labelnote]] to not promise you didn't do [[labelnote:8]]"admit"[[/labelnote]] something while not appearing to avoid denying [[labelnote:9]]"admitting"[[/labelnote]] it. This trope is not entirely unrelated to [[labelnote:10]]"is related to"[[/labelnote]] SuspiciouslySpecificDenial. Also not uncommon [[labelnote:11]]"common"[[/labelnote]] where ExactWords isn't known not to be [[labelnote:12]]"is"[[/labelnote]] in play. IKnowYouKnowIKnow conveys a similar degree of semantic confusion. This is also not dissimilar [[labelnote:13]]"similar"[[/labelnote]] to [[NoMeansYes No Does Not Avoid Meaning Yes]][[labelnote:14]]"No Means Yes"[[/labelnote]].

to:

It's not impossible [[labelnote:4]]"possible"[[/labelnote]] to make a StealthInsult with this type of dialogue, by failing to resist not avoiding insulting [[labelnote:5]]"going ahead and insulting"[[/labelnote]] someone in a way that they're incapable of being unoffended by by. [[labelnote:6]]you know will offend them[[/labelnote]]. them[[/labelnote]] Alternatively, as in a SarcasticConfession, it's not impossible [[labelnote:7]]"possible"[[/labelnote]] to not promise you didn't do [[labelnote:8]]"admit"[[/labelnote]] something while not appearing to avoid denying [[labelnote:9]]"admitting"[[/labelnote]] it. This trope is not entirely unrelated to [[labelnote:10]]"is related to"[[/labelnote]] SuspiciouslySpecificDenial. Also not uncommon [[labelnote:11]]"common"[[/labelnote]] where ExactWords isn't known not to be [[labelnote:12]]"is"[[/labelnote]] in play. IKnowYouKnowIKnow conveys a similar degree of semantic confusion. This is also not dissimilar [[labelnote:13]]"similar"[[/labelnote]] to [[NoMeansYes No Does Not Avoid Meaning Yes]][[labelnote:14]]"No Yes]].[[labelnote:14]]"No Means Yes"[[/labelnote]].
Yes"[[/labelnote]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The page quote is one of several ridiculously elaborate examples spouted by Pinocchio in ''WesternAnimation/ShrekTheThird''. Prince Charming interrogates him about Shrek's location since Pinocchio, of course, can't lie.[[note]]Or rather, he ''can'', but he always gives himself away.[[/note]] Pinocchio tries to twist the truth and worm his way out of the interrogation with convoluted, circular explanations without actually admitting any concrete information such as confirming whether or not he even knows where Shrek is. It seems to be working since Charming can't puzzle out the puppet's meaning, until eventually, Pinnochio's baffling multi-negatives frustrate the Three Little Pigs so much that one of them [[SayingTooMuch accidentally blurts it out]].

to:

* The page quote is one of several ridiculously elaborate examples spouted by Pinocchio in ''WesternAnimation/ShrekTheThird''. ''WesternAnimation/ShrekTheThird'': Prince Charming interrogates him Pinocchio about Shrek's location since Pinocchio, of course, can't lie.[[note]]Or rather, he ''can'', but he always gives himself away.[[/note]] Pinocchio tries to twist the truth and worm his way out of the interrogation with convoluted, circular explanations without actually admitting any concrete information such as confirming whether or not he even knows where Shrek is. It seems to be working since Charming can't puzzle out the puppet's meaning, until eventually, Pinnochio's baffling multi-negatives frustrate the Three Little Pigs so much that one of them [[SayingTooMuch accidentally blurts it out]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''Videogame/FallenLondon'' this is how people speak of the [[LanguageOfMagic Discordance]], partly out of a way to try and limit its negative effects (by saying what it can't do, because if it could do so it would cease to be Discordance) partly because it's the language of a being that was erased from reality so thoroughly that it's the only way one can actually speak about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
He's not trying to deny it. He's straight up conceding the point, which is why Kent doesn't know how to follow up. The joke is that we (and Kent) assume there's a "but" coming, but he just admits they're committing crimes and then stops.


** In "Homer the Vigilante", Homer ''tries'' to pull this off when he's interviewed on TV and Kent Brockman asks him what he has to say to accusations that his vigilante group is causing more crimes than it's preventing. Homer then "slyly" responds with, "Oh, Kent - I'd be lying if I said my men ''weren't'' committing crimes" - Brockman clearly isn't fooled, but doesn't press the issue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Fanfic/TotalDramaReturns'':
-->'''Izzy''': So we're doing a sacrifice? I nominate Chef!\\
'''Trent''': I agree. Let's sacrifice Chef.\\
'''Chef''': Shut up! Nobody ain't not sacrificin' nobody!\\
'''Gwen''': Wow. A quadruple negative. I didn't know that was even possible.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Wiki/SCPFoundation'':
** [[https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-2769 SCP-61231]]'s anomalous effects make his database entry ''full'' of these.
-->'''Discovery and Incident Record''': Lack of police reports of "a polite unarmed dollar bill not shooting lightning bolts" on a path away from the Hudson River led to demobilization of MTF Pi-1. [[note]]Police reports of "a rude armed crab shooting lightning bolts" on a path toward the Hudson River led to mobilization of MTF Pi-1.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


** Even the official United States constitution can get like this, what with "no person who shall not have attained the age of [[[YouMakeMeSic whatever]]] and who shall not have been a citizen for [x amount of years] shall be eligible to run for [whatever office]. Makes reading the article annoying.

to:

** Even the official United States constitution can get like this, what with "no person who shall not have attained the age of [[[YouMakeMeSic whatever]]] [whatever] and who shall not have been a citizen for [x amount of years] shall be eligible to run for [whatever office]. Makes reading the article annoying.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The page quote is one of several ridiculously elaborate examples spouted by Pinocchio in ''WesternAnimation/ShrekTheThird''. Prince Charming interrogates him about Shrek's location since Pinocchio, of course, can't lie.[[note]]Or rather, he ''can'', but he always gives himself away.[[/note]] Pinocchio tries to twist the truth and worm his way out of the interrogation with convoluted excuses. It seems to be working until eventually, his baffling multi-negatives frustrate the Three Little Pigs so much that one of them [[SayingTooMuch accidentally blurts it out]].

to:

* The page quote is one of several ridiculously elaborate examples spouted by Pinocchio in ''WesternAnimation/ShrekTheThird''. Prince Charming interrogates him about Shrek's location since Pinocchio, of course, can't lie.[[note]]Or rather, he ''can'', but he always gives himself away.[[/note]] Pinocchio tries to twist the truth and worm his way out of the interrogation with convoluted excuses. convoluted, circular explanations without actually admitting any concrete information such as confirming whether or not he even knows where Shrek is. It seems to be working since Charming can't puzzle out the puppet's meaning, until eventually, his Pinnochio's baffling multi-negatives frustrate the Three Little Pigs so much that one of them [[SayingTooMuch accidentally blurts it out]].

Added: 265

Changed: 128

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
another baba level


* ''VideoGame/BabaIsYou'' has a level where you are given nine "Not" keywords. The point is to use them to make a sentence across an impassable obstacle.

to:

* ''VideoGame/BabaIsYou'' has ''VideoGame/BabaIsYou''
** There is
a level where you are given nine "Not" keywords. The point is to use them to make a sentence across an impassable obstacle.obstacle.
** The New Adventures! level pack adds a level called "Exactly As It Says" which has the rule "not baba without not hedge is win".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''[[https://www.fanfiction.net/s/9076277/3/Unfortunately-Unbreakable Unfortunately Unbreakable]]'':
-->'''Bagman:''' Potter, you'll have to at least try to go get your wife, or you'll lose your magic.\\
'''Harry:''' Try, right? I love that word, 'try'.\\
'''Dumbledore:''' Harry, I'm sure you don't mean what I don't think you didn't meant to not to mean to say.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the ''Series/{{Frasier}}'' episode "The Wizard of Roz", Daphne has a premonition of danger and asks Niles not to go to Cafe Nervosa. He agrees but goes anyway. When she catches him, he hurts his knee by standing up quickly and hitting it against the table. The following conversation ensues:
-->'''Daphne:''' How could you come down here? You broke your promise.
-->'''Niles:''' And my patella.
-->'''Daphne:''' Well, nothing bad would have happened if you'd paid attention to my premonition.
-->'''Niles:''' Well, actually, nothing bad would have happened if you hadn't shown up.
-->'''Daphne:''' Well, it wouldn't have not happened had I not shown up.
-->'''Niles:''' Well, it wouldn't not have happened if you hadn't not shown up.
-->'''Daphne:''' And I wouldn't have shown up had I not known that you wouldn't have been able to not come down here.
-->'''Niles:''' Well, I'm not-not... not... What?
-->'''Daphne:''' My point exactly -- you don't listen.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* On the Election Night Special episode of ''Series/{{SCTV}}'', the bottle bill is worded in an extremely confusing way, so that it's hard to tell whether or not a "yes" vote is for disposable bottles, or a "no" vote is against returnable bottles, or a "no" vote is against the banning of disposable bottles, or a "yes" vote is against the making of returnable bottles, or, or, or....
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SelfDemonstrating/{{Bizarro}} and ComicBook/{{Bizarrogirl}} from the ''Franchise/{{Superman}}'' comics are easy to understand, in theory: Bizarros say the opposite of what's true. Some writers don't seem to understand this absurdly simple concept, and have them speak in absurd chains of multiple-negatives, making it impossible to understand what Bizarros are trying to say. On top of that, Bizarro also varies from just backwards to stupid to ''actually evil,'' meaning that even if you figure out ''what he's supposed to be saying,'' it ''still'' might be the opposite of what's actually ''true.''

to:

* SelfDemonstrating/{{Bizarro}} Bizarro and ComicBook/{{Bizarrogirl}} from the ''Franchise/{{Superman}}'' comics are easy to understand, in theory: Bizarros say the opposite of what's true. Some writers don't seem to understand this absurdly simple concept, and have them speak in absurd chains of multiple-negatives, making it impossible to understand what Bizarros are trying to say. On top of that, Bizarro also varies from just backwards to stupid to ''actually evil,'' meaning that even if you figure out ''what he's supposed to be saying,'' it ''still'' might be the opposite of what's actually ''true.''



* ''Fanfic/TheUnfantasticAdventuresOfBizarroNo1'' is set in [[BizarroUniverse Htrae]] and the action is narrated by SelfDemonstrating/{{Bizarro}}, so double negatives pop up every so often.

to:

* ''Fanfic/TheUnfantasticAdventuresOfBizarroNo1'' is set in [[BizarroUniverse Htrae]] and the action is narrated by SelfDemonstrating/{{Bizarro}}, Bizarro, so double negatives pop up every so often.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* On the ''LetsPlay/DreamSMP'', Quackity attempts to [[InvokedTrope invoke]] this in "The Official Manburg Hotel Building Permit", trying to trick [[ArcVillain Schlatt]] into [[MakesJustAsMuchSenseInContext paying child support]] on top of scamming him out of his presidency. Schlatt, being a savvy businessman, [[GenreSavvy notices this]] and [[LampshadeHanging calls him out on it]], claiming that it was a predatory way of writing a contract.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''WesternAnimation/TheAdventuresOfJimmyNeutronBoyGenius'': One episode has a now-genius-level Sheen do the "Not Not Not" variant to the teacher in hopes of getting out of class (he does), as does Jimmy to follow him. Later [[SubvertedTrope subverted]] when Carl tries this tactic (involving the word "disexcused"), but the teach simply replies with "PLANT IT!"

to:

* ''WesternAnimation/TheAdventuresOfJimmyNeutronBoyGenius'': One episode has a now-genius-level Sheen do the "Not Not Not" variant to the teacher in hopes of getting out of class (he does), as does Jimmy to follow him. Later [[SubvertedTrope subverted]] when Carl tries this tactic (involving [[PerfectlyCromulentWord the word "disexcused"), "disexcused"]]), but the teach simply replies with [[NoJustNoReaction "PLANT IT!"IT!"]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The page quote is one of several ridiculously elaborate examples spouted by Pinocchio in ''WesternAnimation/ShrekTheThird''. Prince Charming interrogates him about Shrek's location since Pinocchio, of course, can't lie.[[note]]Or rather, he ''can'', but he always gives himself away.[[/note]] Pinocchio tries to twist the truth and worm his way out of the interrogation with convoluted excuses. It seems to be working until eventually, his baffling multi-negatives frustrate the Three Little Pigs so much that one of them accidentally blurts it out.

to:

* The page quote is one of several ridiculously elaborate examples spouted by Pinocchio in ''WesternAnimation/ShrekTheThird''. Prince Charming interrogates him about Shrek's location since Pinocchio, of course, can't lie.[[note]]Or rather, he ''can'', but he always gives himself away.[[/note]] Pinocchio tries to twist the truth and worm his way out of the interrogation with convoluted excuses. It seems to be working until eventually, his baffling multi-negatives frustrate the Three Little Pigs so much that one of them [[SayingTooMuch accidentally blurts it out.out]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The page quote is one of several ridiculously elaborate examples spouted by Pinocchio in ''WesternAnimation/ShrekTheThird''. Prince Charming demands him to tell him Shrek's location since Pinocchio, of course, can't lie.[[note]]Or rather, he ''can'', but he always gives himself away.[[/note]] Pinocchio tries to twist the truth and worm his way out of the interrogation with convoluted excuses. It seems to be working until eventually, his baffling multi-negatives frustrate the Three Little Pigs so much that one of them accidentally blurts it out.

to:

* The page quote is one of several ridiculously elaborate examples spouted by Pinocchio in ''WesternAnimation/ShrekTheThird''. Prince Charming demands interrogates him to tell him about Shrek's location since Pinocchio, of course, can't lie.[[note]]Or rather, he ''can'', but he always gives himself away.[[/note]] Pinocchio tries to twist the truth and worm his way out of the interrogation with convoluted excuses. It seems to be working until eventually, his baffling multi-negatives frustrate the Three Little Pigs so much that one of them accidentally blurts it out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Link


* A weird variation occurs in ''Webcomic/{{Freefall}}'': A robot is programmed to '''not''' obey non-human orders. Florence orders it '''not''' to tell her what she wants to know, and as it's programmed to disobey, it does not not answer[[note]]it answers[[/note]] her question. Then Sam gets in on the act.

to:

* A weird variation occurs in ''Webcomic/{{Freefall}}'': A robot is programmed to '''not''' obey non-human orders. Florence orders it '''not''' to tell her what she wants to know, and as it's programmed to disobey, it does not not answer[[note]]it answers[[/note]] her question. Then [[http://freefall.purrsia.com/ff2300/fc02273.htm Then]] Sam gets in on the act.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/SlidingDoors'':
** James, trying to explain that he wanted to call Helen, but didn't:
-->'''James''': No, I mean, don't think that I have not called you. I haven't not called you. I mean, I don't...I don't mean I haven't not called you, because that's a double negative, so as to say that I have called you.
-->'''Helen''': When did you call?
-->'''James''': Well, I didn't. But I... I didn't not call you in the way that you might think I didn't call you. Oh, dear.
** At the end of the same conversation:
-->'''Helen''': Is that a will pick me up or a haven't, not, didn't, might?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* From ''WebVideo/ScottTheWoz'''s review of ''VideoGame/MarioTennis: Ultra Smash''.
-->'''Scott:''' I would love to find out what happened to this game in the background, but it'll never make it not totally never not bad.

Added: 44

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Simmons:''' That was like a... quadruple negative.

to:

'''Simmons:''' That was like a... quadruple negative.\\
'''Sarge:''' Just vote!\\
'''Simmons:''' Nay?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Overlapping with AmbigiousSyntax: the sentence "No head injury is too trivial to ignore". It's clearly meant to mean "All head injuries should be taken seriously" but, due to the odd wording, has at least ''three'' alterative meanings: that all head injuries are trivial and should be ignored, that not having a head injury is too trivial to ignore, or even that [[MindScrew not having a head injury is so trivial you can't ignore it.]]

to:

* Overlapping with AmbigiousSyntax: AmbiguousSyntax: the sentence "No head injury is too trivial to ignore". It's clearly meant to mean "All head injuries should be taken seriously" but, due to the odd wording, has at least ''three'' alterative alternative meanings: that all head injuries are trivial and should be ignored, that not having a head injury is too trivial to ignore, or even that [[MindScrew not having a head injury is so trivial you can't ignore it.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Overlapping with AmbigiousSyntax: the sentence "No head injury is too trivial to ignore". It's clearly meant to mean "All head injuries should be taken seriously" but, due to the odd wording, has at least ''three'' alterative meanings: that all head injuries are trivial and should be ignored, that not having a head injury is too trivial to ignore, or even that [[MindScrew not having a head injury is so trivial you can't ignore it.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's confusing because "!" is the negative, so the line of code is saying "not the state is not Colorado and the city is not Denver", or, more simply, "the state is Colorado and the city is Denver". It'd be better to write it like this:
---> state == "Colorado" && city == "Denver"

to:

** It's confusing because "!" is the negative, so the line of code is saying "not the state is not Colorado and the city is not Denver", or, more simply, "the state is Colorado and or the city is Denver".Denver"[[note]]NOT "and": Because an And statement is false if ''any'' of the arguments is false, the negation of an And is an Or[[/note]]. It'd be better to write it like this:
---> state == "Colorado" && || city == "Denver"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the ''WebVideo/HonestTrailers'' episode for ''Film/TheRiseOfSkywalker'' says that [[Creator/JJABrams the director]] has "never seen a landing he couldn't not stick."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In "Homer the Vigilante", Homer ''tries'' to pull this off when he's interviewed on TV and Kent Brockman asks him what he has to say to accusations that his vigilante group is causing more crimes than it's preventing. Homer then "slyly" responds with, "Oh, Kent - I'd be lying if I said my men ''weren't'' committing crimes" - Brockman ''very clearly'' isn't fooled, but doesn't press the issue.

to:

** In "Homer the Vigilante", Homer ''tries'' to pull this off when he's interviewed on TV and Kent Brockman asks him what he has to say to accusations that his vigilante group is causing more crimes than it's preventing. Homer then "slyly" responds with, "Oh, Kent - I'd be lying if I said my men ''weren't'' committing crimes" - Brockman ''very clearly'' clearly isn't fooled, but doesn't press the issue.

Top