Follow TV Tropes

Following

History HistoricalVillainUpgrade / LiveActionFilms

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''Film/CoolRunnings'', the Jamaican bobsled team's biggest rivals are the East Germans, who are portrayed as antagonistic pricks, turning their noses up at the upstart team from a poor country, with [[AllGermansAreNazis heavily-implied racism]] as well. In the real-life 1988 Winter Olympics, the East Germans were perhaps the ''most'' welcoming towards the Jamaicans and even lent them equipment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Film/{{Anonymous}}'' gets mentioned below for its portrayal of William Shakespeare, but the utterly bizarre depiction of Elizabeth as a woman who secretly slept around ''so'' much that she was constantly having bastard children, didn't bother keeping track of which families they were sent to, and ends up having an ''incestuous'' bastard by one of them definitely puts it here as well.

to:

** ''Film/{{Anonymous}}'' ''Film/{{Anonymous|2011}}'' gets mentioned below for its portrayal of William Shakespeare, but the utterly bizarre depiction of Elizabeth as a woman who secretly slept around ''so'' much that she was constantly having bastard children, didn't bother keeping track of which families they were sent to, and ends up having an ''incestuous'' bastard by one of them definitely puts it here as well.



* ''Film/{{Anonymous}}'' effectively turned Creator/WilliamShakespeare into an illiterate drunkard and the true killer of Creator/ChristopherMarlowe.

to:

* ''Film/{{Anonymous}}'' ''Film/{{Anonymous|2011}}'' effectively turned Creator/WilliamShakespeare into an illiterate drunkard and the true killer of Creator/ChristopherMarlowe.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/{{Lisztomania}}'': Music/RichardWagner really did hold antisemitic views, but the film portrays him as a swastika-wearing vampire/Antichrist who uses MindControlMusic to run a cult, creates a robotic Viking to kill Jews, massacres most of Berlin's Jewish population, ultimately causes UsefulNotes/WorldWarII, and [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking plagiarizes from Franz Liszt]].

to:

* ''Film/{{Lisztomania}}'': Music/RichardWagner really did hold antisemitic views, but the film portrays him as a swastika-wearing vampire/Antichrist who uses MindControlMusic to run a cult, creates a robotic Viking to kill Jews, massacres most of Berlin's Bayreuth's Jewish population, ultimately causes UsefulNotes/WorldWarII, and [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking plagiarizes from Franz Liszt]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
General clarification on works content


* ''Film/{{Lisztomania}}'': Music/RichardWagner really did hold antisemitic views, but the film portrays him as a swastika-wearing vampire/antichrist who uses his music to mind control people into killing Jews, creates a robotic Viking to bring back the master race, and [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking plagiarizes from Franz Liszt]].

to:

* ''Film/{{Lisztomania}}'': Music/RichardWagner really did hold antisemitic views, but the film portrays him as a swastika-wearing vampire/antichrist vampire/Antichrist who uses his music MindControlMusic to mind control people into killing Jews, run a cult, creates a robotic Viking to bring back the master race, kill Jews, massacres most of Berlin's Jewish population, ultimately causes UsefulNotes/WorldWarII, and [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking plagiarizes from Franz Liszt]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Crosswicking

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/{{Lisztomania}}'': Music/RichardWagner really did hold antisemitic views, but the film portrays him as a swastika-wearing vampire/antichrist who uses his music to mind control people into killing Jews, creates a robotic Viking to bring back the master race, and [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking plagiarizes from Franz Liszt]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/Napoleon2023'' greatly ups the already deplorable traits of the legendary French conqueror. One of the worst embellishments from Ridely Scott historians decried was Napoleon being depicted as abusing his first wife Joséphine with him brutally slapping her after Joséphine tells him she wants their marriage annulled. In actuality Napoleon's most redeeming trait was his documented deep love for Joséphine whom he continued to adore even after he was forced to seperate from her when she could not produce an heir. Napoleon would have never raised a hand against her as Scott's film depicts.

to:

* ''Film/Napoleon2023'' greatly ups the already deplorable traits of the legendary French conqueror. One of the worst embellishments from Ridely Scott historians decried was Napoleon being depicted as abusing his first wife Joséphine with him brutally slapping her after Joséphine tells him she wants their marriage annulled. In actuality Napoleon's most redeeming trait was his documented deep love for Joséphine whom he continued to adore even after he was forced to seperate from her when she could not produce an heir. Napoleon would have never raised a hand against her as Scott's film depicts. The film also depicts him shooting cannonballs at the pyramids of Giza ForTheEvulz like some sort of french Eric Cartman — whereas in reality [[https://amp.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2011/dec/22/napoleon-bonaparte-egypt-lost-scrolls Napoleon genuinely respected and was fascinated by ancient Egypt]] and never would’ve purposely damaged its architecture.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The name "Imhotep" is taken from the historical figure, the character is not a fictional portrayal of the figure.


* ''Film/TheMummy1932'' and ''Film/TheMummy1999'' both do this to [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imhotep#Medicine Imhotep]], the Ancient Egyptian chancellor of Pharaoh Djoser. From what little historians have unncovered about Imhotep he was ''definitely'' a great positive influence upon Egypt and to an extent mankind itself, with his great knowledge and skill in architecture, mathematics, and especially medicine as a physician resulting in him being revered as a HealerGod by Egyptian society. In the 1932 Universal ''Mummy'' movie however, Imhotep is a skulking undead EvilSorcerer who in the later Creator/BrendanFraser films is a WalkingWasteland, OmnicidalManiac and even a DarkMessiah - basically ''the exact opposite'' of everything the real life Imhotep was worshipped by Ancient Egyptians for.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)


** ''Film/QueenElizabethTheGoldenAge'' [[AmericansHateTingle bombed in Spain]] precisely because of this trope. Spanish audiences were insulted with its depiction of Philip II (a remarkably pious man) as -- quoting one critic -- "a cackling, Spanish Doctor Doom." And its prequel, ''Film/{{Elizabeth}}'', certainly followed the formula insofar as both her sister Mary and the Catholic Church at large were concerned.

to:

** ''Film/QueenElizabethTheGoldenAge'' ''Film/ElizabethTheGoldenAge'' [[AmericansHateTingle bombed in Spain]] precisely because of this trope. Spanish audiences were insulted with its depiction of Philip II (a remarkably pious man) as -- quoting one critic -- "a cackling, Spanish Doctor Doom." And its prequel, ''Film/{{Elizabeth}}'', certainly followed the formula insofar as both her sister Mary and the Catholic Church at large were concerned.

Added: 649

Changed: 365

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [[spoiler: Lord Salisbury, the Prime Minister.]]
** [[spoiler: Prince Victor Albert. Maybe Queen Victoria]]

to:

** [[spoiler: Lord [[spoiler:Lord Salisbury, the Prime Minister.]]
** [[spoiler: Prince [[spoiler:Prince Victor Albert. Maybe Queen Victoria]]Victoria.]]



* ''Film/ShadowOfTheVampire'', a fictionalized movie about the making of ''Film/{{Nosferatu}}'', depicts Max Schreck, the actor who played Graf Orlok, as a real [[OurVampiresAreDifferent vampire]] who kills multiple people. The real Schreck wasn't the most personable man, but even ignoring the supernatural stuff, there's no evidence that he committed any serious crimes, let alone murder.

to:

* ''Film/ShadowOfTheVampire'', a fictionalized movie about ''Film/ShadowOfTheVampire'':
** Max Schreck,
the making of actor who played Graf Orlok in ''Film/{{Nosferatu}}'', depicts Max Schreck, the actor who played Graf Orlok, is depicted as as a real [[OurVampiresAreDifferent vampire]] who kills multiple people. The real Schreck wasn't the most personable man, but even ignoring the supernatural stuff, there's no evidence that he committed any serious crimes, let alone murder.murder.
** ''Nosferatu'' director Creator/FriedrichWilhelmMurnau's perfectionist tendencies are also played up for the film. While it's true that he, like other directors of GermanExpressionism, had strict control over his set, he certainly didn't [[spoiler:allow his crew to be murdered in order to create a film masterpiece]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/Napoleon2023'' greatly ups the already deplorable traits of the legendary French conquer. One of the worst embellishments from Ridely Scott historians decried was Napoleon being depicted as abusing his first wife Joséphine with him brutally slapping her after Joséphine tells him she wants their marriage annulled. In actuality Napoleon‘s most redeeming trait was his documented deep love for Joséphine whom he continued to adore even after he was forced to seperate from her when she could not produce an heir. Despite his mass murder and cruelty to others Napoleon would have never raised a hand against her as Scott’s film depicts.

to:

* ''Film/Napoleon2023'' greatly ups the already deplorable traits of the legendary French conquer.conqueror. One of the worst embellishments from Ridely Scott historians decried was Napoleon being depicted as abusing his first wife Joséphine with him brutally slapping her after Joséphine tells him she wants their marriage annulled. In actuality Napoleon‘s Napoleon's most redeeming trait was his documented deep love for Joséphine whom he continued to adore even after he was forced to seperate from her when she could not produce an heir. Despite his mass murder and cruelty to others Napoleon would have never raised a hand against her as Scott’s Scott's film depicts.

Added: 644

Changed: 3

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/LordByron gets this in ''Film/MaryShelley''. While the film is from Mary's prospective and how she sees the chauvinistic and arrogant male writers around her, the film goes far to portray Byron as little more than egotistic, callous, misogynistic {{Jerkass}}. In the film, Byron drunkenly belittles Mary and Percy, abuses Mary's sister Claire his lover, only begrudgingly promising to provide financially for their illegitimate child and is perfectly okay with stealing credit for Dr. John William Polidori's story "The Vampyre". Byron wasn't the nicest or most well behaved poet in real life, but by all accounts he was a geuinely good friend and host to the Shelleies and he did actually care about Allegra the child he had with Claire (being truly upset at her death at just age five) and didn't treat her upbringing as an afterthought. Byron also didn't deliberately steal from Polidori in reality and was just as angry as the doctor for the mix up between their stories.

to:

* Creator/LordByron gets this in ''Film/MaryShelley''. While the film is from Mary's prospective and how she sees the chauvinistic and arrogant male writers around her, the film goes far to portray Byron as little more than an egotistic, callous, misogynistic {{Jerkass}}. In the film, Byron drunkenly belittles Mary and Percy, abuses Mary's sister Claire his lover, only begrudgingly promising to provide financially for their illegitimate child and is perfectly okay with stealing credit for Dr. John William Polidori's story "The Vampyre". Byron wasn't the nicest or most well behaved poet in real life, but by all accounts he was a geuinely good friend and host to the Shelleies and he did actually care about Allegra the child he had with Claire (being truly upset at her death at just age five) and didn't treat her upbringing as an afterthought. Byron also didn't deliberately steal from Polidori in reality and was just as angry as the doctor for the mix up between their stories.


Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/Napoleon2023'' greatly ups the already deplorable traits of the legendary French conquer. One of the worst embellishments from Ridely Scott historians decried was Napoleon being depicted as abusing his first wife Joséphine with him brutally slapping her after Joséphine tells him she wants their marriage annulled. In actuality Napoleon‘s most redeeming trait was his documented deep love for Joséphine whom he continued to adore even after he was forced to seperate from her when she could not produce an heir. Despite his mass murder and cruelty to others Napoleon would have never raised a hand against her as Scott’s film depicts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Tavington from ''Film/ThePatriot''. While [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banastre_Tarleton Banastre Tarleton]], the historical counterpart to Colonel Tavington, was notoriously ruthless (c.f. his actions at the Waxhaws Massacre and his fervent support for the Slave Trade as an MP), the film greatly exaggerates his actual misdeeds. Some of the worst atrocities presented in the film were in fact inspired by the ones committed by the Nazis in World War 2: erasing entire villages, locking all the townsfolk into their church and burning it down, etc.

to:

* Tavington from ''Film/ThePatriot''.''Film/ThePatriot2000''. While [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banastre_Tarleton Banastre Tarleton]], the historical counterpart to Colonel Tavington, was notoriously ruthless (c.f. his actions at the Waxhaws Massacre and his fervent support for the Slave Trade as an MP), the film greatly exaggerates his actual misdeeds. Some of the worst atrocities presented in the film were in fact inspired by the ones committed by the Nazis in World War 2: erasing entire villages, locking all the townsfolk into their church and burning it down, etc.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* UsefulNotes/KingJohnOfEngland gets a colossal amount of this across the ages and works of fiction (even rivalling Richard III), most notably Myth/RobinHood films and shows where he's the BigBad and films like ''Film/IronClad'' all depict him as a tyranical despot and sadistic ruler. Now suffice to say the real John was not a saint being quite the alienating {{Jerkass}} whom was very OvershadowedByAwesome in reality by his badass older brother UsefulNotes/RichardTheLionheart whom people highly preferred; but much like Commodus, John was far more incompetent than he was actually evil and he really wasn't TheCaligula that films make him out to be. Ironically as Churchhill once noted without John's failings as king, he wouldn't have been forced to sign the Magna Carter which limiting his powers and, in consequence, the power of all future English monarchs. Giving more freedom to non-royalty.
** Relatedly, the High Sheriff of Nottinghamshire who served King John most likely William de Wendenal (although it's more than likely the sheriff is a CompositeCharacter of multiple real life people who occupied the post) is commonly depicted in Robin Hood films as a psychopathic, rapey bastard FeudalOverlord and the ArchEnemy of Robin. While many of the sheriffs of that time were corrupt[[labelnote:*]] Ironically many of them rebelled againist John and became outlaws themselves [[/labelnote]], there's still no accounts saturday morning cartoon villain antics from de Wendenal and his position in Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire would have made him one of the most important and influential officials of the land during the years of King Richard's absence from the country. Indeed from what little historians have gathered the High Sheriff of Nottinghamshire, he was actually in support of Richard rather than againist him as most films, tv-shows and folklore depict.

Added: 1445

Removed: 1445

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/OutlawKing'': [[DownplayedTrope Downplayed]] as per [[UsefulNotes/EdwardTheFirst King Edward I]], and somewhat played straight with his son [[UsefulNotes/TheHouseOfPlantagenet Edward, Prince of Wales]].
** In clear contrast to previous and stereotypical depictions of Edward I, he has visible moments of being a ReasonableAuthorityFigure and the OnlySaneMan in his court. He will, at most instances, try to give his opponents a chance to redeem themselves to him and profess their loyalty. If they fail/backstab him, however, he will punish them--[[TheGlovesComeOff utterly and without scruples]]. Many of his brutal actions and policies, accurate to history, remain consistent with this.
** On the other hand, Prince Edward (based on records) is actually OutOfFocus in historical records during this period. It cannot be credibly established whether he played a major role in the Scottish campaigns under his father (especially since scholarly consensus suggest he was textbook IdleRich at best). In this film, he is seen to be actively making the effort to contribute to the war project--if ineffectually. There's no evidence for the real Prince Edward being this sadistic, either then or later as king. He in fact frequently delegated his duties and was a reluctant ruler. The real man was well known for [[NiceToTheWaiter generosity toward his household staff]] and chatting with commoners, something people during the era criticized.


Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/OutlawKing'': [[DownplayedTrope Downplayed]] as per [[UsefulNotes/EdwardTheFirst King Edward I]], and somewhat played straight with his son [[UsefulNotes/TheHouseOfPlantagenet Edward, Prince of Wales]].
** In clear contrast to previous and stereotypical depictions of Edward I, he has visible moments of being a ReasonableAuthorityFigure and the OnlySaneMan in his court. He will, at most instances, try to give his opponents a chance to redeem themselves to him and profess their loyalty. If they fail/backstab him, however, he will punish them--[[TheGlovesComeOff utterly and without scruples]]. Many of his brutal actions and policies, accurate to history, remain consistent with this.
** On the other hand, Prince Edward (based on records) is actually OutOfFocus in historical records during this period. It cannot be credibly established whether he played a major role in the Scottish campaigns under his father (especially since scholarly consensus suggest he was textbook IdleRich at best). In this film, he is seen to be actively making the effort to contribute to the war project--if ineffectually. There's no evidence for the real Prince Edward being this sadistic, either then or later as king. He in fact frequently delegated his duties and was a reluctant ruler. The real man was well known for [[NiceToTheWaiter generosity toward his household staff]] and chatting with commoners, something people during the era criticized.

Added: 1555

Changed: 7

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/{{Oppenheimer}}'' is generally extremely good at empathising the real word moral greyness and layered complexity to the people it portrays, largely without falling into cliche. However a couple of real life figures did not escape this.

to:

* ''Film/{{Oppenheimer}}'' is generally extremely good at empathising the real word moral greyness and layered complexity to the people it portrays, largely without falling into cliche. However a couple few of real life figures did not escape this.


Added DiffLines:

** The film portrays Colonel (later [[RankUp General]]) Nichols as an active and willing participant in Strauss's scheme to revoke Oppenheimer's security clearance, suggesting he and Strauss leaked information that would allow Oppenheimer's reputation to be tarnished. In reality, Nichols always stated that the information came from elsewhere, he would never have launched an investigation in the first place and expressed disappointment that he indirectly was ever involved with ruining a good man's reputation.
** [[ZigZaggingTrope Zig-zagged]] with President Harry Truman: the film portrays him as being [[NoSympathy totally callous]] about the human suffering in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, mocking Oppenheimer for his regrets over the bombings. It is true that Truman insisted that the bombings were necessary and that many historians have questioned his motivations for this viewpoint, but he ''was'' well aware of the terrible weight of this decision, going so far as to suggest that the atom bomb might be responsible for the biblical apocalypse, a stark contrast with the film's depiction of Truman, framed as having nastier ulterior philosophies. With all that said, Truman's behavior towards Oppenheimer in the film is actually ''toned down'' from how the exchange went in real life -- by all accounts, the real Truman was even less tolerant of Oppenheimer's angst, saying to Secretary of State Dean Acheson "Never bring [[PrecisionFStrike that fucking cretin]] in here again. He did not drop the bomb. I did. That kind of weepiness makes me sick."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Lewis Strauss is the hardest hit in the film. While it is true he had vendetta against Oppenheimer (whom had openly humiliated him) and tried hard to get him accused and arrested as a Soviet spy, in reality Strauss wasn’t so despicable and petulant as the film makes him out to be and much like Oppenheimer he had a mixture of noble and flawed traits. Firstly there’s the fact he was also from Jewish descent himself and was a member of the American Jewish Committee whom lobbied hard to change U.S policy to accept more Jewish refugees from Germany and was also one of the very few top players to advocate that the atomic bomb not be dropped on a city but on an uninhabited island instead as a demonstration to the Japanese — an action Oppenheimer himself was ''against'' at the time. The film greatly omits these altruistic traits from Strauss to focus solely on his jerkassery and egotism in order to put his foil Oppenheimer in a better light.

to:

** Lewis Strauss is the hardest hit in the film. While it is true he had a vendetta against Oppenheimer (whom had openly humiliated him) and tried hard to get him accused and arrested as a Soviet spy, in reality Strauss wasn’t so despicable and petulant as the film makes him out to be and much like Oppenheimer he had a mixture of noble and flawed traits. Firstly there’s the fact he was also from Jewish descent himself and was a member of the American Jewish Committee whom lobbied hard to change U.S policy to accept more Jewish refugees from Germany and was also one of the very few top players to advocate that the atomic bomb not be dropped on a city but on an uninhabited island instead as a demonstration to the Japanese — an action Oppenheimer himself was ''against'' at the time. The film greatly omits these altruistic traits from Strauss to focus solely on his jerkassery and egotism in order to put his foil Oppenheimer in a better light.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Henry Stimson has a potent example of this. During the haunting U.S council of where they should drop the bombs in Japan, Stimson cheerfully recommends they spare Kyoto, saying he and his wife enjoyed their visit there. The line was suggested by Stimson‘a actor James Remar and supported by Nolan to highlight the appalling casualness of this atrocity regarding numerous innocent human lives. In actual fact Stimson actually lobbied to spare the city understanding the deep cultural significance it had to the Japanese likely influenced by the acclaimed historian Langdon Warner whom was the one making a persuasive and genuine case to spare Kyoto to the American military (for which Warner would be venerated in Japan).

to:

** Henry Stimson has a potent example of this. During the haunting U.S council of where they should drop the bombs in Japan, Stimson cheerfully recommends they spare Kyoto, saying he and his wife enjoyed their visit there. The line was suggested by Stimson‘a Stimson‘s actor James Remar and supported by Nolan to highlight the appalling casualness of this atrocity regarding numerous innocent human lives. In actual fact Stimson actually lobbied to spare the city understanding the deep cultural significance it had to the Japanese likely influenced by the acclaimed historian Langdon Warner whom was the one making a persuasive and genuine case to spare Kyoto to the American military (for which Warner would be venerated in Japan).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/{{Oppenheimer}}'' is generally extremely good at empathising the real word moral greyness and layered complexity to the people it portrays, largely without falling into cliche. However a couple of real life figures did not escape this.
** Lewis Strauss is the hardest hit in the film. While it is true he had vendetta against Oppenheimer (whom had openly humiliated him) and tried hard to get him accused and arrested as a Soviet spy, in reality Strauss wasn’t so despicable and petulant as the film makes him out to be and much like Oppenheimer he had a mixture of noble and flawed traits. Firstly there’s the fact he was also from Jewish descent himself and was a member of the American Jewish Committee whom lobbied hard to change U.S policy to accept more Jewish refugees from Germany and was also one of the very few top players to advocate that the atomic bomb not be dropped on a city but on an uninhabited island instead as a demonstration to the Japanese — an action Oppenheimer himself was ''against'' at the time. The film greatly omits these altruistic traits from Strauss to focus solely on his jerkassery and egotism in order to put his foil Oppenheimer in a better light.
** Henry Stimson has a potent example of this. During the haunting U.S council of where they should drop the bombs in Japan, Stimson cheerfully recommends they spare Kyoto, saying he and his wife enjoyed their visit there. The line was suggested by Stimson‘a actor James Remar and supported by Nolan to highlight the appalling casualness of this atrocity regarding numerous innocent human lives. In actual fact Stimson actually lobbied to spare the city understanding the deep cultural significance it had to the Japanese likely influenced by the acclaimed historian Langdon Warner whom was the one making a persuasive and genuine case to spare Kyoto to the American military (for which Warner would be venerated in Japan).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Film/AmericanSniper'', Chris Kyle is dogged throughout his career by his ArchEnemy Mustafa, a Syrian sniper and former Olympic medalist, who he finally defeats in an epic SniperDuel across Baghdad just before shipping back home for good. In reality, there was a Syrian sniper and former medalist called Mustafa in Iraq, but to the best of anyone’s knowledge, Kyle never crossed paths with him, and if he did he couldn't possibly have known, and he's mentioned in Kyle's book a grand total of once. Kyle didn't even kill him, a different Navy Seal sniper did, or rather, the other sniper shot someone they were all fairly sure was Mustafa, since it's not like the body was wearing a name tag. Presumably, the filmmakers decided Kyle needed a nemesis for the sake of drama, and Mustafa was too attractive an EvilCounterpart to pass up.

to:

* In ''Film/AmericanSniper'', Chris Kyle is dogged throughout his career by his ArchEnemy Mustafa, a Syrian sniper and former Olympic medalist, who he finally defeats in an epic SniperDuel across Baghdad just before shipping back home for good. In reality, there was a Syrian sniper and former medalist called Olympian named Mustafa in Iraq, but to the best of anyone’s knowledge, Kyle never crossed paths with him, and if he did he couldn't possibly have known, and he's mentioned in Kyle's book a grand total of once. Kyle didn't even kill him, a different Navy Seal sniper did, or rather, the other sniper shot someone they were all fairly sure was Mustafa, since it's not like the body was wearing a name tag. Presumably, the filmmakers decided Kyle needed a nemesis for the sake of drama, and Mustafa was too attractive an EvilCounterpart to pass up.

Top