Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
** because then we wouldn't have a movie.
** Sure we would. Dukhovich could have had a fanatically-loyal lieutenant working to kill Kincaid instead of Dukhovich calling all the shots personally. ''Film/AirForceOne'' has a similar "free the dictator" background for its immediate action, and the dictator in that has nothing to do with organizing the action.
** Sure we would. Dukhovich could have had a fanatically-loyal lieutenant working to kill Kincaid instead of Dukhovich calling all the shots personally. ''Film/AirForceOne'' has a similar "free the dictator" background for its immediate action, and the dictator in that has nothing to do with organizing the action.
to:
** because Because then we wouldn't have a movie.
** *** Sure we would. Dukhovich could have had a fanatically-loyal lieutenant working to kill Kincaid instead of Dukhovich calling all the shots personally. ''Film/AirForceOne'' has a similar "free the dictator" background for its immediate action, and the dictator in that has nothing to do with organizing the action.
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
** Dukhovich also takes pride in his humble origins, so he may have been a soldier himself, or have done some dirty work. And it’s much more sadistic to personally commit the kill.
to:
** Dukhovich also takes pride in his humble origins, so he may have been a soldier himself, or have done some dirty work. And it’s much more sadistic to he probably enjoys personally commit the kill.killing his enemies and also women and children.
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
** The pay must be really good.
to:
** The pay must be really good. If Dukhovich is freed and regains power in Belarus, he will have plenty of resources to reward the mercs with and may even make them his personal army or bodyguard service. Also, a huge chunk of them are former Belarusian Army who may be facing charges and losing their livelihoods themselves if Dukhovich loses and want him back so they get their jobs back, along with some money.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
** There may be a few opponents who still love the current flag.
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* Why are the mercenaries this dedicated? Mercenaries aren't fighting for an ideology or belief, they fight to get paid. Dozens, possibly hundreds, of them are killed off over the course of the movie but at no point do they ever seem to consider that this job isn't worth the pay. And even if they ''do'' survive and get paid, their company are now international criminals.
to:
** Dukhovich also takes pride in his humble origins, so he may have been a soldier himself, or have done some dirty work. And it’s much more sadistic to personally commit the kill.
* Why are the mercenaries this dedicated? Mercenaries aren't fighting for an ideology or belief, they fight to get paid. Dozens, possibly hundreds, of them are killed off over the course of the movie but at no point do they ever seem to consider that this job isn't worth the pay. And even if they ''do'' survive and get paid, their company are now internationalcriminals.criminals.
** The pay must be really good.
* Why are the mercenaries this dedicated? Mercenaries aren't fighting for an ideology or belief, they fight to get paid. Dozens, possibly hundreds, of them are killed off over the course of the movie but at no point do they ever seem to consider that this job isn't worth the pay. And even if they ''do'' survive and get paid, their company are now international
** The pay must be really good.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Sam Jackson is hard to miss, they probably just saw his face.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
** Because he's an evil bastard who wants to do it himself. Why does he need a reason beyond that?
to:
** Because he's an evil bastard who wants to do it himself. Why does he need a reason beyond that?that?
* Why are the mercenaries this dedicated? Mercenaries aren't fighting for an ideology or belief, they fight to get paid. Dozens, possibly hundreds, of them are killed off over the course of the movie but at no point do they ever seem to consider that this job isn't worth the pay. And even if they ''do'' survive and get paid, their company are now international criminals.
* Why are the mercenaries this dedicated? Mercenaries aren't fighting for an ideology or belief, they fight to get paid. Dozens, possibly hundreds, of them are killed off over the course of the movie but at no point do they ever seem to consider that this job isn't worth the pay. And even if they ''do'' survive and get paid, their company are now international criminals.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** Kincaid established that he only kills people he finds to be evil. Given the crimes Dukovich was guilty of, it's safe to assume he's the most evil man Kincaid has ever come across. Given that Dukhovich has been trying to kill Kincaid for the last couple of days and [[spoiler:he shot Bryce]], it comes to no surprise that he would want to make sure Dukovich gets what's coming to him.
to:
** Kincaid established that he only kills people he finds to be evil. Given the crimes Dukovich Dukhovich was guilty of, it's safe to assume he's the most evil man Kincaid has ever come across. Given that Dukhovich has been trying to kill Kincaid for the last couple of days and [[spoiler:he shot Bryce]], it comes to no surprise that he would want to make sure Dukovich gets what's coming to him.
Added DiffLines:
** Interpol's Assistant Director is TheMole in the agency, so it's likely he pulled some strings to put Dukhovich in minimum security.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* One thing I need to understand with the EstablishingCharacterMoment for Dukhovich is, why does he personally shoot the dissident professor's wife and kids, rather than have one of his men do it?
to:
* One thing I need to understand with the EstablishingCharacterMoment for Dukhovich is, why does he personally shoot the dissident professor's wife and kids, rather than have one of his men do it?it?
** Because he's an evil bastard who wants to do it himself. Why does he need a reason beyond that?
** Because he's an evil bastard who wants to do it himself. Why does he need a reason beyond that?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* How were Dumhovich's mooks able to find Kincaid over and over again? It's understandable when he still had a cellphone on him, but how could they detect him in a normal car going down the highway?
to:
* How were Dumhovich's Dukhovich's mooks able to find Kincaid over and over again? It's understandable when he still had a cellphone on him, but how could they detect him in a normal car going down the highway?highway?
* One thing I need to understand with the EstablishingCharacterMoment for Dukhovich is, why does he personally shoot the dissident professor's wife and kids, rather than have one of his men do it?
* One thing I need to understand with the EstablishingCharacterMoment for Dukhovich is, why does he personally shoot the dissident professor's wife and kids, rather than have one of his men do it?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
** Sure we would. Dukhovich could have had a fanatically-loyal lieutenant working to kill Kincaid instead of Dukhovich calling all the shots personally. ''Film/AirForceOne'' has a similar "free the dictator" background for its immediate action, and the dictator in that has nothing to do with organizing the action.
to:
** Sure we would. Dukhovich could have had a fanatically-loyal lieutenant working to kill Kincaid instead of Dukhovich calling all the shots personally. ''Film/AirForceOne'' has a similar "free the dictator" background for its immediate action, and the dictator in that has nothing to do with organizing the action.action.
* How were Dumhovich's mooks able to find Kincaid over and over again? It's understandable when he still had a cellphone on him, but how could they detect him in a normal car going down the highway?
* How were Dumhovich's mooks able to find Kincaid over and over again? It's understandable when he still had a cellphone on him, but how could they detect him in a normal car going down the highway?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** because then we wouldn't have a movie.
to:
** because then we wouldn't have a movie.movie.
** Sure we would. Dukhovich could have had a fanatically-loyal lieutenant working to kill Kincaid instead of Dukhovich calling all the shots personally. ''Film/AirForceOne'' has a similar "free the dictator" background for its immediate action, and the dictator in that has nothing to do with organizing the action.
** Sure we would. Dukhovich could have had a fanatically-loyal lieutenant working to kill Kincaid instead of Dukhovich calling all the shots personally. ''Film/AirForceOne'' has a similar "free the dictator" background for its immediate action, and the dictator in that has nothing to do with organizing the action.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* Why wasn't Dukhovich placed in solitary and isolated so he couldn't make outside contact?
to:
* Why wasn't Dukhovich placed in solitary and isolated so he couldn't make outside contact?contact?
**because then we wouldn't have a movie.
**because then we wouldn't have a movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** Kincaid established that he only kills people he finds to be evil. Given the crimes Dukovich was guilty of, it's safe to assume he's the most evil man Kincaid has ever come across. Given that Dukhovich has been trying to kill Kincaid for the last couple of days and [[spoiler:he shot Bryce]], it comes to no surprise that he would want to make sure Dukovich gets what's coming to him.
to:
** Kincaid established that he only kills people he finds to be evil. Given the crimes Dukovich was guilty of, it's safe to assume he's the most evil man Kincaid has ever come across. Given that Dukhovich has been trying to kill Kincaid for the last couple of days and [[spoiler:he shot Bryce]], it comes to no surprise that he would want to make sure Dukovich gets what's coming to him.him.
* Why wasn't Dukhovich placed in solitary and isolated so he couldn't make outside contact?
* Why wasn't Dukhovich placed in solitary and isolated so he couldn't make outside contact?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) from:
** This Troper would guess that they went with the flag they found when they Googled "Belarus."
* Why did Kincaid go full on RoaringRampageOfRevenge at Dukhovich at the end? Was it just because he was a bad man and was maybe getting away? Did he fell he owed a debt of honor to Bryce after the latter [[spoiler:took a bullet for him?]] This Troper doesn't understand the context of that last action scene.
* Why did Kincaid go full on RoaringRampageOfRevenge at Dukhovich at the end? Was it just because he was a bad man and was maybe getting away? Did he fell he owed a debt of honor to Bryce after the latter [[spoiler:took a bullet for him?]] This Troper doesn't understand the context of that last action scene.
to:
* Why did Kincaid go full on RoaringRampageOfRevenge at Dukhovich at the end? Was it just because he was a bad man and was maybe getting away? Did he fell he owed a debt of honor to Bryce after the latter [[spoiler:took a bullet for
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 3 (click to see context) :
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** Kincaid established that he only kills people he finds to be evil. Given the crimes Dukovich was guilty of, it's safe to assume he's the most evil man Kincaid has ever come across. Given that Dukhovich has been trying to kill Kincaid for the last couple of days and [[spoiler:he shot Bryce]], it comes to no surprise that he would want to make sure Dukovich gets what's comin to him.
to:
** Kincaid established that he only kills people he finds to be evil. Given the crimes Dukovich was guilty of, it's safe to assume he's the most evil man Kincaid has ever come across. Given that Dukhovich has been trying to kill Kincaid for the last couple of days and [[spoiler:he shot Bryce]], it comes to no surprise that he would want to make sure Dukovich gets what's comin coming to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
* Why did Kincaid go full on [[RampageOfRevenge]] at Dukhovich at the end? Was it just because he was a bad man and was maybe getting away? Did he fell he owed a debt of honor to Bryce after the latter [[spoiler:took a bullet for him?]] This Troper doesn't understand the context of that last action scene.
** Kincaid established that he only kills people he finds to be evil. Given the crimes Dukovich was guilty of, it's safe to assume he's the most evil man Kincaid has ever come across. Given that Dukhovich has been trying to kill Kincaid for the last couple of days and he shot Bryce, it comes to no surprise that he would want to make sure Dukovich gets what's comin to him.
** Kincaid established that he only kills people he finds to be evil. Given the crimes Dukovich was guilty of, it's safe to assume he's the most evil man Kincaid has ever come across. Given that Dukhovich has been trying to kill Kincaid for the last couple of days and he shot Bryce, it comes to no surprise that he would want to make sure Dukovich gets what's comin to him.
to:
* Why did Kincaid go full on [[RampageOfRevenge]] RoaringRampageOfRevenge at Dukhovich at the end? Was it just because he was a bad man and was maybe getting away? Did he fell he owed a debt of honor to Bryce after the latter [[spoiler:took a bullet for him?]] This Troper doesn't understand the context of that last action scene.
** Kincaid established that he only kills people he finds to be evil. Given the crimes Dukovich was guilty of, it's safe to assume he's the most evil man Kincaid has ever come across. Given that Dukhovich has been trying to kill Kincaid for the last couple of days andhe [[spoiler:he shot Bryce, Bryce]], it comes to no surprise that he would want to make sure Dukovich gets what's comin to him.
** Kincaid established that he only kills people he finds to be evil. Given the crimes Dukovich was guilty of, it's safe to assume he's the most evil man Kincaid has ever come across. Given that Dukhovich has been trying to kill Kincaid for the last couple of days and
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
* Why did Kincaid go full on RampageOfRevenge at Dukhovich at the end? Was it just because he was a bad man and was maybe getting away? Did he fell he owed a debt of honor to Bryce after the latter [[spoiler:TakingaBullet|took a bullet for him?]] This Troper doesn't understand the context of that last action scene.
Kincaid established that he only kills people he finds to be evil. Given the crimes Dukovich was guilty of, it's safe to assume he's the most evil man Kincaid has ever come across. Given that Dukhovich has been trying to kill Kincaid for the last couple of days and he shot Bryce, it comes to no surprise that he would want to make sure Dukovich gets what's comin to him.
Kincaid established that he only kills people he finds to be evil. Given the crimes Dukovich was guilty of, it's safe to assume he's the most evil man Kincaid has ever come across. Given that Dukhovich has been trying to kill Kincaid for the last couple of days and he shot Bryce, it comes to no surprise that he would want to make sure Dukovich gets what's comin to him.
to:
* Why did Kincaid go full on RampageOfRevenge [[RampageOfRevenge]] at Dukhovich at the end? Was it just because he was a bad man and was maybe getting away? Did he fell he owed a debt of honor to Bryce after the latter [[spoiler:TakingaBullet|took [[spoiler:took a bullet for him?]] This Troper doesn't understand the context of that last action scene.
Kincaid **Kincaid established that he only kills people he finds to be evil. Given the crimes Dukovich was guilty of, it's safe to assume he's the most evil man Kincaid has ever come across. Given that Dukhovich has been trying to kill Kincaid for the last couple of days and he shot Bryce, it comes to no surprise that he would want to make sure Dukovich gets what's comin to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* Why did Kincaid go full on RampageOfRevenge at Dukhovich at the end? Was it just because he was a bad man and was maybe getting away? Did he fell he owed a debt of honor to Bryce after the latter [[TakingaBullet|took a bullet for him?]] This Troper doesn't understand the context of that last action scene.
to:
* Why did Kincaid go full on RampageOfRevenge at Dukhovich at the end? Was it just because he was a bad man and was maybe getting away? Did he fell he owed a debt of honor to Bryce after the latter [[TakingaBullet|took [[spoiler:TakingaBullet|took a bullet for him?]] This Troper doesn't understand the context of that last action scene.scene.
Kincaid established that he only kills people he finds to be evil. Given the crimes Dukovich was guilty of, it's safe to assume he's the most evil man Kincaid has ever come across. Given that Dukhovich has been trying to kill Kincaid for the last couple of days and he shot Bryce, it comes to no surprise that he would want to make sure Dukovich gets what's comin to him.
Kincaid established that he only kills people he finds to be evil. Given the crimes Dukovich was guilty of, it's safe to assume he's the most evil man Kincaid has ever come across. Given that Dukhovich has been trying to kill Kincaid for the last couple of days and he shot Bryce, it comes to no surprise that he would want to make sure Dukovich gets what's comin to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* In the movie the people gathered in front of the court were protesting against the PresidentEvil of Belarus. They are holding the current Belarusian flag. In real life, opponents to the regime in Belarus refuse to use that flag (as it was the former Soviet Belarus flag and forced upon the people in a rigged election), preferring to use the white-red-white flag in use from 1991-1995 [[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/belarus-activists-arrested-before-planned-protest/2017/03/25/98e3f6da-114e-11e7-aa57-2ca1b05c41b8_story.html?utm_term=.69e8fb386d2e]]. Is this a case of ArtisticLicenseHistory or something?
to:
* In the movie the people gathered in front of the court were protesting against the PresidentEvil of Belarus. They are holding the current Belarusian flag. In real life, opponents to the regime in Belarus refuse to use that flag (as it was the former Soviet Belarus flag and forced upon the people in a rigged election), preferring to use the white-red-white flag in use from 1991-1995 [[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/belarus-activists-arrested-before-planned-protest/2017/03/25/98e3f6da-114e-11e7-aa57-2ca1b05c41b8_story.html?utm_term=.69e8fb386d2e]]. Is this a case of ArtisticLicenseHistory or something?something?
** This Troper would guess that they went with the flag they found when they Googled "Belarus."
* Why did Kincaid go full on RampageOfRevenge at Dukhovich at the end? Was it just because he was a bad man and was maybe getting away? Did he fell he owed a debt of honor to Bryce after the latter [[TakingaBullet|took a bullet for him?]] This Troper doesn't understand the context of that last action scene.
** This Troper would guess that they went with the flag they found when they Googled "Belarus."
* Why did Kincaid go full on RampageOfRevenge at Dukhovich at the end? Was it just because he was a bad man and was maybe getting away? Did he fell he owed a debt of honor to Bryce after the latter [[TakingaBullet|took a bullet for him?]] This Troper doesn't understand the context of that last action scene.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* In the movie the people gathered in front of the court were protesting against the PresidentEvil of Belarus. They are holding the current Belarusian flag. In real life, opponents to the regime in Belarus refuse to use that flag (as it was the former Soviet Belarus flag and forced upon the people in a rigged election), preferring to use the white-red-white flag in use from 1991-1995 [[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/belarus-activists-arrested-before-planned-protest/2017/03/25/98e3f6da-114e-11e7-aa57-2ca1b05c41b8_story.html?utm_term=.69e8fb386d2e]]. Is this a case of artisticlicense-history or something?
to:
* In the movie the people gathered in front of the court were protesting against the PresidentEvil of Belarus. They are holding the current Belarusian flag. In real life, opponents to the regime in Belarus refuse to use that flag (as it was the former Soviet Belarus flag and forced upon the people in a rigged election), preferring to use the white-red-white flag in use from 1991-1995 [[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/belarus-activists-arrested-before-planned-protest/2017/03/25/98e3f6da-114e-11e7-aa57-2ca1b05c41b8_story.html?utm_term=.69e8fb386d2e]]. Is this a case of artisticlicense-history ArtisticLicenseHistory or something?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* In the movie the people gathered in front of the court were protesting against the PresidentEvil of Belarus. They are holding the current Belarusian flag. In real life, opponents to the regime in Belarus refuse to use that flag (as it was the former Soviet Belarus flag and forced upon the people in a rigged election), preferring to use the white-red-white flag in use from 1991-1995 [[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/belarus-activists-arrested-before-planned-protest/2017/03/25/98e3f6da-114e-11e7-aa57-2ca1b05c41b8_story.html?utm_term=.69e8fb386d2e]]. Is this a case of artisticlicensehistory or something?
to:
* In the movie the people gathered in front of the court were protesting against the PresidentEvil of Belarus. They are holding the current Belarusian flag. In real life, opponents to the regime in Belarus refuse to use that flag (as it was the former Soviet Belarus flag and forced upon the people in a rigged election), preferring to use the white-red-white flag in use from 1991-1995 [[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/belarus-activists-arrested-before-planned-protest/2017/03/25/98e3f6da-114e-11e7-aa57-2ca1b05c41b8_story.html?utm_term=.69e8fb386d2e]]. Is this a case of artisticlicensehistory artisticlicense-history or something?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* In the movie the people gathered in front of the court were protesting against the PresidentEvil of Belarus. They are holding the current Belarusian flag. In real life, opponents to the regime in Belarus refuse to use that flag (as it was the former Soviet Belarus flag and forced upon the people in a rigged election), preferring to use the white-red-white flag in use from 1991-1995 [[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/belarus-activists-arrested-before-planned-protest/2017/03/25/98e3f6da-114e-11e7-aa57-2ca1b05c41b8_story.html?utm_term=.69e8fb386d2e]]
to:
* In the movie the people gathered in front of the court were protesting against the PresidentEvil of Belarus. They are holding the current Belarusian flag. In real life, opponents to the regime in Belarus refuse to use that flag (as it was the former Soviet Belarus flag and forced upon the people in a rigged election), preferring to use the white-red-white flag in use from 1991-1995 [[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/belarus-activists-arrested-before-planned-protest/2017/03/25/98e3f6da-114e-11e7-aa57-2ca1b05c41b8_story.html?utm_term=.69e8fb386d2e]]69e8fb386d2e]]. Is this a case of artisticlicensehistory or something?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* In the movie the people gathered at the court were protesting against the PresidentEvil of Belarus. They are holding the current Belarusian flag. In real life, opponents to the regime in Belarus refuse to use that flag (as it was the former Soviet Belarus flag and forced upon the people in a rigged election), preferring to use the white-red-white flag in use from 1991-1995 [[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/belarus-activists-arrested-before-planned-protest/2017/03/25/98e3f6da-114e-11e7-aa57-2ca1b05c41b8_story.html?utm_term=.69e8fb386d2e]]
to:
* In the movie the people gathered at in front of the court were protesting against the PresidentEvil of Belarus. They are holding the current Belarusian flag. In real life, opponents to the regime in Belarus refuse to use that flag (as it was the former Soviet Belarus flag and forced upon the people in a rigged election), preferring to use the white-red-white flag in use from 1991-1995 [[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/belarus-activists-arrested-before-planned-protest/2017/03/25/98e3f6da-114e-11e7-aa57-2ca1b05c41b8_story.html?utm_term=.69e8fb386d2e]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* In the movie the people gathered at the court were protesting against the PresidentEvil of Belarus. They are holding the current Belarusian flag. In real life, opponents to the regime in Belarus refuse to use that flag (as it was the former Soviet Belarus flag and forced upon the people in a rigged election), preferring to use the white-red-white flag in use from 1991-1995.
to:
* In the movie the people gathered at the court were protesting against the PresidentEvil of Belarus. They are holding the current Belarusian flag. In real life, opponents to the regime in Belarus refuse to use that flag (as it was the former Soviet Belarus flag and forced upon the people in a rigged election), preferring to use the white-red-white flag in use from 1991-1995.1991-1995 [[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/belarus-activists-arrested-before-planned-protest/2017/03/25/98e3f6da-114e-11e7-aa57-2ca1b05c41b8_story.html?utm_term=.69e8fb386d2e]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
In the movie the people gathered at the court were protesting against the President Evil of Belarus. They are holding the current Belarusian flag. In real life, opponents to the regime in Belarus refuse to use that flag (as it was the former Soviet Belarus flag and forced upon the people in a rigged election), preferring to use the white-red-white flag in use from 1991-1995.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
In the movie the people gathered at the court were protesting against the President Evil of Belarus. They are holding the current Belarusian flag. In real life, opponents to the regime in Belarus refuse to use that flag (as it was the former Soviet Belarus flag and forced upon the people in a rigged election), preferring to use the white-red-white flag in use from 1991-1995.
