Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / StarTrek2009

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In reply to the question regarding "Admiral Archer's Prize Beagle" they never specify that it's the dog from Enterprise. Archer could have gotten another beagle during those 100 years.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** JimmyStewart (yes, ''that'' JimmyStewart) went from Private to Colonel in four years, a rise that's considered ''extremely'' rapid. Cadet to Captain in five seconds is beyond ridiculous.

to:

**** JimmyStewart Creator/JimmyStewart (yes, ''that'' JimmyStewart) Creator/JimmyStewart) went from Private to Colonel in four years, a rise that's considered ''extremely'' rapid. Cadet to Captain in five seconds is beyond ridiculous.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** I believe it's pointed out on this film's entry in SuperPersistentPredator that it appeared to initially chasing Kirk for territory. Once Kirk rolled off the cliff, the creature stopped chasing him and roared for him to stay away. However, it then slipped and fell, and presumably got mad and decided to kill him.

to:

** I believe it's pointed out on this film's entry in SuperPersistentPredator that it appeared to be initially chasing Kirk for out of its territory. Once Kirk rolled off the cliff, the creature stopped chasing him and roared for him to stay away. However, it then slipped and fell, and presumably got mad and decided to kill him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also, Nero was more than a little bit off the deep end. Like Kahn in ''Star Trek II'', he was not thinking rationally. When Pike insists that Romulus still exists (which it does in his timeline), Nero screams that it was destroyed and that he saw it be destroyed. While this is partly true; the Romulus in Nero's alternate future timeline ''was'' destroyed, he is not connecting it with the Romulus in the 23rd Century of this new timeline. Probably because if he went to Romulus, the AU versions of most of his friends and family have not even been born yet.

Added: 838

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** I'd always figured that the Kelvin, which in the words of Kirk, had formidable and advanced weaponry, survived in the first timeline but had some sort of problem with power consumption or something so they decided to tone down the weaponry since most starships didn't need quite that much dakka. However in this timeline the Kelvin was bested by the Narada and destroyed (albeit on purpose by George Kirk) so they figured that all that advanced weaponry was necessary.

to:

*** I'd always figured that the Kelvin, which in the words of Kirk, had formidable and advanced weaponry, survived in the first timeline but had some sort of problem with power consumption or something so they decided to tone down the weaponry since most starships didn't need quite that much dakka. However in this timeline the Kelvin was bested by the Narada and destroyed (albeit on purpose by George Kirk) so they figured that all that advanced weaponry was necessary.necessary.
** Also of note: the "family-friendly" Starfleet culture would not arise until the 24th Century in the original timeline. Even if Kirk's mother were a Starfleet crewman, it is highly unlikely that she would have been allowed to remain aboard ship so late into her pregnancy. They would have almost certainly had her disembark at a starbase or planet before she was too far along. That she was still aboard the ''Kelvin'' when she gave birth would suggest that Starfleet policy in this timeline was already significantly different. Jim Kirk was supposedly born in Iowa, presumably while his mother was on maternity leave, in the original timeline. It almost certainly would have been mentioned multiple times in past series and movies if he had literally been born aboard a starship, since that would be a very significant character point.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Because KidsAreCruel, and Vulcans are not ''naturally'' unemotional, just the opposite, they are ''very'' emotional. Vulcan children have to be taught to rein in emotional behavior, it does not come automatically. So the bullies were actually demonstrating their own failure to behave unemotionally by taunting Spock. Note that Vulcans as a species are in denial about this, because their adults tend to do this sort of thing too. They have a cultural policy of overlooking their own emotional lapses so long as they can pretend there was a "logical" reason for them.


Added DiffLines:

** Because these movies are meant to have a faster pace than a television series, and thus there is no time for gradual character development. Spock's emotional ties to his friends developed over the course of ''years'' (or even decades) in the original timeline. Here the writers needed him to bond with people he only just met. So they went massively out-of-character (for both Spock and Vulcans generally) by making him more overtly emotional.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** But what '''is''' canon is that the blast wave from a (super)nova is limited to the speed of light. So unless the star in question were ''really'' close to Romulus they should have seen it coming ''years'' in advance. After all, this is a civilization with CasualInterstellarTravel and SubspaceAnsible technology!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[folder: Why is Spock so much more comfortable with his emotions in this universe?]]
* He's grown up basically the same as Spock did in TOS (both were bullied and rejected the Vulcan Science Academy to go to Starfleet -- which pissed off Sarek). But…in TOS, Spock was ashamed for merely feeling friendship for Jim. He couldn't even tell his own mother that he loved her. And yet, here, he's comfortable enough with his emotions that not only can he admit to himself that he's in love, but he can act on it and get in a relationship with a former student. I just don't get it -- Spock in TOS is almost a decade older and yet Spock in the JJ Abrams film is already infinitely more comfortable with his feelings and expressing them. What made the difference? There's no death of George Kirk here to really explain it the way you can for Jim...
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** I'd always figured that the Kelvin, which in the words of Kirk, had formidable and advanced weaponry, survived in the first timeline but had some sort of problem with power consumption or something so they decided to tone down the weaponry since most starships didn't need quite that much dakka. However in this timeline the Kelvin was bested by the Narada and destroyed (albeit on purpose by George Kirk) so they figured that all that advanced weaponry was necessary.

Changed: 27

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* There's some major Phlebotinum Contradictions in the new film surrounding how transporters interact with shields. The hard line in standard canon is that you cannot beam to or from a ship that has its shields up; but the ''Enterprise'' engages transporters during several combat situations (once above Vulcan, and again in the final battle when Scotty retrieves Kirk, Spock and Pike). The only possible answers are that 1) the shields were not up on the ''Enterprise'' or the ''Narada''; 2) there ''are'' no shields (doubtful, since the ''Narada'' at least should have brought theirs from the "mainline" canon), or 3) you ''can'' beam through shields. Which works, since this is a reboot. But JJAbrams, could you at least mention that on screen?

to:

* There's some major Phlebotinum Contradictions in the new film surrounding how transporters interact with shields. The hard line in standard canon is that you cannot beam to or from a ship that has its shields up; but the ''Enterprise'' engages transporters during several combat situations (once above Vulcan, and again in the final battle when Scotty retrieves Kirk, Spock and Pike). The only possible answers are that 1) the shields were not up on the ''Enterprise'' or the ''Narada''; 2) there ''are'' no shields (doubtful, since the ''Narada'' at least should have brought theirs from the "mainline" canon), or 3) you ''can'' beam through shields. Which works, since this is a reboot. But JJAbrams, Creator/JJAbrams, could you at least mention that on screen?



* The size of the Enterprise. JJ Abrams seems to love saying things are huge without actually showing us. First there was Cloverfield, where he insisted the monster had to be the biggest movie monster ever, bigger than Godzilla. But we don't get much evidence of that in the movie. With all the brief shots of the thing, it's hard to tell how big it's supposed to be. And then for this movie he insisted his Enterprise had to be three times bigger than the original. But how does he illustrate this? From the outside we only ever see the ship next to things much bigger than it is, so it looks kind of small. The Enterprise D and E had more windows all over them to help give the sense of a larger ship, but this one has the same number of windows as the original that look to be the same size. So are these windows like three stories tall? The only evidence we really get of its scale is in the cavernous interiors, but from the outside it doesn't really look any bigger than the original. People complain that the drydock scene in TMP was boring, but it did a great job of illustrating the scale of the ship. You get to see it from every angle with smaller craft and people floating around working on the ship.

to:

* The size of the Enterprise. JJ Abrams Creator/JJAbrams seems to love saying things are huge without actually showing us. First there was Cloverfield, where he insisted the monster had to be the biggest movie monster ever, bigger than Godzilla. But we don't get much evidence of that in the movie. With all the brief shots of the thing, it's hard to tell how big it's supposed to be. And then for this movie he insisted his Enterprise had to be three times bigger than the original. But how does he illustrate this? From the outside we only ever see the ship next to things much bigger than it is, so it looks kind of small. The Enterprise D and E had more windows all over them to help give the sense of a larger ship, but this one has the same number of windows as the original that look to be the same size. So are these windows like three stories tall? The only evidence we really get of its scale is in the cavernous interiors, but from the outside it doesn't really look any bigger than the original. People complain that the drydock scene in TMP was boring, but it did a great job of illustrating the scale of the ship. You get to see it from every angle with smaller craft and people floating around working on the ship.



* Alright, all of the points about how Nero could have used those twenty five years more constructively can be explained away by the fact that in the deleted scenes he was a prisoner of the Klingons. His reasons for hating Spock make more sense because he felt personally betrayed by Spock in the novelization. That makes sense. What doesn't make sense is why this wasn't included in the film shown in theaters. The audience could easily notice that Nero had plenty of time to avert the annihilation of his people but apparently did nothing. Why was this cut and left for the book? Did J.J Abrams think that the audiences would revolt over an extra fifteen minutes making things more comprehensible?

to:

* Alright, all of the points about how Nero could have used those twenty five years more constructively can be explained away by the fact that in the deleted scenes he was a prisoner of the Klingons. His reasons for hating Spock make more sense because he felt personally betrayed by Spock in the novelization. That makes sense. What doesn't make sense is why this wasn't included in the film shown in theaters. The audience could easily notice that Nero had plenty of time to avert the annihilation of his people but apparently did nothing. Why was this cut and left for the book? Did J.J Abrams Creator/JJAbrams think that the audiences would revolt over an extra fifteen minutes making things more comprehensible?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Rocket lift-off requires a ship built to resist very high G-stresses; impulse drive doesn't seem to work that way. The fact that Starfleet's ships aren't built to land does not necessarily mean they're unable to withstand atmosphere and G-stresses: more likely the invention of the transporter obviated the last reason to install "landing" designs. By assembling ships planetside one avoids the need to automate (or work in spacesuits), to say nothing of saving power costs on radiation shielding, artificial gravity generation and so forth. Slightly less vulnerable to sabotage or enemy assault, too. If you have the capacity to built both orbital ''and'' planetside shipyards, why not do so?

Added: 29

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** According to what I read, Uhura was born in 2233 (same year as Kirk), Sulu was born in 2230 (same year as Spock) and Chekov was born in 2241 (which would make his age correct). I'm not sure where the other troper got their dates from, but there would be no need for this Headscratcher if these dates are correct.

to:

** According to what I read, Uhura was born in 2233 (same year as Kirk), Sulu was born in 2230 (same year as Spock) and Chekov was born in 2241 (which would make his age correct). I'm not sure where the other troper got their dates from, but there would be no need for this Headscratcher if these dates are correct. correct.
** I think TheyJustDidntCare.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Nonsense! A ''full'' Vulcan would have eschewed hyperbole, and said, "I am now one of the thousands of survivors, which is still an adequate number for all practical purposes, though it is not my intent to downplay the tragedy involved."

Added: 930

Changed: 1

Removed: 912

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Not even naturally. We've seen how much work each individual Vulcan goes to to ''get'' properly Vulcan-ish. This ''on top of'' the whole MySpeciesDothProtestTooMuch bit.

[[Did Nero move Delta Vega?]]
* Basically, there are a few shout-outs that really don't work and you can't just say "alternate universe" to ''everything.'' One, in the original series, Delta Vega was the closest planet when the ship was damaged by the barrier at the edge of the galaxy. That makes it ''impossible'' that it's a front row seat to anything happening on Vulcan. Also, Scotty got ReassignedToAntarctica because he beamed "Admiral Archer's prize beagle" somewhere. However, ''Enterprise'' predates all this by about as much as TOS predates TNG. Even if humans can live over 120 years by TNG (and look every ''minute'' of it) can a ''beagle'' live that long by TOS? These things seem quite nitpicky because most fans new to the franchise wouldn't know these things, but if you ''do'' know the franchise well enough to ''recognize'' the shout-out, that same memory tells you why it's all kinds of wrong.

to:

** Not **Not even naturally. We've seen how much work each individual Vulcan goes to to ''get'' properly Vulcan-ish. This ''on top of'' the whole MySpeciesDothProtestTooMuch bit.

[[Did Nero move Delta Vega?]]
* Basically, there are a few shout-outs that really don't work and you can't just say "alternate universe" to ''everything.'' One, in the original series, Delta Vega was the closest planet when the ship was damaged by the barrier at the edge of the galaxy. That makes it ''impossible'' that it's a front row seat to anything happening on Vulcan. Also, Scotty got ReassignedToAntarctica because he beamed "Admiral Archer's prize beagle" somewhere. However, ''Enterprise'' predates all this by about as much as TOS predates TNG. Even if humans can live over 120 years by TNG (and look every ''minute'' of it) can a ''beagle'' live that long by TOS? These things seem quite nitpicky because most fans new to the franchise wouldn't know these things, but if you ''do'' know the franchise well enough to ''recognize'' the shout-out, that same memory tells you why it's all kinds of wrong.
bit.


Added DiffLines:


[[folder: Did Nero move Delta Vega?]]
*Basically, there are a few shout-outs that really don't work and you can't just say "alternate universe" to ''everything.'' One, in the original series, Delta Vega was the closest planet when the ship was damaged by the barrier at the edge of the galaxy. That makes it ''impossible'' that it's a front row seat to anything happening on Vulcan. Also, Scotty got ReassignedToAntarctica because he beamed "Admiral Archer's prize beagle" somewhere. However, ''Enterprise'' predates all this by about as much as TOS predates TNG. Even if humans can live over 120 years by TNG (and look every ''minute'' of it) can a ''beagle'' live that long by TOS? These things seem quite nitpicky because most fans new to the franchise wouldn't know these things, but if you ''do'' know the franchise well enough to ''recognize'' the shout-out, that same memory tells you why it's all kinds of wrong.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**Not even naturally. We've seen how much work each individual Vulcan goes to to ''get'' properly Vulcan-ish. This ''on top of'' the whole MySpeciesDothProtestTooMuch bit.

[[Did Nero move Delta Vega?]]
*Basically, there are a few shout-outs that really don't work and you can't just say "alternate universe" to ''everything.'' One, in the original series, Delta Vega was the closest planet when the ship was damaged by the barrier at the edge of the galaxy. That makes it ''impossible'' that it's a front row seat to anything happening on Vulcan. Also, Scotty got ReassignedToAntarctica because he beamed "Admiral Archer's prize beagle" somewhere. However, ''Enterprise'' predates all this by about as much as TOS predates TNG. Even if humans can live over 120 years by TNG (and look every ''minute'' of it) can a ''beagle'' live that long by TOS? These things seem quite nitpicky because most fans new to the franchise wouldn't know these things, but if you ''do'' know the franchise well enough to ''recognize'' the shout-out, that same memory tells you why it's all kinds of wrong.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Because it was carrying enough ordinance to break up a lot of large asteroids? I suspect the Nerada's "torpedoes" were actually mining charges. They lacked the characteristic photon torpedo glow, and were vulnerable to point defense. Both of which suggest they lacked the shields that Trek torpedoes normally have. Which would make sense if they were designed as a tool rather than a weapon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** The Alpha Quadrant probably has hundreds of minor species that never caused any trouble or colonized other planets.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** I find it works better if you substitute "Fate" for "Q." Wouldn't be the first time one of them interfered with the progression of history.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** According to the supplementary materials, sure. But to paraphrase SFDebris "You don't get credit for what you don't put in the movie because, and I'll try to explain this carefully, ''you didn't put it in the movie''". Even if you didn't have time/the budget to show Nero's capture, you could have the crew talk about how the Klingons had cost them all that time they could have used to save Romulus.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Clarified by [[WordOfGod the writers]]; Kirk's eye color changed because of low level exposure to radiation due to the Narada's arrival and being born in a shuttle. His mother had been on meds to hold off his birth until they got back to Earth, and the attack triggered early labor. So yeah, you can blame Nero of the color change, at least on Kirk's side. Can't say McCoy's is justified really yet.

to:

*** Clarified by [[WordOfGod the writers]]; Kirk's eye color changed because of low level exposure to radiation due to the Narada's arrival and being born in a shuttle. His mother had been on meds to hold off his birth until they got back to Earth, and the attack triggered early labor. So yeah, you can blame Nero of the color change, at least on Kirk's side. Can't say McCoy's [=McCoy=]'s is justified really yet.
Willbyr MOD

Changed: 20

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Hottip cleanup; see thread for details.


*** This clarifies this. Plus it makes me think about a Series/DoctorWho story[[hottip:*:Blink]] where victims are sent back in time far enough so that when the present day rolls around, the victims are too old to live, a secondary meaning to "impossible to get them back"

to:

*** This clarifies this. Plus it makes me think about a Series/DoctorWho story[[hottip:*:Blink]] story[[note]]"Blink"[[/note]] where victims are sent back in time far enough so that when the present day rolls around, the victims are too old to live, a secondary meaning to "impossible to get them back"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***Clarified by [[WordOfGod the writers]]; Kirk's eye color changed because of low level exposure to radiation due to the Narada's arrival and being born in a shuttle. His mother had been on meds to hold off his birth until they got back to Earth, and the attack triggered early labor. So yeah, you can blame Nero of the color change, at least on Kirk's side. Can't say McCoy's is justified really yet.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The whole alternate reality thing really confused me too, and there seems to be nothing that would make a red matter wormhole different from something like the wormhole in "Yesterday's Enterprise", where the time travel immediately causes the altered timeline to overwrite the original one without anyone (except special cases like Guinan) even realizing that something's wrong. This film flies in the face of whatever sense you could have previously made of Trek's already-confusing time travel mechanics, which seemed to work on a "Back to the Future"-esque system.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** I would have to say that since 1) every ship we currently have that has gone into space was built on the surface and 2) you have no real idea what Federation technology is like that would make the process efficient, inefficient, or anything else, your definition of stupidity is merely your own opinion. It's not that they didn't care, it's that they didn't agree with your viewpoint, the same as the replying troper didn't.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Alternately, there is a translation convention, but it has to do with the way that Sarek actually does speak English. Perhaps in the original timeline he learned English from an American, but because of some quirk of fate or whatnot he learned it from an Englishman in the alternate timeline. Better, O Watsonian?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Firstly, this is a new movie, not a new series. Slightly different plotting and pacing is required. Second, as has been pointed out, if you're going to adhere to a demand for realistic military procedure of promotion and behavior to the point of making a headscratcher and refusing any and all possible explanations for it while just going "No it's wrong it's wrong it's ''wrong''", then Star Trek is just not for you. Star Trek is and always has been a light touch on military ranks and protocol to give some organization to exploration fantasy... it is not a primer on realistic military advancement through the ranks, is not intended to be, and if that's going to be such a bone of contention for you just give up on the series now.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Beware SmallReferencePools. Kirk doesn't traverse more than a handful of miles of his own part of Iowa. Are you saying there are no flat stretches of land in the entire state and the whole thing is composed of rolling GhibliHills? If so, that must do a real number on your gas mileage.

Added: 401

Changed: 7

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


:::I can see why they deleted that scene: When the first thing we see our hero doing is stealing and destroying someone else's property, we certainly would NOT want any information allowing us to see this on-the-face-of-it reprehensible action in the light of extenuating circumstances that make it okay. Otherwise, the hero would be in serious danger of setting a sympathetic first impression.

to:

:::I *** I can see why they deleted that scene: When the first thing we see our hero doing is stealing and destroying someone else's property, we certainly would NOT want any information allowing us to see this on-the-face-of-it reprehensible action in the light of extenuating circumstances that make it okay. Otherwise, the hero would be in serious danger of setting a sympathetic first impression.impression.
*** 1) We're supposed to have a somewhat negative impression of Kirk in this version, they're very much playing up his "renegade bad boy" aspects, and 2) some of us grew up watching FerrisBuellersDayOff back before [=NuMorality=] decided the DeanBitterman principal was the real hero, so we're not inclined to demand a rowdy kid dance a gallows jig just because he bent some rules and busted up a car.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Nero's crew is as driven and insane as he is. Again, prequel comic shows this. Those tattoos and shaved heads and whatnot aren't because they're miners... they used to look like perfectly normal Romulans. The tattoos and shaving came ''after'' Romulus was destroyed and set on their course, it was a ritualistic sign of their dedication to vengeance. Basically, there's a gap between Romulus getting vaped and Spock successfully stopping the supeernova cascade. Presumably any of the crew who didn't want to follow Nero on his mission of revenge just left the ship to join one of the Romulan refugee flotillas sometime between Romulus' destruction and Nero's arrival at the Vault to have the Nerada refitted.

to:

** Nero's crew is as driven and insane as he is. Again, prequel comic shows this. Those tattoos and shaved heads and whatnot aren't because they're miners... they used to look like perfectly normal Romulans. The tattoos and shaving came ''after'' Romulus was destroyed and set on their course, it was a ritualistic sign of their dedication to vengeance. Basically, there's a gap between Romulus getting vaped and Spock successfully stopping the supeernova cascade.supernova cascade that the movie doesn't really convey. Presumably any of the crew who didn't want to follow Nero on his mission of revenge just left the ship to join one of the Romulan refugee flotillas sometime between Romulus' destruction and Nero's arrival at the Vault to have the Nerada refitted.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Nero's crew is as driven and insane as he is. Again, prequel comic shows this. Those tattoos and shaved heads and whatnot aren't because they're miners... they used to look like perfectly normal Romulans. The tattoos and shaving came ''after'' Romulus was destroyed and set on their course, it was a ritualistic sign of their dedication to vengeance. Basically, there's a gap between Romulus getting vaped and Spock successfully stopping the supeernova cascade. Presumably any of the crew who didn't want to follow Nero on his mission of revenge just left the ship to join one of the Romulan refugee flotillas sometime between Romulus' destruction and Nero's arrival at the Vault to have the Nerada refitted.

Top