Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** Also, it's worth remembering that he technically never had ''all'' of Mr. Mxyzptlk's power; just 99.9% of it. So presumably since Mxyzptlk still had 0.1% there was still a connection between the two of them. Reminding Joker of just how deep a hold his obsession with Batman has over him undermined Joker's control over the 99.9% since he'd reached the limits of what he was able to do, which enabled Mxyzptlk to start draining his power back until it was all gone.
to:
** Also, it's worth remembering that he technically never had ''all'' of Mr. Mxyzptlk's power; just 99.9% of it. So presumably since Mxyzptlk still had 0.1% there was still a connection between the two of them. Reminding Joker of just how deep a hold his obsession with Batman has over him undermined Joker's control over the 99.9% since he'd reached the limits of what he was able to do, which enabled Mxyzptlk to start draining his power back until it was all gone.gone.
** It's also implied numerous times over the course of the story that the Joker's reality is in some sense [[ClapYourHandsIfYouBelieve up for grabs]]; Superman falls under Joker's control when Lois' betrayal makes him despair, the [=JLA=] resume their normal forms when Superman's heroism makes them believe in themselves, etc. Joker was in control because he believed in himself, so when Superman made him doubt, it gave Mxyzptlk the chance to snatch back his powers.
** It's also implied numerous times over the course of the story that the Joker's reality is in some sense [[ClapYourHandsIfYouBelieve up for grabs]]; Superman falls under Joker's control when Lois' betrayal makes him despair, the [=JLA=] resume their normal forms when Superman's heroism makes them believe in themselves, etc. Joker was in control because he believed in himself, so when Superman made him doubt, it gave Mxyzptlk the chance to snatch back his powers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** It seems to be a case of YourMindMakesItReal. Basically, Superman pointed out that for all of his amazing abilities, the Joker couldn't do the simplest thing of all--permanently kill a single, non-superpowered individual. No matter what he tried, no matter how many tricks he pulled, the Joker couldn't do something phenomenally easy. The realization of that weakness led the Joker to start doubting his own power, and by doubting it, he lost any ability to control it.
to:
** It seems to be a case of YourMindMakesItReal. Basically, Superman pointed out that for all of his amazing abilities, the Joker couldn't do the simplest thing of all--permanently kill a single, non-superpowered individual. No matter what he tried, no matter how many tricks he pulled, the Joker couldn't do something phenomenally easy. The realization of that weakness led the Joker to start doubting his own power, and by doubting it, he lost any ability to control it.it.
** Also, it's worth remembering that he technically never had ''all'' of Mr. Mxyzptlk's power; just 99.9% of it. So presumably since Mxyzptlk still had 0.1% there was still a connection between the two of them. Reminding Joker of just how deep a hold his obsession with Batman has over him undermined Joker's control over the 99.9% since he'd reached the limits of what he was able to do, which enabled Mxyzptlk to start draining his power back until it was all gone.
** Also, it's worth remembering that he technically never had ''all'' of Mr. Mxyzptlk's power; just 99.9% of it. So presumably since Mxyzptlk still had 0.1% there was still a connection between the two of them. Reminding Joker of just how deep a hold his obsession with Batman has over him undermined Joker's control over the 99.9% since he'd reached the limits of what he was able to do, which enabled Mxyzptlk to start draining his power back until it was all gone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* Why did Joker’s obsession over Batman and his inability to forget about him mean he lost control over the universe? The idea seems to be that if he could not do all things, then he could not do anything, but why is that the case? Why does that one limitation strip him of all his powers?
to:
* Why did Joker’s obsession over Batman and his inability to forget about him mean he lost control over the universe? The idea seems to be that if he could not do all things, then he could not do anything, but why is that the case? Why does that one limitation strip him of all his powers?powers?
** It seems to be a case of YourMindMakesItReal. Basically, Superman pointed out that for all of his amazing abilities, the Joker couldn't do the simplest thing of all--permanently kill a single, non-superpowered individual. No matter what he tried, no matter how many tricks he pulled, the Joker couldn't do something phenomenally easy. The realization of that weakness led the Joker to start doubting his own power, and by doubting it, he lost any ability to control it.
** It seems to be a case of YourMindMakesItReal. Basically, Superman pointed out that for all of his amazing abilities, the Joker couldn't do the simplest thing of all--permanently kill a single, non-superpowered individual. No matter what he tried, no matter how many tricks he pulled, the Joker couldn't do something phenomenally easy. The realization of that weakness led the Joker to start doubting his own power, and by doubting it, he lost any ability to control it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Why did Joker’s obsession over Batman and his inability to forget about him mean he lost control over the universe? The idea seems to be that if he could not do all things, then he could not do anything, but why is that the case? Why does that one limitation strip him of all his powers?
