Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* Why didn't the lawyer, Thomas Franklin, believe that he had been duped? In his head, how exactly was he duped? He witnessed a simpleton with no ID at the estate, so he kicked him off the property. How would any of this bite him back and ruin his political ambitions?
to:
* Why didn't did the lawyer, Thomas Franklin, believe that he had been duped? In his head, how exactly was he duped? He witnessed a simpleton with no ID at the estate, so he kicked him off the property. How would any of this bite him back and ruin his political ambitions?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Why didn't the lawyer, Thomas Franklin, believe that he had been duped? In his head, how exactly was he duped? He witnessed a simpleton with no ID at the estate, so he kicked him off the property. How would any of this bite him back and ruin his political ambitions?
* I know the plot wouldn't work otherwise, but why didn't the Rands even ask Chance for his insurance or anything about his home address?
* Was there meant to be more to the Thomas/Susan storyline? It appeared that the conversation about whether those two were a thing or suspected of being a thing was cut off midsentence.
* I know the plot wouldn't work otherwise, but why didn't the Rands even ask Chance for his insurance or anything about his home address?
* Was there meant to be more to the Thomas/Susan storyline? It appeared that the conversation about whether those two were a thing or suspected of being a thing was cut off midsentence.
