Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / Bakuman

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***On the subject of her being his reward for success: if it were just that, it probably would be sexist. But everyone seems to be forgetting that this isn't one-sided at all. ''He'' is also ''her'' reward for her success - the 'rule' for them getting married isn't just them getting an anime, it also relies on her being a prominent voice actor, good enough to get the main role in the anime. Come to think of it, even if the anime was the only condition for marriage, it could easily be seen as sexist in the opposite direction - ''he only deserves to be with her if he can make an anime-worthy manga''. If he can't do that, then he's not worthy of her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** That's a problem inside japanese fandom. May not make any sense, but it's real.

to:

** That's a problem inside japanese fandom. May not make any sense, but it's real.real.
** It's worth pointing out that Mashiro and Azuki are, despite their humble beginnings, essentially Japanese celebrities, being half of a best-selling mangaka duo, and a voice actress who could reasonably expect to land a main heroine role, respectively. It's natural that they'd attract a fair amount of attention and controversy over their relationship. Miura once says "Voice acting is a job that sells dreams[[hottip:note:I wonder if he means people fantasizing about getting together with their favorite idols, or imagining them as someone who wouldn't settle down with someone]], so I can understand the fans being annoyed, but..." Additionally, with the exception of the anonymous posters and Miho's manager (who has virtually no respect for her individual wishes, as seen in the gravure photo album incident back when Mashiro first got serialized), ''everyone'' thinks that Mashiro and Azuki haven't done anything wrong, which could underscore how unreasonable the backlash is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** That's a problem inside japanese fandom. May not make any sense, but it's real.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Yet the anime didn't seem to have any problem mentioning the magazine's popular titles like One Piece, Bleach and Dragon Ball.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Speaking of the issues that involve Azuki serving mostly as a goal for Mashiro with his manga work, isn't his whole goal with her with the "we won't be together until we make a hit manga" plan kind of ridiculous considering he could have just as easily screwed it up just like his dead uncle with the amount of time it took for both to make a hit manga?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* So what the hell was the problem with Azuki having a boyfriend in the first place. That's the one thing that confused the hell out of me, the part where an internet guy figures out that a popular voice actress has a boyfriend. Some fat nerd puts 2 and 2 together and for some reason the whole world wants to kill poor Azuki now? I really don't get it. It starts in chapter 168 by the way.

to:

* So what the hell was the problem with Azuki having a boyfriend in the first place. That's the one thing that confused the hell out of me, me; the part where an internet guy figures out that a popular voice actress has a boyfriend. boyfriend, and for some reason this causes a problem. Huh? Some fat nerd puts 2 and 2 together and for some reason the whole world wants to kill poor Azuki now? Voice actresses never have boyfriends any more? I really don't get it. It starts in chapter 168 by the way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* So what the hell was the problem with Azuki having a boyfriend in the first place. That's the one thing that confused the hell out of me, the part where an internet guy figures out that a popular voice actress has a boyfriend. Some fat nerd puts 2 and 2 together and for some reason the whole world wants to kill poor Azuki now? I really don't get it.

to:

* So what the hell was the problem with Azuki having a boyfriend in the first place. That's the one thing that confused the hell out of me, the part where an internet guy figures out that a popular voice actress has a boyfriend. Some fat nerd puts 2 and 2 together and for some reason the whole world wants to kill poor Azuki now? I really don't get it. It starts in chapter 168 by the way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* So what the hell was the problem with Azuki having a boyfriend in the first place. That's the one thing that confused the hell out of me, the part where an internet guy figures out that a popular voice actress has a boyfriend. Some fat nerd puts 2 and 2 together and for some reason the whole world wants to kill poor Azuki now? I really don't get it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** Bleach isn't sexist? Most of the time the female characters are never able to stand their ground in a fight without a last minute save by a guy. And lets not even get into the overabundance of insane breast sizes....

to:

**** Bleach isn't sexist? Most of the time the female characters are never able to stand their ground in a fight without a last minute save by a guy. And lets not even get into the overabundance of insane breast sizes....sizes. Than there's Naruto, with their pile of useless female characters who's character and personality are pretty much just summed up by their crush or interest in a boy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** Bleach isn't sexist? Most of the time the female characters are never able to stand their ground in a fight without a last minute save by a guy. And lets not even get into the overabundance of insane breast sizes....

Added: 271

Changed: 3

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ItJustBugsMe that anyone period can say they read this manga and say Shujin doesn't loves Miyoshi. Seriously? SERIOUSLY? And why would the author break up a couple that's been well-established since the beginning of the freaking manga? [[YourHeadAsplode Just...just...]]

to:

* ItJustBugsMe It Just Bugs Me that anyone period can say they read this manga and say Shujin doesn't loves Miyoshi. Seriously? SERIOUSLY? And why would the author break up a couple that's been well-established since the beginning of the freaking manga? [[YourHeadAsplode Just...just...]]


Added DiffLines:

*** FanPreferredCouple is fairly common, especially in cases when people think [[StrangledByTheRedString the canon couple was forced]] over a much better alternative, but one has to wonder whether the desired romance would go as well as they had hoped if it became canon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
YMMV sinkhole


** Furthermore. That one line Saiko's father says actually explains and makes sense when you think of it in the context of a common trope, how WomenAreWiser. "Men have Dreams that Women can't understand." Think about it in the context of that trope, in that women are typically wiser and more knowledgeable than men. The line means in that context that women, with more common wisdom to them (like why being a manga-ka is a painfully bad idea from a logical standpoint) therefore actually go against dreams because of that wisdom, being by that logic unable to understand why a man would seek out a goal that makes no sense. Men, by the same logic of having less wisdom, are in turn perceived as being able to dream bigger than women, unrestrained by common wisdom of what is "the smart thing" to do. The men will, by this logic, have seemingly insane dreams the wiser women can't understand. So there you have it, a {{YMMV}} explanation of how that one line is actually a subtle case of PositiveDiscrimination for ''both'' genders; women are wise, but therefore are much more grounded in their realities, while men are less wise and therefore much more free to dream big and accept the consequences.

to:

** Furthermore. That one line Saiko's father says actually explains and makes sense when you think of it in the context of a common trope, how WomenAreWiser. "Men have Dreams that Women can't understand." Think about it in the context of that trope, in that women are typically wiser and more knowledgeable than men. The line means in that context that women, with more common wisdom to them (like why being a manga-ka is a painfully bad idea from a logical standpoint) therefore actually go against dreams because of that wisdom, being by that logic unable to understand why a man would seek out a goal that makes no sense. Men, by the same logic of having less wisdom, are in turn perceived as being able to dream bigger than women, unrestrained by common wisdom of what is "the smart thing" to do. The men will, by this logic, have seemingly insane dreams the wiser women can't understand. So there you have it, a {{YMMV}} an explanation of how that one line is actually a subtle case of PositiveDiscrimination for ''both'' genders; women are wise, but therefore are much more grounded in their realities, while men are less wise and therefore much more free to dream big and accept the consequences.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Simply put, Nakai was allowed redemption by Hiramaru's offer for a few different reasons. One being that they were both drunk/punch drunk, and not entirely all there. Second, Hiramaru was considering Nakai to be NotSoDifferent to what he himself could become, and felt like giving the guy a hand. Third, and this is what really matters, Nakai held himself back from hitting his MoralEventHorizon. With Aoki right there for him to assault/whatever the hell else he could think of, he basically had the woman he hated in his hands... But stopped himself. By holding himself back from attacking her, he stopped himself from jumping any farther down [[JumpingOffTheSlipperySlope the Slippery Slope,]] and Hiramaru took this opportunity to give Nakai a hand in moving on. This stops Nakai from having a grudge against Aoki and frees her from any feelings of guilt, Hiramaru gets to look semi-badass in front of the woman he likes, and Nakai himself gets another shot at life as a mangaka, and this time without having Nanamine's influence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** That makes sense.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** That and Gintama never says ''Weekly Shonen Jump'' or ''Shonen Jump'', they just say ''Jump'', definitely keeping the Trademark away from being used.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Ok, this is just me adding to the whole "Bakuman is sexist" discussion and asking...Why? Bakuman is NOT sexist. First off, the whole bit about "men have dreams women don't understand" is pretty easy to get. It's basically just another way of saying "it's a boy thing" or "you just don't understand a man's romance" or "men have their own way of doing things". THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT. Also, I took the reason people don't have a good impression of Iwase at first was because she seemed pretentious and dismissive of manga and that her reasons for doing what she did was simply because of her rather one-sided rivalry with Takagi.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Ok, this is just me adding to the whole "Bakuman is sexist" discussion and saying...Why? Bakuman is NOT sexist. First off, the whole bit about "men have dreams women don't understand" is pretty easy to get. It's basically just another way of saying "it's a boy thing" or "you just don't understand a man's romance" or "men have their own way of doing things". THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT. Also, I took the reason people don't have a good impression of Iwase at first was because she seemed pretentious and dismissive of manga and that her reasons for doing what she did was simply because of her rather one-sided rivalry with Takagi.

to:

* Ok, this is just me adding to the whole "Bakuman is sexist" discussion and saying...asking...Why? Bakuman is NOT sexist. First off, the whole bit about "men have dreams women don't understand" is pretty easy to get. It's basically just another way of saying "it's a boy thing" or "you just don't understand a man's romance" or "men have their own way of doing things". THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT. Also, I took the reason people don't have a good impression of Iwase at first was because she seemed pretentious and dismissive of manga and that her reasons for doing what she did was simply because of her rather one-sided rivalry with Takagi.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*Ok, this is just me adding to the whole "Bakuman is sexist" discussion and saying...Why? Bakuman is NOT sexist. First off, the whole bit about "men have dreams women don't understand" is pretty easy to get. It's basically just another way of saying "it's a boy thing" or "you just don't understand a man's romance" or "men have their own way of doing things". THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT. Also, I took the reason people don't have a good impression of Iwase at first was because she seemed pretentious and dismissive of manga and that her reasons for doing what she did was simply because of her rather one-sided rivalry with Takagi.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* How are the producers of the anime going to convert over 100 chapters worth of material into a 25-episode anime? DeathNote had 37 episodes for 108 chapters, making a roughly 1:3 episode-chapter ratio, and even then, the producers cut out a fair amount from the last part, including the last two chapters. Considering that Bakuman probably will have at least as many chapters as Death Note by the time it ends, making it at least 1:4 (if not closer to 1:5), I can only see the producers removing even more (perhaps the entire Tanto arc?), or significantly changing the plot.

to:

* How are the producers of the anime going to convert over 100 chapters worth of material into a 25-episode anime? DeathNote Manga/DeathNote had 37 episodes for 108 chapters, making a roughly 1:3 episode-chapter ratio, and even then, the producers cut out a fair amount from the last part, including the last two chapters. Considering that Bakuman probably will have at least as many chapters as Death Note by the time it ends, making it at least 1:4 (if not closer to 1:5), I can only see the producers removing even more (perhaps the entire Tanto arc?), or significantly changing the plot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Copyright issues.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Furthermore. That one line Saiko's father says actually explains and makes sense when you think of it in the context of a common trope, how women are CloserToEarth. "Men have Dreams that Women can't understand." Think about it in the context of that trope, in that women are typically wiser and more knowledgeable than men. The line means in that context that women, with more common wisdom to them (like why being a manga-ka is a painfully bad idea from a logical standpoint) therefore actually go against dreams because of that wisdom, being by that logic unable to understand why a man would seek out a goal that makes no sense. Men, by the same logic of having less wisdom, are in turn perceived as being able to dream bigger than women, unrestrained by common wisdom of what is "the smart thing" to do. The men will, by this logic, have seemingly insane dreams the wiser women can't understand. So there you have it, a {{YMMV}} explanation of how that one line is actually a subtle case of PositiveDiscrimination for ''both'' genders; women are wise, but therefore are much more grounded in their realities, while men are less wise and therefore much more free to dream big and accept the consequences.

to:

** Furthermore. That one line Saiko's father says actually explains and makes sense when you think of it in the context of a common trope, how women are CloserToEarth.WomenAreWiser. "Men have Dreams that Women can't understand." Think about it in the context of that trope, in that women are typically wiser and more knowledgeable than men. The line means in that context that women, with more common wisdom to them (like why being a manga-ka is a painfully bad idea from a logical standpoint) therefore actually go against dreams because of that wisdom, being by that logic unable to understand why a man would seek out a goal that makes no sense. Men, by the same logic of having less wisdom, are in turn perceived as being able to dream bigger than women, unrestrained by common wisdom of what is "the smart thing" to do. The men will, by this logic, have seemingly insane dreams the wiser women can't understand. So there you have it, a {{YMMV}} explanation of how that one line is actually a subtle case of PositiveDiscrimination for ''both'' genders; women are wise, but therefore are much more grounded in their realities, while men are less wise and therefore much more free to dream big and accept the consequences.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*In the anime, why is Shounen Jump called Shounen Jack? I would understand if they were talking about another magazine (say, Sunday or Magazine) but why do they have to change it when Bakuman serialized in Jump? Manga/{{Gintama}} has no problems saying "Jump" all the time...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Furthermore. That one line Saiko's father says actually explains and makes sense when you think of it in the context of a common trope, how women are CloserToEarth. "Men have Dreams that Women can't understand." Think about it in the context of that trope, in that women are typically wiser and more knowledgeable than men. The line means in that context that women, with more common wisdom to them (like why being a manga-ka is a painfully bad idea from a logical standpoint) therefore actually go against dreams because of that wisdom, being by that logic unable to understand why a man would seek out a goal that makes no sense. Men, by the same logic of having less wisdom, are in turn perceived as being able to dream bigger than women, unrestrained by common wisdom of what is "the smart thing" to do. The men will, by this logic, have seemingly insane dreams the wiser women can't understand. So there you have it, a {{YMMV}} explanation of how that one line is actually a subtle case of PositiveDiscrimination for ''both'' genders; women are wise, but therefore are much more grounded in their realities, while men are less wise and therefore much more free to dream big and accept the consequences.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** I believe that if it were to occur, that would mean that Bakuman is close to an end.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***Although Ohba doesn't have a very good track record of powerful female figures, it might not mean he/she can't write one. The sexism is hard to ignore, but my optimistic theory is that since Death Note and Bakuman are set in modern-day Japan, the sexism is supposed to represent Japan's sexism. It is possible that Ohba/Obata may not agree with the general view of women, but are merely representing the views of Japanese society; my two cents.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** I always thought it was the latter, that while she loved her soon-to-be husband, she still had some underlying feelings for Nobuhiro and felt that could complicate things later.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The two are writing for a ''boys'' magazine, so it makes sense to focus more on the male demographic and consider that the writers of fan letters may not be the best source of advice (additionally, the main characters were mainly focused on keeping their manga in the magazine instead of doing what makes sense for the story). I wonder how things would have gone if they'd chosen to
*** Uh, Tite Kubo writes for a boy's magazine. So does Masashi Kishimoto, and niether have such blatant sexism. Go read Shounen Jump and bring back a story that is more sexist than Bakuman...(or Death Note, or Hikaru No Go....)

to:

*** The two are writing for a ''boys'' magazine, so it makes sense to focus more on the male demographic and consider that the writers of fan letters may not be the best source of advice (additionally, the main characters were mainly focused on keeping their manga in the magazine instead of doing what makes sense for the story). I wonder how things would have gone if they'd chosen to\n
*** Uh, Tite Kubo writes for a boy's magazine. So does Masashi Kishimoto, and niether neither have such blatant sexism. Go read Shounen Jump and bring back a story that is more sexist than Bakuman...(or Death Note, or Hikaru No Go....)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Couldn't the whole anime thing get resolved if they got an OVA? It's technically an anime, though I have no idea how the making-an-OVA process would go, or if the same sponsor thing would arise.

Added: 1049

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Miura also points out, during his explanation of why fan letters don't work, is that even the girls are reading Jump for Shonen manga, and Mashiro and Takagi need to offer manga that fits the genre. Aoki gradually adjusts her stories so that they fit better with Shonen Jump; while Hideout Door gets canceled fairly quickly because it isn't very shonen and Time of Green Leaves is mainly a romance with fanservice, The Gift God Gave me is said to be significantly more shonen. Combining this with the fact that not all of Takagi's stories, as well as Nanamine's "Classroom of Truth" are the kind of stories that would do well in Jump, and it's mainly a matter of balancing what a writer can or wants to write and what will be popular or suited to the magazine.



* Also, why did Aoki offer herself up to Nakai? If she was the one who wronged him, kudos to her, but hell, SHE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING WRONG.

to:

* Also, why did Aoki offer herself up to Nakai? If she was the one who wronged him, kudos to her, but hell, SHE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING WRONG. WRONG.
** She had a similar attitude in Chapter 70 ("I feel like it's my fault he's leaving"), possibly because her refusal to associate with him any longer led to him going back home, and while none of her actions were ''wrong'', her rejection of him indirectly led to Nakai's present state.

Added: 227

Changed: 34

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Uh, Tite Kubo writes for a boy's magazine. So does Masashi Kishimoto, and niether have such blatant sexism. Go read Shounen Jump and bring back a story that is more sexist than Bakuman...(or Death Note, or Hikaru No Go....)



** Now that you mention it, it seemed weird to me at first. But first of all, they get more detailed in Perfect Crime Club. Secondly: after all, the things you mention that they usually discuss ''are'' the things that matter when somebody's choosing a manga to read. Or to put it differently, when you're looking for a fun manga, what matters most is whether or not it's the genre of manga you like (like an action-filled shonen, a tear-jerker of a shojo, or a violent seinen), not whether or not Character 1 is going to turn against Character 2. Precise details usually don't matter ''that'' much; either people like what happens and keep reading, or they're dissatisfied with how something has turned out (like some character getting unfairly accused) and keep reading hoping that things'll turn out okay, eagerly staying as loyal readers until they get some assurance that things'll be fine. The readers who scream "Oh noooo!" when reading Naruto are the ones who turn the pages the quickest, being the most eager to find out what happens next. The reason somebody likes a manga is because of its genre, its art and its style of writing - not particular plot points. And while I'm at it - they do discuss the characters fairly often, especially in Tanto.

to:

** Now that you mention it, it seemed weird to me at first. But first of all, they get more detailed in Perfect Crime Club. Secondly: after all, the things ainst Character 2things you mention that they usually discuss ''are'' the things that matter when somebody's choosing a manga to read. Or to put it differently, when you're looking for a fun manga, what matters most is whether or not it's the genre of manga you like (like an action-filled shonen, a tear-jerker of a shojo, or a violent seinen), not whether or not Character 1 is going to turn against Character 2.ag. Precise details usually don't matter ''that'' much; either people like what happens and keep reading, or they're dissatisfied with how something has turned out (like some character getting unfairly accused) and keep reading hoping that things'll turn out okay, eagerly staying as loyal readers until they get some assurance that things'll be fine. The readers who scream "Oh noooo!" when reading Naruto are the ones who turn the pages the quickest, being the most eager to find out what happens next. The reason somebody likes a manga is because of its genre, its art and its style of writing - not particular plot points. And while I'm at it - they do discuss the characters fairly often, especially in Tanto.

Top