Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 44 (click to see context) from:
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online Website/YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[ControlFreak their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to [[HolierThanThou demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up]], treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]] What especially stands out about the latter aspect is that he makes the distinction between calling out elements of media that could be genuinely harmful but still allowing for discussion and debate, versus the type of arguments and mentality where mindless negativity is used to prop up the [[KnowNothingKnowItAll illusion of their own intelligence and insight without actually saying anything meaningful]], or worse to shut down all debate and criticism entirely to protect their own ego.
to:
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online Website/YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[ControlFreak [[HolierThanThou their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to [[HolierThanThou demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up]], up, treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]] What especially stands out about the latter aspect is that he makes the distinction between calling out elements of media that could be genuinely harmful but still allowing for discussion and debate, versus the type of arguments and mentality where mindless negativity is used to prop up the [[KnowNothingKnowItAll illusion of their own intelligence and insight without actually saying anything meaningful]], or worse to shut down all debate and criticism entirely to protect their own ego.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 44 (click to see context) from:
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online Website/YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[ControlFreak their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to [[HolierThanThou demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up]], treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]] What especially stands out about the latter aspect is that he makes the distinction between calling out elements of media that could be genuinely harmful but still allowing for discussion and debate, versus the type of arguments and mentality, where mindless negativity is used to prop up the [[KnowNothingKnowItAll illusion of their own intelligence and insight without actually saying anything meaningful]], or worse to shut down all debate and criticism entirely to protect their own ego.
to:
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online Website/YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[ControlFreak their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to [[HolierThanThou demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up]], treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]] What especially stands out about the latter aspect is that he makes the distinction between calling out elements of media that could be genuinely harmful but still allowing for discussion and debate, versus the type of arguments and mentality, mentality where mindless negativity is used to prop up the [[KnowNothingKnowItAll illusion of their own intelligence and insight without actually saying anything meaningful]], or worse to shut down all debate and criticism entirely to protect their own ego.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 44 (click to see context) from:
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online Website/YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[HolierThanThou their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up, treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]] What especially stands out about the latter aspect is that he makes the distinction between calling out elements of media that could be genuinely harmful but still allowing for discussion and debate, versus the type of arguments and mentality, where mindless negativity is used to prop up the [[KnowNothingKnowItAll illusion of their own intelligence and insight without actually saying anything meaningful]], or worse to shut down all debate and criticism entirely to protect their own ego.
to:
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online Website/YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[HolierThanThou [[ControlFreak their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to [[HolierThanThou demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up, up]], treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]] What especially stands out about the latter aspect is that he makes the distinction between calling out elements of media that could be genuinely harmful but still allowing for discussion and debate, versus the type of arguments and mentality, where mindless negativity is used to prop up the [[KnowNothingKnowItAll illusion of their own intelligence and insight without actually saying anything meaningful]], or worse to shut down all debate and criticism entirely to protect their own ego.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 44 (click to see context) from:
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online Website/YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[HolierThanThou their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up, treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]] What especially stands out about the latter aspect is that he makes the distinction between calling out elements of media that could be genuinely harmful but still allowing for discussion and debate, versus the type of arguments and mentality used to prop up the [[KnowNothingKnowItAll illusion of their own intelligence and insight without actually saying anything meaningful]], or worse to shut down all debate and criticism entirely to protect their own ego.
to:
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online Website/YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[HolierThanThou their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up, treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]] What especially stands out about the latter aspect is that he makes the distinction between calling out elements of media that could be genuinely harmful but still allowing for discussion and debate, versus the type of arguments and mentality mentality, where mindless negativity is used to prop up the [[KnowNothingKnowItAll illusion of their own intelligence and insight without actually saying anything meaningful]], or worse to shut down all debate and criticism entirely to protect their own ego.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 44 (click to see context) from:
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online Website/YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[HolierThanThou their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up, treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]] What especially stands out about the latter aspect is that he makes the distinction between calling out elements of media that could be genuinely harmful but still allowing for discussion and debate, versus the type of arguments and mentality used to prop up the [[KnowNothingKnowItAll illusion of their own intelligence and insight without actually saying anything meaningful]], or worse to shut down all debate and criticism.
to:
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online Website/YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[HolierThanThou their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up, treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]] What especially stands out about the latter aspect is that he makes the distinction between calling out elements of media that could be genuinely harmful but still allowing for discussion and debate, versus the type of arguments and mentality used to prop up the [[KnowNothingKnowItAll illusion of their own intelligence and insight without actually saying anything meaningful]], or worse to shut down all debate and criticism.criticism entirely to protect their own ego.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 44 (click to see context) from:
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online Website/YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[HolierThanThou their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up, treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]] What especially stands out about the latter aspect is that he makes the distinction between calling out elements of media that could be genuinely harmful but still allowing for discussion and debate, versus the type of arguments and mentality used to shut down all debate and criticism from those who might disagree or hold a different viewpoint.
to:
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online Website/YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[HolierThanThou their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up, treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]] What especially stands out about the latter aspect is that he makes the distinction between calling out elements of media that could be genuinely harmful but still allowing for discussion and debate, versus the type of arguments and mentality used to prop up the [[KnowNothingKnowItAll illusion of their own intelligence and insight without actually saying anything meaningful]], or worse to shut down all debate and criticism from those who might disagree or hold a different viewpoint.criticism.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 44 (click to see context) from:
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online Website/YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[HolierThanThou their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up, treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]]
to:
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online Website/YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[HolierThanThou their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up, treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]]]] What especially stands out about the latter aspect is that he makes the distinction between calling out elements of media that could be genuinely harmful but still allowing for discussion and debate, versus the type of arguments and mentality used to shut down all debate and criticism from those who might disagree or hold a different viewpoint.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 44 (click to see context) from:
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[HolierThanThou their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up, treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]]
to:
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online YouTube Website/YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[HolierThanThou their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up, treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 43 (click to see context) from:
* In "After the Fact: Magical Ethics," Silver makes a perfect argument in favor of the Death Sticks scene in ''Film/StarWarsEpisodeIIAttackOfTheClones'', that being that Obi-Wan told the drug dealer (Elan Sleazebaggano/Sel'Sabagno) to "rethink your life", not "become a different person". Obi-Wan put Elan on the path to become a better person, but didn't make any choice for him. In the expanded universe, which Silver references in the video, Elan did rethink his life and later helped other people like him to kick the habit.
to:
* In "After the Fact: Magical Ethics," Silver makes a perfect argument in favor of the Death Sticks scene in ''Film/StarWarsEpisodeIIAttackOfTheClones'', that being that Obi-Wan told the drug dealer (Elan Sleazebaggano/Sel'Sabagno) to "rethink your life", not "become a different person". Obi-Wan put Elan on the path to become a better person, but didn't make any choice for him. In the expanded universe, which Silver references in the video, Elan did rethink his life and later helped other people like him to kick the habit.habit.
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[HolierThanThou their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up, treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]]
* The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Er_VRIfw4 Fluttershy Micro Supplement Video]] has Silver Quill provide an excellent analysis as to what makes a genuinely good critic or analyst, by highlighting how they make the effort to constructively understand the intent and execution of a work while offering ways to improve. By contrast, he uses the darker side of online YouTube criticism and the character Praiser Pan as an example of what is an extremely flawed or downright bad way of analysis, where the "critic" is more interested in using [[HolierThanThou their status to attempt to dictate what they believe is correct]], or to demean or attack the work and creator to prop their own status up, treating media as little more than a [[GloryHound stepping stone for their own fame and glory.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* In "After The Fact: Pinkie Apple Pie" Silver Quill takes out [[spoiler:''[[https://youtu.be/pRMl44KoRPY?t=5m30s Slendermane!]]'' With an OffhandBackhand no less!]]
to:
* In "After The Fact: Pinkie Apple Pie" Silver Quill takes out [[spoiler:''[[https://youtu.''[[https://youtu.be/pRMl44KoRPY?t=5m30s Slendermane!]]'' With an OffhandBackhand no less!]]less!
Changed line(s) 28 (click to see context) from:
* In "After the Fact: Do Princesses Dream of Magic Sheep?" Silver eventually gets tired of being repeatedly stomped into the ground [[spoiler: by a giant Tantabus]] and lifts the thing's hoof of himself from pure outrage.
to:
* In "After the Fact: Do Princesses Dream of Magic Sheep?" Silver eventually gets tired of being repeatedly stomped into the ground [[spoiler: by a giant Tantabus]] Tantabus and lifts the thing's hoof of himself from pure outrage.
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
* "After The Fact: Scare Master" has Baron Tall Tales giving Silver Quill a ReasonYouSuckSpeech then offering him a SadisticChoice: [[WeCanRuleTogether join him in causing trouble for others]] or [[OffWithHisHead be killed by a guillotine]]. Silver's answer is a LittleNo, which seals his fate. Except not really as a somehow still living Silver takes his head back, reattaches it, and delivers a ShutUpHannibal speech to Tall Tales over how he may have been closer to the mark than he realized but Silver is content with the idea [[WhatYouAreInTheDark that his videos may just reach out to someone, regardless of all his antics]].
to:
* "After The Fact: Scare Master" has Baron Tall Tales giving Silver Quill a ReasonYouSuckSpeech then offering him a SadisticChoice: SuicidalSadisticChoice: [[WeCanRuleTogether join him in causing trouble for others]] or [[OffWithHisHead be killed by a guillotine]]. Silver's answer is a LittleNo, which seals his fate. Except not really as a somehow still living Silver takes his head back, reattaches it, and delivers a ShutUpHannibal speech to Tall Tales over how he may have been closer to the mark than he realized but Silver is content with the idea [[WhatYouAreInTheDark that his videos may just reach out to someone, regardless of all his antics]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 42 (click to see context) from:
* In his review of "The Inhumanoids", he shows off his surprisingly strong character by saying two of the things that turn him off as an adult are the casual racism and the blatant sexism; he also teaches AnAesop that discovering you are bothered by problematic elements in something you enjoy/enjoyed is a sign of strong character and]] [[CharacterDevelopment personal growth]] and that once you've realized this, it's an opportunity to compare the problematic elements with the positive ones to see if the latter outweigh the former.
to:
* In his review of "The Inhumanoids", he shows off his surprisingly strong character by saying two of the things that turn him off as an adult are the casual racism and the blatant sexism; he also teaches AnAesop that discovering you are bothered by problematic elements in something you enjoy/enjoyed is a sign of strong character and]] and [[CharacterDevelopment personal growth]] and that once you've realized this, it's an opportunity to compare the problematic elements with the positive ones to see if the latter outweigh the former.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 42 (click to see context) from:
* In his review of "The Inhumanoids", he shows off his surprisingly strong character by saying two of the things that turn him off as an adult are the casual racism and the blatant sexism; he also [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped drops the anvil that discovering you are bothered by problematic elements in something you enjoy/enjoyed is a sign of strong character and]] [[CharacterDevelopment personal growth]] [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped and that once you've realized this, it's an opportunity to compare the problematic elements with the positive ones to see if the latter outweigh the former]].
to:
* In his review of "The Inhumanoids", he shows off his surprisingly strong character by saying two of the things that turn him off as an adult are the casual racism and the blatant sexism; he also [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped drops the anvil teaches AnAesop that discovering you are bothered by problematic elements in something you enjoy/enjoyed is a sign of strong character and]] [[CharacterDevelopment personal growth]] [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped and that once you've realized this, it's an opportunity to compare the problematic elements with the positive ones to see if the latter outweigh the former]].former.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 42 (click to see context) from:
* In his review of "The Inhumanoids", he shows off his surprisingly strong character by saying two of the things that turn him off as an adult are the casual racism and the blatant sexism; he also [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped drops the anvil that discovering you are bothered by problematic elements in something you enjoy/enjoyed is a sign of strong character and]] [[CharacterDevelopment personal growth]] [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped and that once you've realized this, it's an opportunity to compare the problematic elements with the positive ones to see if the latter outweigh the former]].
to:
* In his review of "The Inhumanoids", he shows off his surprisingly strong character by saying two of the things that turn him off as an adult are the casual racism and the blatant sexism; he also [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped drops the anvil that discovering you are bothered by problematic elements in something you enjoy/enjoyed is a sign of strong character and]] [[CharacterDevelopment personal growth]] [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped and that once you've realized this, it's an opportunity to compare the problematic elements with the positive ones to see if the latter outweigh the former]].former]].
* In "After the Fact: Magical Ethics," Silver makes a perfect argument in favor of the Death Sticks scene in ''Film/StarWarsEpisodeIIAttackOfTheClones'', that being that Obi-Wan told the drug dealer (Elan Sleazebaggano/Sel'Sabagno) to "rethink your life", not "become a different person". Obi-Wan put Elan on the path to become a better person, but didn't make any choice for him. In the expanded universe, which Silver references in the video, Elan did rethink his life and later helped other people like him to kick the habit.
* In "After the Fact: Magical Ethics," Silver makes a perfect argument in favor of the Death Sticks scene in ''Film/StarWarsEpisodeIIAttackOfTheClones'', that being that Obi-Wan told the drug dealer (Elan Sleazebaggano/Sel'Sabagno) to "rethink your life", not "become a different person". Obi-Wan put Elan on the path to become a better person, but didn't make any choice for him. In the expanded universe, which Silver references in the video, Elan did rethink his life and later helped other people like him to kick the habit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 30 (click to see context) from:
* In his "Radiant Rarity" video, he warmly praises Rarity as a character for being able to be both traditionally feminine and a strong person, saying that having strong female characters demonstrate this strength by declaring the elements of traditional femininity worthless is self-defeating and insulting.
to:
* In his "Radiant Rarity" video, he warmly praises Rarity as a character for being able to be both traditionally feminine and a strong person, saying that having strong female characters demonstrate this strength by declaring the elements of traditional femininity worthless is self-defeating and insulting.insulting, a view he reinforces in "Rah Rah Rainbow" in which he praises how Rainbow is allowed to be both a big tomboy and able to interact with and appreciate more feminine peers.
Changed line(s) 42 (click to see context) from:
* In his review of "The Inhumanoids", he shows off his surprisingly strong character by saying two of the things that turn him off as an adult are the casual racism and the blatant sexism; he also [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped drops the anvil that discovering you are bothered by problematic elements in something you enjoy/enjoyed is a sign of strong character and]] CharacterDevelopment [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped and that once you've realized this, it's an opportunity to compare the problematic elements with the positive ones to see if the latter outweigh the former]].
to:
* In his review of "The Inhumanoids", he shows off his surprisingly strong character by saying two of the things that turn him off as an adult are the casual racism and the blatant sexism; he also [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped drops the anvil that discovering you are bothered by problematic elements in something you enjoy/enjoyed is a sign of strong character and]] CharacterDevelopment [[CharacterDevelopment personal growth]] [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped and that once you've realized this, it's an opportunity to compare the problematic elements with the positive ones to see if the latter outweigh the former]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* In his "Radiant Rarity" video, he warmly praises Rarity as a character for being able to be both traditionally feminine and a strong person, saying that having strong female characters demonstrate this strength by declaring the elements of traditional femininity worthless is self-defeating and insulting.
Changed line(s) 40 (click to see context) from:
* "After The Fact: The Beginning of the End" has Silver going after Sombra with a gun twice! The first time was Sombra's fear spell not working how he expected while the second was just payback for targeting Fluttershy.
to:
* "After The Fact: The Beginning of the End" has Silver going after Sombra with a gun twice! The first time was Sombra's fear spell not working how he expected while the second was just payback for targeting Fluttershy.Fluttershy.
* In his review of "The Inhumanoids", he shows off his surprisingly strong character by saying two of the things that turn him off as an adult are the casual racism and the blatant sexism; he also [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped drops the anvil that discovering you are bothered by problematic elements in something you enjoy/enjoyed is a sign of strong character and]] CharacterDevelopment [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped and that once you've realized this, it's an opportunity to compare the problematic elements with the positive ones to see if the latter outweigh the former]].
* In his review of "The Inhumanoids", he shows off his surprisingly strong character by saying two of the things that turn him off as an adult are the casual racism and the blatant sexism; he also [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped drops the anvil that discovering you are bothered by problematic elements in something you enjoy/enjoyed is a sign of strong character and]] CharacterDevelopment [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped and that once you've realized this, it's an opportunity to compare the problematic elements with the positive ones to see if the latter outweigh the former]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 39 (click to see context) from:
* Silver pointing out [[HeartIsAnAwesomePower how useful and powerful Fluttershy's ability to speak with animals really is]].
to:
* Silver pointing out [[HeartIsAnAwesomePower how useful and powerful Fluttershy's ability to speak with animals really is]].
* "After The Fact: The Beginning of the End" has Silver going after Sombra with a gun twice! The first time was Sombra's fear spell not working how he expected while the second was just payback for targeting Fluttershy.
* "After The Fact: The Beginning of the End" has Silver going after Sombra with a gun twice! The first time was Sombra's fear spell not working how he expected while the second was just payback for targeting Fluttershy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27,28 (click to see context) from:
* "Loveable Luna" has Silver offering Luna a free shot at him for whatever he winds up doing to her in his next review. How does she respond when he invites and even dares her to take her best shot? Give him a kiss on the cheek. Admit it that is one thing Silver and the audience would never see coming.
* In "After the Fact: Do Princesses Dream of Magic Sheep?" Silver eventually gets tired of being repeatedly stomped into the ground [[spoiler: by a giant Tantabus]] and lifts the things hoof of himself from pure outrage.
* In "After the Fact: Do Princesses Dream of Magic Sheep?" Silver eventually gets tired of being repeatedly stomped into the ground [[spoiler: by a giant Tantabus]] and lifts the things hoof of himself from pure outrage.
to:
* "Loveable "Lovable Luna" has Silver offering Luna a free shot at him for whatever he winds up doing to her in his next review. How does she respond when he invites and even dares her to take her best shot? Give him a kiss on the cheek. Admit it that is one thing Silver and the audience would never see coming.
* In "After the Fact: Do Princesses Dream of Magic Sheep?" Silver eventually gets tired of being repeatedly stomped into the ground [[spoiler: by a giant Tantabus]] and lifts thethings thing's hoof of himself from pure outrage.
* In "After the Fact: Do Princesses Dream of Magic Sheep?" Silver eventually gets tired of being repeatedly stomped into the ground [[spoiler: by a giant Tantabus]] and lifts the
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 38 (click to see context) from:
* Silver's ReasonYouSuckSpeech to Misty Fly for her KickTheDog moment in "After The Fact: Newbie Crash".
to:
* Silver's ReasonYouSuckSpeech to Misty Fly for her KickTheDog moment in "After The Fact: Newbie Crash".Crash".
* Silver pointing out [[HeartIsAnAwesomePower how useful and powerful Fluttershy's ability to speak with animals really is]].
* Silver pointing out [[HeartIsAnAwesomePower how useful and powerful Fluttershy's ability to speak with animals really is]].
