This is discussion archived from a time before the current discussion method was installed.
I would like to petition that we do not remove any of the arguements or Apocalypse How type descriptions of space weaponry as long as the discussions remain civil. James Cameron or someone one else may get ideas from the Crazy Awesome discriptions of military tactics and rebuttals to them that cause others to refine the suggested tactics further. Also it is some of the funniest stuff I have ever seen. Just read some of the arguements about orbital weaponry and colony drops. They actually appear to be doing their research.
- I agree that they are fun, but it really spoils every other discution because of the tone. I like reading a "Human could have made a colony drop if PR was not a big issue", but hate to read "Cameron is a fag brat and human should have nuked those uffing furries I say use solar powered megalaser and muthafacking plasma sharks!". Or just the fact that someone ostensively ignore the motivation humans just don't nuke Pandora, or tag it as "lame". To sum: no trope is bad, but keep your tone polite.
- Wait...we have plasma sharks!
- Removed an arguement regarding costarica and the united fruit company as well as other things for being to verbose(took up 15% of the page space), wanding far off the topic, and having an agregious amount of info dump from the other wiki when a couple of links would have sufficed.
Great Pikmin Fan: Does this page need a disclaimer saying that it isn't a JBM page for Avatar The Last Airbender?
