What's Happening

Troperville

Tools

collapse/expand topics ykttw archive back to Main/SlidingScaleOfAntiVillains

 

Craver357
topic
06:01:32 AM Feb 22nd 2013
Is it possibly to have a cleanup of Type X examples of Sliding Scale of Anti-Villains, since we already did a cleanup of Sliding Scale Of Anti Heroes?
MithrandirOlorin
topic
07:50:36 AM Oct 17th 2012
I think the Type III overlaps with Type IV Anti-Hero as much as Type III.
gzl5000
topic
12:29:26 AM May 26th 2012
Does Roy Batty really belong in category IV? He may have made a left turn and chosen mercy at the end, but prior to that he commits several brutal murders throughout the film, and takes obvious pleasure in letting James Hong's character freeze to death after ripping his suit in the genetic modification lab. He seems more like a type II, given his obviously evil and sadistic methods for reaching his selfish-but-really-understandable goal of not dying. He's a Woobie, Destroyer of Worlds, simply put. I could see an argument for type III as well, depending on how "noble" you view his goal of avoiding death, and how much he really cares about the other replicants that follow him.
tricksterson
topic
11:55:16 AM Aug 5th 2011
edited by tricksterson
Would like to contend that Candace fits in the "Villain in Name Only" category in that she is an obssessive antagonist to the heroes. However, neurotic and self centered though she is she is far from evil. So she fits there.
tricksterson
11:17:22 AM Aug 12th 2011
edited by tricksterson
Was going to put her back but decided that Heroic Antagonist maybe fits better
KSonik
topic
02:25:28 PM Jun 4th 2011
Since when was alignment ever relevant outside a Dn D context?
ading
topic
07:25:15 AM Apr 10th 2011
edited by ading
Shouldn't this be just "Scale Of Antivillains?" I mean, how could someone slide on the scale?
cclospina
topic
11:26:30 AM Feb 12th 2011
Remove type I and type II, the fact that a character is not a complete monster, does not mean a antivillain.
MagBas
11:41:37 AM Feb 12th 2011
Question: where you guess Noble Demon belongs?
cclospina
01:02:58 PM Feb 12th 2011
edited by cclospina
Any of the three.

Possibly in the type "Anti Villain in name only"
magnum12
04:46:52 PM Feb 16th 2011
edited by magnum12
The reason the original type II existed in the first place was because of the Noble Demon. They're more evil than original type III because for them its a choice rather than something they're driven/pushed to. However, as per the course of the Noble Demon, they have a lot of lines they won't cross or standards they adhere to as they are often restrained in how far they'll go to succeed. Alternatively, their villany is merely a job as opposed to something they enjoy. Both are likely to Pet the Dog as opposed to Kick the Dog. Compare with original type 4 who has legitimate good intentions but uses dark methods to said goal. Perhaps we should name new type I "Disney Anti-Villain" as the Noble Demon is the archtypical Anti-Villain people associate with the trope. Tropes associated with type I are Punch Clock Villain, Would Not Shoot a Civilian, Never Hurt an Innocent, Wouldn't Hurt a Child, Hitman with a Heart, and of course Noble Demon.
ykttw archive back to Main/SlidingScaleOfAntiVillains

TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org.
Privacy Policy