Main Incorruptible Pure Pureness Discussion

Collapse/Expand Topics
 

MagBas
Topic
10:13:41 AM Mar 15th 2015
edited by MagBas
  • Melanie Wilkes from Gone with the Wind was originally supposed to be like this; not exactly by today's standards, since she doesn't seem to have a problem with slavery and enthusiastically supports the South in the Civil War.

look, i am sure that values dissonance not changes the mode as something is portrayed.( To be more explicit, all the "pure" characters created 100 years ago realized cringe- worthy things/ showed cringe-worthy opinions to current values.) But, in either case, this is a Zero-Context Example.
SeptimusHeap
11:06:57 AM Mar 15th 2015
No context, yeah. Keep this off.
chaoticidealism
Topic
02:22:32 PM Oct 9th 2012
Something about the description here hits me the wrong way... it seems to be implying that this sort of a character is bad writing. It can be—and it's easier to mess up than most characters—but I've read several examples that really are fully rounded characters. They don't tend to be main characters; they are more likely to be people who've already faced and defeated temptation, or simply people who are truly innocent and just don't *get* evil to begin with (they will often be saints or non-humans; aliens, angels, the faithful dog, etc.).

I wish I could tweak this to reflect that idea—that this trait is not a hallmark of a bad character, but still very easy to mess up—but I can't really figure out how to express that. Perhaps someone else would be willing to give it a shot.
Bertandernie
Topic
01:09:00 PM Oct 19th 2011
edited by Bertandernie
I added this to the YMMV tab. Is this OK? I just felt like people would have different opinions on who is purely good just like they have different opinions on who is purely evil...
Insignificant
01:32:36 PM Oct 19th 2011
No.
StongRadd
Topic
11:10:50 AM Jan 17th 2011
We need a TV Tropes folder for this page. One of the tropes is Screw the Money, I Have Rules!.
Collapse/Expand Topics