Follow TV Tropes

Ask The Tropers

Go To

Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help. It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread for ongoing cleanup projects.

Ask the Tropers:

Trope Related Question:

Make Private (For security bugs or stuff only for moderators)

Xtifr Since: Jan, 2001
6th Dec, 2016 06:32:44 PM

Um, there's no particular connection between those tropes at all, except that they often happen to be used together. An Apocalypse Maiden or something Sealed Inside a Person-Shaped Can makes a convenient Macguffin, but there's nothing inherently Macguffin-y about those tropes. In the case of The Chosen One, in particular, it's actually rare for one to be a Macguffin, but it's still a common type of Living Macguffin. Many LMs are TCO, but few TCOs are LMs.

edit to clarify: the point of MacGuffin is that it should be important to the characters. These other tropes are simply easy ways of making a living person be important to the other characters.

Edited by Xtifr Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
Xtifr Since: Jan, 2001
6th Dec, 2016 11:41:39 PM

Ah I see what you're saying. (This is in response to where you edited your original post—it would have been clearer if you'd simply replied.) Yes, it can get fuzzy at times. But having character development does not actually stop a person from being a Living MacGuffin. It's not what a character is. It's a role they can play.

For example, in one episode of Bones, the protagonist gets kidnapped, and the rest of the cast spends the episode following clues to try to find her. Despite the fact that she's the protagonist, and a fully developed character, she became a living macguffin for that episode.

Edited by Xtifr Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
RoseBride Since: Jun, 2012
7th Dec, 2016 07:02:30 AM

I see.

It's a bit odd because of the past laconic description (something about them being wanted despite doing nothing IDK) I always assumed that the trope only applied to characters who are only one tier above being living props, if that whereas there are way too many examples and wicks that equate being wanted to being thia trope regarless of the reason or its importance to the plot and I wanted to check that.

As for the 3rd example (along with the Bones one you provided) seems a bit like a stretch to consider them Macguffins since they do affect move around the plot and the Macguffin trope says that in order for something to be this, their special attributte is not just mundane, but also interchangeable with any other special object or character in the setting.

Dunno maybe I'm being too picky, but that sounds like any person with non-mundane special attributes (whether is supernatural, magical, prophecies etc.) that undoubtely affect or move the story for more reasons that their pursue itself would be disqualified of being a Living Macguffin at all.

But again that could be just me.

crazysamaritan MOD Since: Apr, 2010
7th Dec, 2016 08:20:04 AM

Some of the MacGuffin snowclones are more accurately described by the shared supertrope of Plot Device. A Plot Device does not have to be interchangeable with anything else. The Bones example is a MacGuffin (random bystander could be used in place of the character, with her being Trapped by Mountain Lions and unable to help).

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
RoseBride Since: Jun, 2012
7th Dec, 2016 09:14:08 AM

Oh, sorry I never watched Bones so I wasn't aware of the specifics, so in that case is there a trope for a character or object that is very, very important to the plot but the audience is not told why until very late into the story (chances are that it's part of The Reveal) but when it's done it ties in with the plot just fine, and they continue to be important afterwards?

For the rest, checking the Plot Device page they seem to support the idea that for an object or character to truly be a Macguffin (besides the ones already stated) they must be billed as important but never used or said importance to never accomplish anything within the plot right? Following that along with your statement that many Macguffin tropes are snowclones - I agree btw - Is there really such a need for so many of them? Especially when some of them are further divided in even more subtropes - some of them waaay too specific IMO - it feels like the trope really needs a cleanup.

crazysamaritan MOD Since: Apr, 2010
7th Dec, 2016 09:27:12 AM

If you want to build a more though understanding of Plot Device and its subtropes, I suggest starting a thread in Trope Talk.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
RoseBride Since: Jun, 2012
7th Dec, 2016 10:23:53 AM

Maybe I could although dunno if it would be for the Living Macguffin or the Macguffin trope as a whole or its numerous subcategories.

Thank you.

Xtifr Since: Jan, 2001
7th Dec, 2016 11:54:54 AM

When different pages give slightly different definitions of a term, it's often a sign that our definition(s) don't quite match those in the outside world. (Which happens—someone comes along and corrects—or "corrects"—the definition in one place, but not another, and we end up with a variety of definitions scattered across different places.)

So I went to The Other Wiki, and there seems to be some inherent ambiguity in the definition of the term. So much so that they end up just listing three prominent filmmakers and their differing definitions, rather than saying "this is the one."

It does seem to be sort of a mess, and probably worth at least a trope talk thread, if not actual repair shop. Unfortunately, for such a widely used set of tropes, cleanup, if there is a problem, is likely to be a nightmare. *sigh*

Edited by Xtifr Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
Top