Follow TV Tropes

Following

Needs Help: Punk Punk

Go To

Deadlock Clock: Nov 5th 2019 at 11:59:00 PM
eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#76: Apr 30th 2018 at 2:20:43 PM

How does your definition of Formicapunk compare to Cassette Futurism?

Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#77: May 1st 2018 at 3:36:30 AM

Its the same thing just different name, Punk Punk agrees with that too.

SharkToast Since: Mar, 2013
#78: May 7th 2018 at 8:33:40 AM

One thing that I think we should come up with a clear definition for Punk Punk. It seems that a lot of the issues we're discussing here come from the fact that there's no clear definition over what is considered Punk Punk and what isn't.

Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#79: May 7th 2018 at 9:14:30 AM

I will reiterate post 73

The essence of the "punk" genre are about mash ups for their science fiction settings, historical elements in the period its set in, and mixing in modern elements usually sharing the same kind of themes.

Thats it thats the definition.

We have 2 sections like we have now, established genres that were created outside of TV Tropes like Steampunk, Cyberpunk and Clockwork Punk, and second section for TV tropes originals.

eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#80: May 7th 2018 at 1:14:10 PM

I don't see how Cyberpunk follows this definition. I read it as technological dystopia. Please elaborate.

Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Hello, I love you
#81: May 7th 2018 at 1:44:33 PM

To be perfectly frank, the definition is pretty much "this setting ends in -punk."

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
StarSword Captain of USS Bajor from somewhere in deep space Since: Sep, 2011
Captain of USS Bajor
#82: May 7th 2018 at 4:40:47 PM

[up][up]I thought we'd kind of been over that already: the term "-punk" started with Cyberpunk (which was specifically "relatively near-future, Information Age-inspired dystopia") but then the dystopian part was discarded and the "-punk" started getting applied to "setting revolving around a particular fantastic concept, especially as outgrowth of real technology beyond all physical possibility" (e.g. Steampunk, which tends to be a whimsical and fairly upbeat world based around thermodynamics- and materials science-violating use of steam power).

I think The Other Wiki might be a little helpful here: turns out they have a page on cyberpunk derivatives.

A number of cyberpunk derivatives have become recognized as distinct subgenres in speculative fiction.[1] These derivatives, though they do not share cyberpunk's computers-focused setting, may display other qualities drawn from or analogous to cyberpunk: a world built on one particular technology that is extrapolated to a highly sophisticated level (this may even be a fantastical or anachronistic technology, akin to retro-futurism), a gritty transreal urban style, or a particular approach to social themes.

I would be okay with using this as a baseline. I do not like post 73.

edited 7th May '18 6:16:36 PM by StarSword

eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#83: May 7th 2018 at 6:57:44 PM

I also find ^ this definition more approachable.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#84: May 7th 2018 at 8:40:37 PM

[up][up]I find it similar to how I defined it in [1] and [2].

edited 7th May '18 8:41:42 PM by AnotherDuck

Check out my fanfiction!
eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#85: May 8th 2018 at 2:39:48 AM

^ Not seeing it in your definition. This sentence from 82 does it for me: a world built on one particular technology that is extrapolated to a highly sophisticated level. — everything else seems extraneous.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#86: May 8th 2018 at 4:08:59 AM

Well, I didn't mean just one sentence while ignoring the rest.

Check out my fanfiction!
SeptimusHeap MOD from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#87: Aug 22nd 2018 at 12:37:19 AM

Clock is set.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
naturalironist from The Information Superhighway Since: Jul, 2016 Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
#88: Aug 24th 2018 at 9:21:36 AM

What needs to be done here

  1. Agree on a definition of Punk Punk. I have listed possible definitions below, perhaps we could get a crowner?
  2. Re-write Punk Punk to reflect this definition
  3. Sort out which subtropes fit the new definition. I think this would be best along the lines of a Projects thread, where we move through one at a time and decide whether they are valid subtropes. All tropes deemed non-subtropes should be renamed to a non-snowclone name.

Summary of possible definitions:

Definition A

A number of cyberpunk derivatives have become recognized as distinct subgenres in speculative fiction.[1] These derivatives, though they do not share cyberpunk's computers-focused setting, may display other qualities drawn from or analogous to cyberpunk: a world built on one particular technology that is extrapolated to a highly sophisticated level (this may even be a fantastical or anachronistic technology, akin to retro-futurism), a gritty transreal urban style, or a particular approach to social themes.
- ~StarSword and Wikipedia, post 82

Definition B

The essence of the "punk" genre are about mash ups for their science fiction settings, historical elements in the period its set in, and mixing in modern elements usually sharing the same kind of themes.
- ~Memers, post 63 and 70

Definition C

It's a type of setting in a sparse and hostile environment with a reliance on technology (retrofuturistic, Used Future, or otherwise gritty) and a story focused on society or people breaking new grounds. The setting is at least somewhat dark or oppressive (but the story can be comedic).
I don't think it's necessarily the mash-up that makes it, but the exploitative and harsh nature of technology. However, mixing technology levels highlights it as significant in the setting, which is a point. Technology is important.

The same goes for society. It's exploitative, harsh, or otherwise oppressive, and the stories are more down to earth about the people (in that vein it's more comparable to Low Fantasy than High Fantasy). The protagonists are usually rebels of some kind, or merely trying to survive. In more optimistic settings, such as in the shinier versions of Steampunk, they're adventurers.

- ~Another Duck, posts 47 and 61

It seems to me that Definition A includes both B and C.

Edited by naturalironist on Aug 24th 2018 at 12:21:40 PM

"It's just a show; I should really just relax"
Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#89: Aug 24th 2018 at 9:22:14 PM

A does include both however there are many examples that are called that even by that specific wiki page that are only B or C.

Its a very loose and rather new Genre that we didn't create but many people use. B is really the absolute min requirements IMO.

Edited by Memers on Aug 24th 2018 at 9:27:04 AM

StarSword Captain of USS Bajor from somewhere in deep space Since: Sep, 2011
Captain of USS Bajor
#90: Aug 25th 2018 at 4:20:29 PM

I agree most with definition A, because of the simple fact that -punk isn't a single genre (or mashup of specific genres as in post 73), it's a family of genres, each of which focuses on a different particular fantastical element. Other aspects of the setting are optional (the exception being Cyberpunk, for which non-dystopian versions are generally classed as Post-Cyberpunk).

For comparison, look at Science Fiction: It comprises stereotypical Space Opera (e.g. Star Trek), as well as "social science fiction" that has little to no technological fantasticness (Person of Interest, The Handmaid's Tale).

Once we decide on that, we also need to decide which of our -punk tropes/genres actually count.

Edited by StarSword on Aug 25th 2018 at 7:24:56 AM

naturalironist from The Information Superhighway Since: Jul, 2016 Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#92: Aug 27th 2018 at 2:35:40 AM

Not seeing much overlap between A and B/C.

What if we take the known punk tropes and sort them into the definitions the are closest to. This would already give us an idea of what tropes we are about to discard before we even decide what definition we are going with.

naturalironist from The Information Superhighway Since: Jul, 2016 Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
#93: Aug 27th 2018 at 4:52:13 AM

[up] Ok if we do that for Cyberpunk and Steampunk, since those are the basis for all of these. But this thread has gotten repeatedly derailed by people arguing about whether specific subtropes even exist or not, and I think the task would be easier with specific criteria about what counts.

"It's just a show; I should really just relax"
Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#94: Aug 27th 2018 at 5:23:53 AM

Honestly I just think we need to split it between exterior genres and TV Tropes originals and tighten up a few specific pages.

StarSword Captain of USS Bajor from somewhere in deep space Since: Sep, 2011
Captain of USS Bajor
#95: Aug 30th 2018 at 6:19:27 PM

[up][up]Honestly I don't think it's really very hard to decide if a particular "punk" page has enough works to legitimately be a "genre". That, IMHO, is what we should most be concerned with once we get to the subtropes stage.

For example (trying to address a concern without derailing the thread in the exact way the concern was concerned about tongue), Atom Punk versus Desert Punk. Atom Punk is maybe a genre, albeit I don't personally know any works that would fit it besides Fallout, but it focuses on extrapolation of nuclear technology far beyond what happened in real life (e.g. I've read about concept nuclear-powered passenger cars similar Fallout's Corvega, they just didn't happen because do you want to frakking give your customer radiation poisoning?). Whereas Desert Punk is just a Non-Indicative Title; it's about desert planets, not a genre.

Edited by StarSword on Aug 30th 2018 at 9:19:03 AM

eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#96: Aug 30th 2018 at 7:49:42 PM

When I read Desert Punk I thought about settings like in the Mad Max franchise but apparently that's something else.

Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#97: Aug 31st 2018 at 12:01:16 PM

[up] That trope is written about Space Westerns, literal Sci-fi Western set on an alien planet and such.

IMO it is quite a bit more specific and restrictive than a usual punk trope needs to be. Mad Max is appropriate for a real Desert Punk trope.

Edited by Memers on Aug 31st 2018 at 12:01:08 PM

Lymantria Tyrannoraptoran Reptiliomorph from Toronto Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Historians will say we were good friends.
Tyrannoraptoran Reptiliomorph
Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#99: Sep 4th 2018 at 5:28:57 PM

[up] Except for the definition has expanded greatly in Cyberpunk Derivatives, which is what these Futuristic, Retrofuturistic and Fantastic genres are.

Edited by Memers on Sep 4th 2018 at 5:30:11 AM

naturalironist from The Information Superhighway Since: Jul, 2016 Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
#100: Sep 5th 2018 at 1:49:05 PM

[up] Are there specific cyberpunk derivatives that wouldn't fit definition A?

"It's just a show; I should really just relax"

PageAction: PunkPunk
23rd Sep '18 1:08:48 PM

Crown Description:

Punk Punk has an unclear definition and there has been much discussion on what to do with it. Reference post.

Total posts: 152
Top