TV Tropes Needs Your Help
Total posts:  1 2 3 5 6
We have an entire list of tropes that is essentially "this originated/has more meaning in Japan but is possible in the west", particularly Seme and Uke, Sensei-chan, School Idol, Salaryman, and Panty Thief.
edited 9th Jan '13 12:47:29 PM by KingZeal
Christmas worms@76: These tropes have already defined reasons to be separate. This one doesn't. @75: Considering the need for manforce in TRS, I'd be welcoming you here.
What reasons? For example, what makes Salaryman not just "White Collar Worker in Japan"?
edited 9th Jan '13 12:52:53 PM by KingZeal
Geronimo!I strongly disagree with the idea that tropes can be culturally unique, but that is a matter to discuss elsewhere. For now, the point remains that there is no viable distinction between the Japanese and general versions of this trope.
edited 9th Jan '13 12:53:25 PM by Fighteer
I can prove that wrong. Here is the cultural definition I wrote last page. Go through I Will Protect Her and I Will Definitely Protect You and count how many Western examples fit that definition.
edited 9th Jan '13 1:00:26 PM by KingZeal
Geronimo!The example from Memory Sorrow And Thorn that I just added to I Will Protect Her fits that definition exactly. Guy pines for girl, believes his love to be unrequited (or unrequitable), declares Protectorate as a means of sublimating desire (and hopefully invoking Relationship Upgrade via Bodyguard Crush). It's a universal trope, my friend. You are reading way too much into a single cultural variant of it. Also, part of the reason for the poor adoption of I Will Protect Her is undoubtedly the dialog-based title. I didn't even know about it until I read this thread, at which point I immediately thought of a new example. And there are a lot of anime/manga examples already on I Will Protect Her, and you still haven't explained why that article cites the exact same phrase that you seem to think denotes something special and unique.
edited 9th Jan '13 1:08:17 PM by Fighteer
Christmas wormsIf that variant is really distinct, you are in time to YKTTW it after we merged the pages.
The example from Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn that I just added to I Will Protect Her fits that definition exactly. Guy pines for girl, believes his love to be unrequited (or unrequitable), declares Protectorate as a means of sublimating desire (and hopefully invoking Relationship Upgrade via Bodyguard Crush).Er...possibly. But not the way you've written it. Is there, at any point, a time when he says this in front of her or another person, and she either understands his meaning or someone else who feels that protecting her is the same as romance? Because that's basically the archetype in Japanese media. It's not just "I will protect her because I love her". It's an assumption that "I will protect her" is essentially a marriage proposal. Your example sounds more like a Bodyguard Crush that happened to work.
Also, part of the reason for the poor adoption of I Will Protect Her is undoubtedly the dialog-based title. I didn't even know about it until I read this thread, at which point I immediately thought of a new example.And there are a lot of anime/manga examples already on I Will Protect Her.
and you still haven't explained why that article cites the exact same phrase that you seem to think denotes something special and unique.For the same reason that any subtrope is cited on a parent trope?
edited 9th Jan '13 1:20:32 PM by KingZeal
Geronimo!Dear gods, King Zeal, the trope describes the entirety of the chivalry movement in Romantic literature. And yes, in my example, the princess in question knows damn well that Simon wants her and is determined to push him away for her own reasons; she accepts his offer to protect her in the hopes that it will distract him. And yes, it does end in a Relationship Upgrade once she acknowledges her feelings for him.
edited 9th Jan '13 1:20:54 PM by Fighteer
Then it isn't the trope I described. EDIT: Specifically, her willingness to accept his protection "to distract him" is where the problem lies in your example. In the examples of this trope I've personally seen (again, largely in asian media), the girl will only accept if she intends to return his feelings. If she doesn't, she will either deny him, say that it's a misunderstanding, or otherwise. Because accepting it outright is basically the same as accepting his intentions.
edited 9th Jan '13 1:36:20 PM by KingZeal
Geronimo!That's just a minor variant, far smaller than the distinctions already observed in I Will Protect Her. All it needs is a statement, "In Asian media, the female will typically accept only if she wishes to return the male's affections." You are vastly overthinking this.
edited 9th Jan '13 1:37:59 PM by Fighteer
Christmas wormsOk, do we want a merge-or-not option/crowner here? I can see the discussion entering into a circle from afar.
Here Is Your Throat Back, Thanks For The LoanSounds like a good idea, but first we need to call the current. It's been stable.
Christmas wormsThe current crowner has a contrasting "redefine" option.
Geronimo!The crowner options were premature, I suspect. Nobody really explored the idea that it was functionally identical to another trope; it was just assumed that the "Japanese variant" was a distinct concept.
That's just a minor variant, far smaller than the distinctions already observed in I Will Protect Her.That's actually a different problem which I was going to reserve for a different discussion. I find that trope page to be too damn busy, personally.
Christmas wormsSo, do we make a new crowner? I've seen that adding wholly new options to an already- running crowner tends to make a mess.
Geronimo!I think we need to scrap that crowner and start over, yes. I suppose I have to invoke my modly powers. Hang on a bit.
Geronimo!I think I got it. Did I miss anything?
Christmas wormsOnly to rename the thread to reflect that the crowner was changed. Nothing else is missing.
Am I allowed to add options beyond the two?
Christmas wormsWhat option?
Geronimo!Propose it, please.
Christmas wormsI don't have any objections, but please link to a finished description draft.
TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from firstname.lastname@example.org.