Genres and movements of fine art are definitely tropes, not useful notes.
Agree. It would be like moving Fantasy to Useful Notes.Fantasy
edited 5th Jul '12 9:47:39 AM by Catbert
Can you give an example where they are used as tropes?
Fantasy isn't a trope either. It is a genre.
According to post 2, genre is a trope.
Tropes are defined as storytelling conventions. I am pretty sure "genre" falls under that definition, and not the Useful Notes one, which are defined as:
- To debunk common media stereotypes.
- To help you understand some media better.
- To educate, inform, and sometimes entertain.
A genre's more of a collection of tropes though, right? A work belongs in X genre if it uses many of the following n tropes.
(Not that it matters... genres go on main, and you can link to them as you would any trope, and any index on Art should list Art genres.)
As things are right now, genres go on the main namespace are their page type is "trope". For all effective purposes, we seem to treat them as tropes.
Genres are tropes. Locking this.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
Some of the Art tropes are not tropes at all. I could make a topic for every single one of them, but I can barely open one, whenever I try, it says it's over 400 thread limit.
Movements:
- Art Deco — Really a Useful Notes?
- Art Nouveau— Really a Useful Notes?
- Dada— Really a Useful Notes?
- Surrealism— Really a Useful Notes?
If there are more movements added, should they be Useful Notes as well?Tropes:
edited 4th Jul '12 12:49:31 PM by drdeathray