The Place for Purging Porn and Pedo-Pandering (AKA P5 flag evaluations)

I read Naga Eyes.

That was just a giant pile of literary horse apples in my eyes, not "utterly disgusting". I guarantee I've seen worse.

edited 12th May '12 3:38:50 PM by Raidouthe21st

We Are Our Avatars Forever (Now on Discord by invitation, PM)

So why do you need a drink? (offtopic)

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

Just reported Popotan. Check the reviews page - it's apparently hardcore lolicon, even in the Bleached Underpants anime, more so in the H-game.

?

@Septimus: Because I'm thirsty, of course.

Anyway, Popotan... well, now...

Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.

"kiddie porn", a reviewer said, according to Wikipedia. This review is also notable (maybe)

edited 12th May '12 3:44:31 PM by SeptimusHeap

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

Here is the full review Septimus noted, for reference.

"Polite life will fill you full of cancer." - Iggy Pop "I've seen the future, brother, it is murder." -Leonard Cohen

Out of curiosity, how is the P5 council approaching prioritizing which works need to be reviewed? It doesn't seem to be entirely based on the date reported.

The reason I ask is there is one work (I'll be brave and admit I'm the one who originally flagged it) that I think really needs review sooner rather than later, since the results of whatever decision gets made have quite a few ramifications beyond the content policy.

Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)

Oh just nuke it and be done with it :P

I mean, apparently, it references Kn J so we know it's gonna happen eventually.

...Calling for a review of a forum game?

...

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh boy...

We Are Our Avatars Forever (Now on Discord by invitation, PM)

It is/was a roleplay on this very forum.

The ninja's have struck again!

edited 12th May '12 4:03:47 PM by TheOneWhoTropes

Keeper of The Celestial Flame

I don't know, I saw role-plays of at least two characters from Kn J kissing *

, on one page. Mind, I didn't read past it, so I can't give you too many details on it.

^ Is.

edited 12th May '12 4:03:17 PM by BlackDove

Those both got devil head votes from me. Porn and possible pedoshit, and definitely pedoshit.

"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.

No. I don't know, there was more stuff in the old one (I'm not checking out the with onions one), but I never remember liking it.

Okay, I still find it ridiculous, but for what it's worth, goign by the latest posts, Kagami and onions looks to just be a silly action role-play, with some kissing, and… I am just going to assume it's all over the board, but more "action"-oriented than the older one, because I am not going through even twenty-five pages of that.

Not to say that I agree with any of it though. Rather, I think a cut would be nice, so I'm with The One.

edited 12th May '12 4:49:26 PM by BlackDove

Yes, why are people playing at being children who are HAVING SEX WITH EACH OTHER?

We're all living in a glass house.

I'm sure Martello will agree with me when I say that these sort of Roleplays are creepy shit we don't want (and FE probably will as well.)

Keeper of The Celestial Flame

Yeah, if people want creepy roleplaying, there are sites out there that cater to that kind of thing.

On a different subject, I'm not sure why Nana To Kaoru was tagged. From what I have read, it is sexual in that it deals with BDSM, but far as I read (which was around chapter 12, or so, I think), there is no outright sex, if any. It's pretty much them, oddly enough, bonding by way of BDSM, but that definitely isn't the main focus. It makes sense in context*

. I'm not sure if this is fully against the rules, considering it's not pornographic insofar as what I saw (maybe someone who has read it all the way through can tell you. It seems aimed for the 16-18 year olds anyway*

Personally, I feel it's labeled as seinen purely for the subject matter

.

Kamisama Dolls too, doesn't look like something that should be cut either. Same for Kore wa Zombie desu ka, which, from what I have heard from my friend is your typical shounen-magical plot fare with the usual fanservice, quite a bit of it, but an actual plot. Least, that's my interpretation. I have also read and watched Boku wa Tomodachi ga Sukunai, and it is pretty much just losers being jerks to each other and bonding from it.

Should Zeorymer be looked at? I know nothing about it, but according to Anime, it features a teenage girl who is without explanation drawn as a preteen when she's naked, and said character receiving oral sex from an old man.

Still endorse cutting the trope page but I just rambled about problems I had in the past basically. Sorry.

edited 12th May '12 5:32:09 PM by AnnoR

"Oh, dear. The toad, the monkey, and the dog have all screwed up."

Kore Wa Zombie Desu Ka doesn't have anything enormously pervy from what I've seen. The occasional fanservice sure, but it's mostly a zombie guy in a mahou shoujo outfit wielding a chainsaw.

With respect to Haganai, I already gave an evaluation upthread starting here with verdict here. As for Kamisama Dolls, I can take a look. For Kore Wa Zombie Desu Ka I can vouch that it's not cutworthy and will give a full evaluation at request.

"Polite life will fill you full of cancer." - Iggy Pop "I've seen the future, brother, it is murder." -Leonard Cohen

Pages Pending For Perusal By P 5 is updated with the latest decisions.

@Black Dove: Nana To Kaoru could use closer watch for cleaning up possible creepy gushing, considering the intensive Fetish Fuel factor.

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.

Nana To Kaoru does need watching for creepy gushing, but it doesn't seem to be porn, just fanservice heavy and it's two 17 year olds.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick

Another plea for changing the flagging tool to require an explanation:

1. It would give an extra step, allowing people who hit it by accident (fat fingers or trying to set the page type) to cancel out.
2. It would make catching trolls easier.
3. It would help mods spot non-trolls who don't really understand what the purpose of all this is, and are flagging things that don't need to be flagged in all sincerity.
4. It would enable people who are flagging works in the belief the pages will be kept, just to get that sanction, to explain this (lest they look like trolls).

Obviously the explanation wouldn't be binding on 5P; the panel would not be obliged to cut anything flagged for cutting, keep anything flagged as in 4, or cut anything for the reason given by the person flagging it, so it wouldn't affect their authority in a meaningful way.

The child is father to the man —Oedipus

I think that's probably a good idea.

"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.