Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Per the site owner, AI generated images are allowed on TV Tropes and will be treated just like regular images.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by kory on May 2nd 2024 at 11:16:14 AM

eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#1301: Nov 24th 2015 at 8:43:32 AM

^^^ Good point. Is it even possible to exclude starred threads (waiting for caption) from thread cap?

edited 24th Nov '15 8:45:34 AM by eroock

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1302: Nov 24th 2015 at 10:29:02 AM

All the star does is indicated that the thread is in the final stages of work; it still takes up space on the forum. Also, the number of starred threads at any given time is still heavily outweighed by the number of threads that are needing discussion so it really doesn't help to not consider them in the final count.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#1303: Nov 24th 2015 at 10:54:50 AM

Got an idea of the number of threads that are basically just waiting for more votes, with no formal crowner?

And speaking just for myself, lately I've found a lot of threads I just consider meh. Nothing I'd vote for in a crowner, but also nothing I'd call for removal, so I just don't say anything.

edited 24th Nov '15 10:57:41 AM by AnotherDuck

Check out my fanfiction!
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1304: Nov 24th 2015 at 11:14:03 AM

As of right now, we have 101 active threads (not counting the pinned ones). Of those, 6 have crowners, 9 are starred, and 6 are clocked (one may need a crowner, I just bumped it), so that's a total of 80 threads in the general discussion phase.

edited 24th Nov '15 11:26:27 AM by Willbyr

Morgenthaler Since: Feb, 2016
#1305: Nov 26th 2015 at 3:01:36 AM

I'd say that number of threads at the discussion phase can be further split into two categories:

  • Threads with otherwise good suggestions (usually 1 or 2) but lack a few votes to make it over the consensus threshold.
  • Threads that stall for some other reason, such as no good options and no one out looking for alternatives, or technical disputes (how many images are we allowed to use, is this trope really picturable, etc.).

I think it's the first group that's the problem here. The latter group tend to be complex enough that extended discussion is required to pin the best action down, but the former routinely get stuck waiting for resolution for weeks.

Anyway, I'll join the consensus that lowering the clocking period to 14 days would be beneficial to the turnover rate.

edited 26th Nov '15 12:44:09 PM by Morgenthaler

You've got roaming bands of armed, aggressive, tyrannical plumbers coming to your door, saying "Use our service, or else!"
eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#1306: Nov 26th 2015 at 7:50:54 AM

^ Concur. If we look at the life cycle of most threads, the traffic slows down rapidly after the opening phase. There are only few threads that come back strong after a week of inactivity. So a shorter clocking period is not really depriving us of much.

Morgenthaler Since: Feb, 2016
#1307: Nov 30th 2015 at 10:19:38 AM

BTW, it seems my question on the previous page got buried. Do the copyright rules restrict us from using an artpiece from a printed and sold t-shirt?

You've got roaming bands of armed, aggressive, tyrannical plumbers coming to your door, saying "Use our service, or else!"
ShadowHog from Earth Since: May, 2009 Relationship Status: Healthy, deeply-felt respect for this here Shotgun
#1308: Nov 30th 2015 at 10:23:19 AM

If it does, then we really need that thread on Cue the Flying Pigs.

edited 30th Nov '15 10:23:36 AM by ShadowHog

Moon
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1309: Nov 30th 2015 at 7:26:17 PM

I'm gonna err on the side of caution and say that we need to go ahead and start a thread for that page.

[/MOD MODE]

As of right now: 79 active threads, 4 w/crowners, 11 starred (and most will probably be closed in the next day or two), and 2 clocked. Making good progress on the backlog. [tup]

edited 30th Nov '15 7:28:37 PM by Willbyr

ShadowHog from Earth Since: May, 2009 Relationship Status: Healthy, deeply-felt respect for this here Shotgun
#1310: Nov 30th 2015 at 8:40:50 PM

I'll go ahead and make a thread.

Moon
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#1311: Nov 30th 2015 at 10:48:31 PM

Based on what I know from Wikipedia's policies, "respect for commercial opportunities" is a major factor in fair use law. Using a photo of a shirt for sale would not impinge much but a photo for sale would.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1312: Nov 30th 2015 at 11:01:27 PM

Seems like a good point to me.

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#1313: Nov 30th 2015 at 11:38:18 PM

We should link to who is selling the shirt then I guess?

Morgenthaler Since: Feb, 2016
#1314: Dec 1st 2015 at 12:23:47 AM

It's the difference between something like the t-shirt pic on Everything Sounds Sexier in French and All Your Powers Combined. I agree that the former isn't problematic, but for the latter I'm wondering if fair use allows us to use it when it's technically the whole artwork that the shirt is based on. I just don't know if it makes a difference that they're not selling the image by itself.

edited 1st Dec '15 12:26:04 AM by Morgenthaler

You've got roaming bands of armed, aggressive, tyrannical plumbers coming to your door, saying "Use our service, or else!"
eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#1315: Dec 3rd 2015 at 1:33:44 AM

Coming back to the issue of waiting periods for caption suggestions. In general, I don't mind having 10 threads waiting for a call on the caption, but I wonder if this process could be sped up in times when there is a cue of new requests waiting in the wings.

edited 3rd Dec '15 3:42:09 PM by eroock

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1316: Dec 4th 2015 at 7:09:49 AM

Update: 67 active threads w/3 crowners, 2 starred, and 7 clocked.

eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#1317: Dec 6th 2015 at 4:18:18 AM

When will the forum be opened again for new discussions?

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1318: Dec 6th 2015 at 4:58:49 PM

Dunno...the last time this happened, I think we'd gotten the backlog cut down to where the forum maybe had 40 threads in it total when it was greenlit for new threads. Unlike TRS where fixes are fairly critical, we're not under any kind of time constraint, except that it would be better to keep discussion going so threads can be closed out faster.

I'm going to start trickling in some of the recent locked requests soon, but I don't have a timeframe on when.

EDIT: I'm going to be really busy tomorrow so I'm going to go ahead and bump crowners right now.

edited 6th Dec '15 5:00:54 PM by Willbyr

eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#1319: Dec 7th 2015 at 1:17:43 AM

Perhaps it's only me but discussing the same topics for weeks is getting boring. What is the reason behind having such long waiting periods instead of allowing requests in as they fit?

edited 7th Dec '15 1:22:55 AM by eroock

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#1320: Dec 7th 2015 at 1:33:41 AM

Because the forum then becomes clogged with unactioned requests that split people's attention up.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1321: Dec 7th 2015 at 8:22:57 PM

Update: As of right now, we have 60 unpinned threads, w/10 crowners, 5 starred, and 10 clocked, and two of those would be cleared out by now if I knew what to do with them.

Karxrida The Unknown from Eureka, the Forbidden Land Since: May, 2012 Relationship Status: I LOVE THIS DOCTOR!
The Unknown
#1322: Dec 7th 2015 at 8:36:49 PM

Which 2?

If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Karxrida The Unknown from Eureka, the Forbidden Land Since: May, 2012 Relationship Status: I LOVE THIS DOCTOR!
The Unknown
#1324: Dec 8th 2015 at 6:36:19 AM

I'd keep Gangplank Galleon open for a bit longer since it's a collage (thus more images need to be approved).

If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1325: Dec 12th 2015 at 10:17:21 AM

At the rate that people are making new requests, the forum's going to end up being just as clogged up when it re-opens as it was before. Hold off unless there's a serious issue with a page pic, like the NSFW one that I replaced on Blood Knight (thanks, Morgenthaler).

edited 12th Dec '15 10:18:07 AM by Willbyr


Total posts: 9,746
Top