Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Per the site owner, AI generated images are allowed on TV Tropes and will be treated just like regular images.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by kory on May 2nd 2024 at 11:16:14 AM

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#1001: Mar 3rd 2015 at 11:52:07 AM

I like manga, and I read a lot of it, if that's relevant. Doesn't make it hard for me to realise that on an English site images are read left to right, no matter what source. That's why I doubt the argument that it makes it confusing for manga readers to find flipped images.

Check out my fanfiction!
ThePope Since: Oct, 2010
#1002: Mar 3rd 2015 at 12:55:22 PM

If you go to any English manga site, you'll find all the manga right to left.

Just saiyan.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#1003: Mar 3rd 2015 at 12:56:50 PM

We are not a manga site, though. And all articles are in the Western order.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
JapaneseTeeth Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing from Meinong's jungle Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Mu
Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing
#1004: Mar 3rd 2015 at 7:39:27 PM

[up]Which has been my argument.

That said, the idea of simply changing the text around while leaving the image itself alone would be a perfectly workable compromise, so long as the speech bubbles allow for it.

Reaction Image Repository
lexicon Since: May, 2012
#1005: Mar 3rd 2015 at 8:12:33 PM

The established "ruling" is that images should be in the western style because "We just don't want images that are confusing for most readers." https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1317986693061200100&page=33#807

MrL1193 Since: Apr, 2013
#1006: Mar 3rd 2015 at 9:36:33 PM

[up] Yes, that is what Fast Eddie decreed the first time this issue came up. That does not mean, however, that that ruling is set in stone. (At least, that's what I was told the last time this was discussed.)

MarqFJA The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer from Deserts of the Middle East (Before Recorded History) Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
#1007: Mar 4th 2015 at 2:25:47 AM

A little off-topic, but would anyone object if we modify the stickied post so that the Wall of Text gets folderized?

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1008: Mar 4th 2015 at 2:30:16 AM

^^ Right now it is set in stone. "Frozen" is probably a better metaphor, though.

edited 4th Mar '15 2:34:20 AM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
MrL1193 Since: Apr, 2013
#1009: Mar 4th 2015 at 3:05:35 PM

If you had looked further down that page, you would have seen that the post I linked to came after that announcement. So no, it's not set in stone, and at any rate, it seems silly to argue after all this debate (without a mod telling us to knock it off, I might add) that this discussion never should have happened.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#1010: Mar 4th 2015 at 3:14:09 PM

I am going to say, given the way the discussion has been going, I would call it as "no consensus" and thus default to the prior policy, i.e Eddie's judgment.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
TargetmasterJoe Since: May, 2013
#1011: Mar 9th 2015 at 12:03:51 PM

Okay, this is my first time in this particular thread, but...

I want to post a picture for the Kate Leth page, but I don't really know where to start or how this works.

Anyone wanna point me to the right direction?

EDIT: For what it's worth, I'm considering either this one, this one or maybe this one?

edited 9th Mar '15 12:17:56 PM by TargetmasterJoe

ShadowHog from Earth Since: May, 2009 Relationship Status: Healthy, deeply-felt respect for this here Shotgun
#1012: Mar 9th 2015 at 1:16:49 PM

Start a new thread. Point it to Creator.Kate Leth. Set the reason for listing as "Suggestion". Put all three images in your opening post. Wait for it to be unlocked, and we'll start debating which one works best.

Alternatively, if you have an absolute favorite, just upload it. Adding images is a free action, no thread required, and all three images look like they'd work just fine for a Creator/ page.

Moon
Rethkir A Trusted Friend in Science and Ponies from the gap between dimensions Since: Mar, 2013
#1013: Mar 13th 2015 at 4:14:46 AM

Threads not becoming opened is still an issue. As of now, there are 6 unopened threads, some of which date back from nearly a month ago. I said it before and I'll continue saying it: do we really need moderator approval to open an IP thread? I mean, if a thread is not worth discussion, a moderator can always close it, and hopefully other members would know better as well and point it out as such. But those threads are in the minority. So why do we still have this annoying system that is doing more hindering than good?

Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.
rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1014: Mar 13th 2015 at 3:59:52 PM

I agree.

There is more discussion about it starting around page 34 of this thread.

Several or many IP regulars have said (both before and after the change was implemented) either "there was no issue with backlog in IP" or "backlog in IP was not an issue" and that changing the hard cap should not be done at all there; on the IP forum, it is a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. For TRS it makes sense, for IP it causes more harm than good. If something is a bad suggestion, it will be identified as such by discussion.

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
ThePope Since: Oct, 2010
#1015: Mar 13th 2015 at 4:02:25 PM

Yeah, I see no reason why threads need to be approved. I think most people on here are sane enough to see a pointless thread and criticize it as such, which will lead to a lock. But leaving 5 or so threads frozen and untouched is problematic.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#1016: Mar 13th 2015 at 4:03:46 PM

The currently unopened threads were just raised on moderator chat for discussion.

I have no particular opinion on removing the thread approval system, but I'll note that one scope of the approval system is to shut down badly argued OPs.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#1017: Mar 13th 2015 at 4:05:28 PM

Maybe mods can just bump older threads saying what needs to be done next to keep the ball rolling? As long as pressure to keep threads moving exists I don't see a big backlog occurring.

Bad threads are a thing yes, but mostly in the repair shop I think?

edited 13th Mar '15 4:06:40 PM by Memers

ThePope Since: Oct, 2010
#1018: Mar 13th 2015 at 4:05:41 PM

Except we should be smart enough to detect badly constructed O Ps as soon as they pop up and be able to point out one another that it's bad.

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1019: Mar 13th 2015 at 4:11:39 PM

"...one scope of the approval system is to shut down badly argued O Ps."

  1. That is an issue in TRS much more than in IP.
  2. That is not the apparent standard in IP, anyway. Threads get opened without a suggestion in the OP, and not opened based on one person's opinion that a suggestion is not good.

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
lexicon Since: May, 2012
#1020: Mar 13th 2015 at 7:47:22 PM

I understand having to prove a problem in TRS but in IP it's easy to identify bad image vs good image vs one that can use improvement.

Rethkir A Trusted Friend in Science and Ponies from the gap between dimensions Since: Mar, 2013
#1021: Mar 13th 2015 at 8:37:25 PM

Even bad suggestions can lead to discussion that leads to good images, and those threads get opened anyway. It's only not worth opening when the current is really good and the reason for changing is invalid. This approval system in IP never made sense to me.

Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1022: Mar 13th 2015 at 9:35:01 PM

Anyone saying IP doesn't have a backlog needs to take another look at the thread count...we had the count down somewhere in the low 40s and then it blew up and never recovered. I was so happy when the count finally dipped below 50...

Part of the problem with the current system is that, while I do look at every thread request when I see it come in, there are some that I would like to have a second opinion on before making a decision. The problem is that said second opinion doesn't always happen, even when it's requested through our channels. I've asked for an auto-pinger that notifies when a thread sits for too long several times now but it's still floating somewhere in the B-tier priority list for tech stuff.

ShadowHog from Earth Since: May, 2009 Relationship Status: Healthy, deeply-felt respect for this here Shotgun
#1023: Mar 13th 2015 at 9:45:36 PM

Granted, but I can't help but think having threads sitting around unopened isn't easing that backlog much either. If it were open already, you'd probably get that second opinion PDQ. (I mean, it'd probably be from some random IPD regular instead of staff, but it'd be an opinion nonetheless...)

edited 13th Mar '15 9:45:51 PM by ShadowHog

Moon
rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1024: Mar 13th 2015 at 10:13:28 PM

Re: "Anyone saying IP doesn't have a backlog..." My intended meaning was that people either said "there is no backlog in IP" or "there is backlog in IP, but that's okay". This response addresses only the first sentiment.

Re: "Even bad suggestions can lead to discussion that leads to good images..." That is one of the reasons why I don't think threads should be declined because the suggestion is subjectively bad; only when the thread is objectively invalid. Unfortunately, while that standard is apparently used in TRS, it is not apparently used in IP, which magnifies the problem of the "approval system" being inappropriate for IP.

The thread about the "approval system" change is 238 posts long, and they're almost all about TRS. (And the few mentions of IP are mostly about the change not being needed there!) I don't understand why it was applied to IP also.

edited 13th Mar '15 10:54:55 PM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#1025: Mar 17th 2015 at 5:48:25 AM

I've folderized the OP, seeing as now folders work in posts.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

Total posts: 9,751
Top