Follow TV Tropes

Following

Sex Scenes

Go To

MarkVonLewis Since: Jun, 2010
#26: Jan 10th 2011 at 9:26:15 PM

Honestly I've debated making a foray into the trashy romance novel field, if only because it seems like ridiculous descriptions is the norm. And it'd be fun to write.

Plus, I totally want to write an entirely alliterative sex scene.

MildGuy I squeeze gats. from the bed I made. Since: Jan, 2011
I squeeze gats.
#27: Jan 10th 2011 at 9:41:25 PM

I guess that's where the disconnect is at for me. If other kinds of acts are interesting or entertaining to read about, then why is sex so objectionable? Is there a trope for that?

I haven't read a trashy romance novel yet, but I've read plenty of genre books that do have sex scenes in varying degrees of intensity. I usually enjoy them, though not always for the same reason.

I must not be a normal reader.

silvercat Since: Jan, 2001
#28: Jan 10th 2011 at 9:42:51 PM

Hmmm... It depends on the story, I suppose. Most of the time I don't want to read sex. I've gotten some recently-published books of short stories and it seemed like every second one had a sex scene. Why? I realize sex is fun and everything (and how!), but c'mon. On the other hand, if it goes with the story, well go for it.

Personally, I tend to limit my sex scenes to when I'm writing porn. But that's just me.

www.curiouslylydean.net - comics, writing, and other geeky things
TParadox Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: The captain of her heart
SandJosieph Bigonkers! is Magic from Grand Galloping Galaday Since: Dec, 2009 Relationship Status: Brony
Bigonkers! is Magic
#30: Jan 11th 2011 at 2:12:15 PM

Uh...any advice on how to write a sex scene between an M1 Abrams Tank and a Little Red Sportcar?

♥♥II'GSJQGDvhhMKOmXunSrogZliLHGKVMhGVmNhBzGUPiXLYki'GRQhBITqQrrOIJKNWiXKO♥♥
Five_X Maelstrom Since: Feb, 2010
Maelstrom
#31: Jan 11th 2011 at 3:39:15 PM

Use all the phallic symbolism available in the tank's gun. There's a lot there. Firearms of all kinds are excellent set up for Freud Was Right.

edited 11th Jan '11 3:40:25 PM by Five_X

I write pretty good fanfiction, sometimes.
Carbonpillow Writer Since: Jul, 2010
#32: Jan 11th 2011 at 5:19:44 PM

Battlecanon meets tailpipe.

I feel bad for the sports car.

The Blood God's design consultant.
EnglishIvy Since: Aug, 2011
ImipolexG frozen in time from all our yesterdays Since: Jan, 2001
frozen in time
#34: Jan 11th 2011 at 5:54:05 PM

penis

no one will notice that I changed this
Five_X Maelstrom Since: Feb, 2010
pathfinder Swords are for wimps from Bearbrass Since: Nov, 2010
Swords are for wimps
#36: Jan 11th 2011 at 7:58:35 PM

Is it bad to admit that you need help with this type of writing, or that you've been doing a lot of research?

The terrible downside to multiple identities: multiple tax returns
drunkscriblerian Street Writing Man from Castle Geekhaven Since: Oct, 2010 Relationship Status: In season
Street Writing Man
#37: Jan 11th 2011 at 7:59:19 PM

@pathfinder: No, and it would depend on the type of "research".

If I were to write some of the strange things that come under my eyes they would not be believed. ~Cora M. Strayer~
LoniJay from Australia Since: Dec, 2009 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
#38: Jan 13th 2011 at 4:49:32 AM

Personally I prefer when a book has a few sentences that make it clear that, yes, sex is going on, and then skips to later. Or a couple of sentences describing in a fairly abstract way how it made the characters feel.

In my own work, I highly doubt there will be any sex going on, but if there is, I'm pretty sure I'd want it to fly over the heads of kids. For example, I read Tamora Pierce books when I was about 9 or 10. Characters would kiss, whisper something romantic to each other and go into a bedroom. As a 9 year old, I thought "Oh, they're kissing in the bedroom. Moving on." It wasn't until a reread a few years later that I realised Alanna and Jonathan had actually slept together, and I kind of like that.

I find scenes that are trying to be romantic that actually describe the, well, equipment fail. Because there is no romantic word for them.

Be not afraid...
MarkVonLewis Since: Jun, 2010
#39: Jan 18th 2011 at 12:19:01 AM

C;mon, you mean calling it a "meaty shaft of romancing +1" ISN'T romantic?

Carbonpillow Writer Since: Jul, 2010
#40: Jan 18th 2011 at 12:54:00 AM

.+1? pft, how much romancing can that do?

edited 18th Jan '11 12:54:15 AM by Carbonpillow

The Blood God's design consultant.
CyganAngel Away on the wind~ from Arcadia Since: Oct, 2010
Away on the wind~
#41: Jan 18th 2011 at 1:38:13 AM

He used a Potion of Sexual Enhancement beforehand.

There are too many toasters in my chimney!
MisterAlways Go away. from The Netherlands. Since: Jan, 2001
Go away.
#42: Jan 18th 2011 at 9:52:56 AM

Well, ostensibly, it can do one more romance than your average cock.

Enough for me.

Always touching and looking. Piss off.
Boredknight Amateur Worldbuilder from Canada Since: Aug, 2010
Amateur Worldbuilder
#43: Jan 19th 2011 at 5:47:14 PM

Most of the books I've read containing that sort of thing have been something between one and two. They don't skip over the act, and sometimes they go a little into it, but never anything as in-your-face as #3. Sometimes it works very well.

I hope you enjoy whatever is written above. If not - well, I'm afraid that's life.
BlackWolfe Viewer Gender Confusion? from Lost in Austin Since: Jun, 2010
#44: Jan 19th 2011 at 5:48:37 PM

When I write a sex scene, I tend to focus on sensation and emotion more than anything else, because the mechanics of sex are dull and unsexy.

But soft! What rock through yonder window breaks? It is a brick! And Juliet is out cold.
drunkscriblerian Street Writing Man from Castle Geekhaven Since: Oct, 2010 Relationship Status: In season
Street Writing Man
#45: Jan 19th 2011 at 8:40:10 PM

[up]Agreed with this. When you get right down to it, the mechanics of sex don't change much from encounter to encounter. To quote a <female> friend of mine; "The faces change but the acts stay the same...there's some kissing, followed by some stripping, some groping, some licking, some sucking and then some fucking."

I'd say that's a good enough argument; focus on what makes it different, not what makes it the same.

If I were to write some of the strange things that come under my eyes they would not be believed. ~Cora M. Strayer~
ImipolexG frozen in time from all our yesterdays Since: Jan, 2001
frozen in time
#46: Jan 19th 2011 at 9:45:36 PM

I think the important thing is that it should convey how the characters feel about it, how it affects their relationship and (ultimately) the story as a whole.

no one will notice that I changed this
Alkthash Was? Since: Jan, 2001
Was?
#47: Jan 20th 2011 at 11:59:20 AM

"And what about the heroine? She is languidly reclining on the bed ... and doing her level best to not bust a gut laughing, I suspect. Should she stare? Gasp? Giggle? Ogle? Chant 'boingy, boingy, boingy' as he approaches or whistle the 'Elephant Walk' in time to the swaying?

You know I could actually picture a girl saying boingy boingy boingy if the guy is being a bit too serious about getting ready for sex. Fun teasing and gently reminding him they are trying to have fun.

feotakahari Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer from Looking out at the city Since: Sep, 2009
Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer
#48: Jan 20th 2011 at 11:52:15 PM

Focus on what makes it different, not what makes it the same.

This is why sci-fi has the best sex scenes.

That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful
TheProffesor The Professor from USA Since: Jan, 2011
#49: Jan 21st 2011 at 7:26:03 AM

I hate sex scenes. They kind of distract and sidetrack too much to be useful. I have no problem with love,but I avoid sex scenes.

doorhandle Gork Side 4 Life from Space Australia! Since: Oct, 2010

Total posts: 58
Top