Deleting the statement for its disregard of Xavin's canon characterization (He and Molly had an extended conversation about why his shapeshifting was normal to him as a Skrull alien and weird to her and the rest of the humans). Also, the phrasing comes across as ignoring the existence of genderfluid beings at best and condemning of genderfluid partners in relationships with gays at worst. Changing some of the phrasing would make the post look a lot more informed.
Removed from the discussion of Ultimate Captain America:
- It doesn't help that Cap is situated in modern day New York which is at the forefront of the ever-changing times, instead of say, a small farming community that would be closer to 1940s etiquette and values. Maybe having all their psychics killed and replaced by aliens included all their psychologists too.
Because (1) it's Conversation On The Main Page, (2) "small farming communities" in the 2010s aren't actually mired in the values of the 1940s and it's a little insulting to state as fact that they are, and (3) it seems to be implying that if they had competent psychologists to advise them, the government would have sent their ultimate supersoldier off to live on a farm instead of using him to actually do things.
This statement in itself reads as somewhat uncomfortable:
This statement basically infers Xavin is not a progressive character for being a shapeshifter, i.e., shifting back and forth between female and male identities. It goes further and ties into the idea that a genderqueer person is not an adequate partner for a full-fledged lesbian, which has all sorts of gross implications.
The comment seems to promote the idea a genderqueer individual is expected to consider her gay partner's feelings before her own when deciding on the matter of her personal identity, tying into the idea that gay people's feeling are more important/more relevant than anyone else's in the LGBTQ community. Maybe this could be revised?
Hide / Show Replies