Follow TV Tropes

Discussion Main / JitterCam

Go To

Aug 12th 2015 at 5:21:11 PM •••

I think effects are great — IF they improve the story or augment the mood. However, the overwhelming abuse of shaky/jittery cam, fast zoom, whip pans and other effects that supposedly add immediacy to the scene make me find something else to watch. There is no elegance or class to most film making any longer, especially on TV product.

I'm still trying to imagine the new camera operator, fresh out of film school and loaded with debt, learning that any fool with an iPhone can shoot the same scenes just as well.

Feb 10th 2011 at 12:36:46 AM •••

Does the audience really like jittercam / shakycam / "ugly radio"? I despise it. Someone should tell the producers / cameramen / directors / editors that audiences do not enjoy it. Perhaps we should make an effort to bail, and demand a refund, in any movie that exhibits "bad" camerawork. At least that would make a statement that the industry would understand... in the wallet.

Hide/Show Replies
Jan 6th 2012 at 5:02:12 PM •••

I like Jitter Cam.

So no thanks.

Edited by RaZorwire
Nov 27th 2013 at 7:40:16 PM •••

I f***ing hate it. With a burning passion. Ruined proper filmwork.

Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.

How well does it match the trope?

Example of:


Media sources: