Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Characters / MCUCitizensNewYorkCityMidtownSchoolOfScienceAndTechnology

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
PonchoBot Since: Feb, 2016
Feb 23rd 2022 at 8:08:03 PM •••

Since Peter was effectively kicked out of Midtown thanks to the memory spell, should his folder be moved down to the "Alumni" section?

StrangeThoughts Since: May, 2017
Jul 18th 2017 at 2:59:33 AM •••

The "species" stat was arbitrarily removed from several pages by dmcreif without any discussion whatsoever. Since uniformity is what we want on the pages, shall we restore the stat and tell dmcreif that his editing is harmful?

Hide / Show Replies
frederickzabala Since: Jul, 2013
Jul 3rd 2019 at 4:45:11 AM •••

Should Jason Ioenello should be added as a Current Student since he was apparently an Victim of the Snap along with Beth, Ned, MJ and Peter?? (Update: Never Mind someone edited it)

Edited by frederickzabala
Eagal This is a title. Since: Apr, 2012
This is a title.
Jul 20th 2017 at 8:23:47 AM •••

There is a problem with the case of Michelle's status as a Canon Character All Along.

I tried to keep it off the page, as Feige's comments on the matter say she's not an adaptation of Mary Jane at all, but others keep readding it and describing it as "An odd case", even though it's not a case at all. I tried to compromise and leave the trope in the list but listed as Averted, but it just got reverted to "An odd case" again.

So I brought it here to discuss how we should label the entry. Obviously, I'm in favor of keeping it listed as an aversion.

Edited by Eagal You fell victim to one of the classic blunders! Hide / Show Replies
AzureOwl Since: May, 2009
Jul 20th 2017 at 11:06:34 AM •••

I agree with you. Even within the context of the movie itself it is clear that Michelle is not Mary Jane, but a completely different character who fills the same function.

Canon Character All Along should be removed from her entry or turned into an Aversion.

Edited by AzureOwl
Owlorange1995 Since: Oct, 2016
Jul 20th 2017 at 2:05:45 PM •••

If it's an aversion, then it doesn't really count as Canon Character All Along. Should we just keep it off the page?

AzureOwl Since: May, 2009
Jul 20th 2017 at 3:47:14 PM •••

I would normally agree, but in this case so many people got the impression that she was supposed to be Mary Jane (even when she clearly isn't and that was confirmed by Word of God) that if the trope is not listed people will keep adding it.

Better to leave it as an Aversion, explaining why, than to have to come back every so often to remove it.

Eagal Since: Apr, 2012
Jul 20th 2017 at 4:17:22 PM •••

That was my thinking as well.

You fell victim to one of the classic blunders!
Top