I have an issue with the following edit: "As the acknowledged and legal Queen in the North (Robb Stark and Jon Snow are considered just rebels), she is also the successor of her ancestor King Torrhen". This has also been re-added upon its removal by the same troper who originally added this piece.
As far as I can see from the show, there is nothing pointing to the North viewing Jon and Robb as simply rebels (or by Westeros as a whole, particularly since Jon/Robb/Sansa's own brother Bran is king as of the finale).
My other issue is there was a 300 year gap and two chosen kings between Torrhen Stark, who bent the knee to Aegon the Conqueror, and Sansa Stark. I don't think Sansa would apply as Torrhen's successor as she did not inherit the crown from Torrhen or even from Robb or Jon (since Robb and Jon are chosen kings, not nobles who inherited the crown and as far as I can see, as Sansa just asked for independence, she likewise did not inherit QiTN either).
Hello,
I have an issue with the following edit
: "As the acknowledged and legal Queen in the North (Robb Stark and Jon Snow are considered just rebels), she is also the successor of her ancestor King Torrhen". This has also been re-added upon its removal by the same troper who originally added this piece
.
As far as I can see from the show, there is nothing pointing to the North viewing Jon and Robb as simply rebels (or by Westeros as a whole, particularly since Jon/Robb/Sansa's own brother Bran is king as of the finale).
My other issue is there was a 300 year gap and two chosen kings between Torrhen Stark, who bent the knee to Aegon the Conqueror, and Sansa Stark. I don't think Sansa would apply as Torrhen's successor as she did not inherit the crown from Torrhen or even from Robb or Jon (since Robb and Jon are chosen kings, not nobles who inherited the crown and as far as I can see, as Sansa just asked for independence, she likewise did not inherit QiTN either).
Thoughts?
Edited by cherrychels