[002]
Methuselah
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Did you even read my response about the \
to:
Did you even read my response about the \\\"Multiple Endings\\\"? No? Okay, just for you-
Also, while yes, \\\"Multiple Endings\\\" does refer to how the credits roll, that\\\'s not the only way the tropes is applied. Multiple Endings also refers to the state the world is left in after the Credits role.
So yeah, the information there wasn\\\'t false by any means. Sure, you can\\\'t get them to role in the credits, but those worldstates still count as endings. The only edit that was really necessary was to point out that the Alliance/Armistice worldstates have no affect upon the credits.
And this?- \\\"Nobody spent a month working on that entry, it was sporadically edited about 6 times total by different people who were casually adding information they heard without checking it properly. I was correcting false information. If they tried to make this page line up with that, without even checking the game or discussing it with other users to make sure, then that\\\'s their fault, not mine.\\\"
That\\\'s rude as all hell. Did you check with other users before you made YOUR edits? If you did, okay, yeah fine. Props to you. If you didn\\\'t, that makes you a hypocrite. I\\\'m not here to play the blame game, but you might need to take a look at your own advice.
BUT, even if you did, there\\\'s the matter that you should have posted the changes you though needed to be made here, on the Topic section, first, before making any edits, let other people give commentary. This is a community, not one-person archive. And I couldn\\\'t fine any topical discussion about this from before you made your edits.
That being said, I\\\'m not here bicker with you. I apologized for the name calling, and tried to leave you with a friendly warning.
If we\\\'re gonna have one of those year-spanning feudfests here in the topics section, feel free to fire away. But don\\\'t expect a response from me until tomorrow. I\\\'m not going to waste my study time for exams to fight over this. Instead, I\\\'m going to ignore the fact that you used italics in an attempt to antagonize me by suggesting that I was stupid, and hopefully you can simmer down and perhaps find some merit in my input. Good day, sir/miss/mizzer.
Also, while yes, \\\"Multiple Endings\\\" does refer to how the credits roll, that\\\'s not the only way the tropes is applied. Multiple Endings also refers to the state the world is left in after the Credits role.
So yeah, the information there wasn\\\'t false by any means. Sure, you can\\\'t get them to role in the credits, but those worldstates still count as endings. The only edit that was really necessary was to point out that the Alliance/Armistice worldstates have no affect upon the credits.
And this?- \\\"Nobody spent a month working on that entry, it was sporadically edited about 6 times total by different people who were casually adding information they heard without checking it properly. I was correcting false information. If they tried to make this page line up with that, without even checking the game or discussing it with other users to make sure, then that\\\'s their fault, not mine.\\\"
That\\\'s rude as all hell. Did you check with other users before you made YOUR edits? If you did, okay, yeah fine. Props to you. If you didn\\\'t, that makes you a hypocrite. I\\\'m not here to play the blame game, but you might need to take a look at your own advice.
BUT, even if you did, there\\\'s the matter that you should have posted the changes you though needed to be made here, on the Topic section, first, before making any edits, let other people give commentary. This is a community, not one-person archive. And I couldn\\\'t fine any topical discussion about this from before you made your edits.
That being said, I\\\'m not here bicker with you. I apologized for the name calling, and tried to leave you with a friendly warning.
If we\\\'re gonna have one of those year-spanning feudfests here in the topics section, feel free to fire away. But don\\\'t expect a response from me until tomorrow. I\\\'m not going to waste my study time for exams to fight over this. Instead, I\\\'m going to ignore the fact that you used italics in an attempt to antagonize me by suggesting that I was stupid, and hopefully you can simmer down and perhaps find some merit in my input. Good day, sir/miss/mizzer.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Did even read my response about the \
to:
Did you even read my response about the \\\"Multiple Endings\\\"? No? Okay, just for you-
Also, while yes, \\\"Multiple Endings\\\" does refer to how the credits roll, that\\\'s not the only way the tropes is applied. Multiple Endings also refers to the state the world is left in after the Credits role.
So yeah, the information there wasn\\\'t false by any means. Sure, you can\\\'t get them to role in the credits, but those worldstates still count as endings. The only edit that was really necessary was to point out that the Alliance/Armistice worldstates have no affect upon the credits.
And this?- \\\"Nobody spent a month working on that entry, it was sporadically edited about 6 times total by different people who were casually adding information they heard without checking it properly. I was correcting false information. If they tried to make this page line up with that, without even checking the game or discussing it with other users to make sure, then that\\\'s their fault, not mine.\\\"
That\\\'s rude as all hell. Did you check with other users before you made YOUR edits? If you did, okay, yeah fine. Props to you. If you didn\\\'t, that makes you a hypocrite.
BUT, even if you did, there\\\'s the matter that you should have posted the changes you though needed to be made here, on the Topic section, first, before making any edits, let other people give commentary. This is a community, not one-person archive. And I couldn\\\'t fine any topical discussion about this from before you made your edits.
That being said, I\\\'m not here bicker with you. I apologized for the name calling, and tried to leave you with a friendly warning. I\\\'m not here to play the blame game, but you might need to take a look at your own advice.
If we\\\'re gonna have one of those year-spanning feudfests here in the topics section, feel free to fire away. But don\\\'t expect a response from me until tomorrow. I\\\'m not going to waste my study time for exams to fight over this. Instead, I\\\'m going to ignore the fact that you used italics in an attempt to antagonize me by suggesting that I was stupid, and hopefully you can simmer down and perhaps find some merit in my input. Good day, sir/miss/mizzer.
Also, while yes, \\\"Multiple Endings\\\" does refer to how the credits roll, that\\\'s not the only way the tropes is applied. Multiple Endings also refers to the state the world is left in after the Credits role.
So yeah, the information there wasn\\\'t false by any means. Sure, you can\\\'t get them to role in the credits, but those worldstates still count as endings. The only edit that was really necessary was to point out that the Alliance/Armistice worldstates have no affect upon the credits.
And this?- \\\"Nobody spent a month working on that entry, it was sporadically edited about 6 times total by different people who were casually adding information they heard without checking it properly. I was correcting false information. If they tried to make this page line up with that, without even checking the game or discussing it with other users to make sure, then that\\\'s their fault, not mine.\\\"
That\\\'s rude as all hell. Did you check with other users before you made YOUR edits? If you did, okay, yeah fine. Props to you. If you didn\\\'t, that makes you a hypocrite.
BUT, even if you did, there\\\'s the matter that you should have posted the changes you though needed to be made here, on the Topic section, first, before making any edits, let other people give commentary. This is a community, not one-person archive. And I couldn\\\'t fine any topical discussion about this from before you made your edits.
That being said, I\\\'m not here bicker with you. I apologized for the name calling, and tried to leave you with a friendly warning. I\\\'m not here to play the blame game, but you might need to take a look at your own advice.
If we\\\'re gonna have one of those year-spanning feudfests here in the topics section, feel free to fire away. But don\\\'t expect a response from me until tomorrow. I\\\'m not going to waste my study time for exams to fight over this. Instead, I\\\'m going to ignore the fact that you used italics in an attempt to antagonize me by suggesting that I was stupid, and hopefully you can simmer down and perhaps find some merit in my input. Good day, sir/miss/mizzer.
