[004]
imadmagician
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
To Magbas: yes, it would seem so. However, if we were to apply \
to:
To Magbas: yes, it would seem so. However, if we were to apply \\\"real life standards\\\" to it, or at the very least a tad of reason and common sense, wouldn\\\'t that seem a strawman / FalseDichotomy of some sort? (Being either a complete monster or someone who would never resort to murder no matter the intentions and circumstances) In other words, it would seem to me the story is being Anvilicious in a bad way with that ideology.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
To Magbas: yes, it would seem so. However, if we were to apply \
to:
To Magbas: yes, it would seem so. However, if we were to apply \\\"real life standards\\\" to it, or at the very least a tad of reason and common sense, wouldn\\\'t that seem a strawman / FalseDichotomy of some sort? (Being either a complete monster or someone who would never resort to murder) In other words, it would seem to me the story is being Anvilicious in a bad way with that ideology.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
To MagBas: yes, it would seem so. However, if we were to apply \
to:
To Magbas: yes, it would seem so. However, if we were to apply \\\"real life standards\\\" to it, or at the very least a tad of reason and common sense, wouldn\\\'t that seem a strawman / false dichotomy of some sort? (Being either a complete monster or someone who would never resort to murder)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
To Magbas: yes, it would seem so. However, if we were to apply \
to:
To MagBas: yes, it would seem so. However, if we were to apply \\\"real life standards\\\" to it, or at the very least a tad of reason and common sense, wouldn\\\'t that seem a strawman / false dichotomy of some sort? (Being either a complete monster or someone who would never resort to murder)
