[001]
169.233.250.53
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I admit that I have a bias when it comes to this entry, but I think there are some site rules/general cohesiveness attempts that make this entry particularly not good to have at the moment:
*\
*\
to:
I admit that I have a bias when it comes to this sub-bullet, but I think there are some site rules/general cohesiveness attempts that make it particularly not good to have at the moment:
*\\\"...you may not use our site to carry out an argument that is going on somewhere else. If the Internet is in an uproar about something, we don\\\'t need to tell everyone about it. We most certainly don\\\'t want to appear to take someone\\\'s side of an argument...\\\"
*The Scandalgate entry on Goobergrape is no longer there, so linking to that article is rather pointless
*Not checking out the link for the sake of my computer, but the bullet links to ED as evidence and says the link is NSFW. That might be a reference to the advertising on ED--does the forum rule on not linking to sites with explicit advertising apply to the main wiki?
*I don\\\'t really see anything positive coming of trying to revise this bullet, its presence makes the discussion of Goobergrape on TV Tropes seem acceptable when editors on Scandalgate have stated \\\"G****gate is a banned issue on this site.\\\"
I\\\'m also censoring the name of the whenever possible so as to reduce its searchability on the wiki, so sorry if that\\\'s confusing.
*\\\"...you may not use our site to carry out an argument that is going on somewhere else. If the Internet is in an uproar about something, we don\\\'t need to tell everyone about it. We most certainly don\\\'t want to appear to take someone\\\'s side of an argument...\\\"
*The Scandalgate entry on Goobergrape is no longer there, so linking to that article is rather pointless
*Not checking out the link for the sake of my computer, but the bullet links to ED as evidence and says the link is NSFW. That might be a reference to the advertising on ED--does the forum rule on not linking to sites with explicit advertising apply to the main wiki?
*I don\\\'t really see anything positive coming of trying to revise this bullet, its presence makes the discussion of Goobergrape on TV Tropes seem acceptable when editors on Scandalgate have stated \\\"G****gate is a banned issue on this site.\\\"
I\\\'m also censoring the name of the whenever possible so as to reduce its searchability on the wiki, so sorry if that\\\'s confusing.
