[002]
Larkmarn
Current Version
Changed line(s) 15 from:
n
The thing is, Flanderization isn\'t YMMV, and the cutter\'s reasoning was flawed... Flanderization is taking a relatively small aspect of a character\'s personality and turning it into a larger part. Which happens here for most of these characters. It\'s not \
to:
The thing is, Flanderization isn\\\'t YMMV, and the cutter\\\'s reasoning was flawed... Flanderization is taking a relatively small aspect of a character\\\'s personality and turning it into a larger part. Which happens here for most of these characters. It\\\'s not \\\"simplifying\\\" them, as they said. The edited version basically treats it as a YMMV item, which is incorrect. Not to mention a ZCE.
Though I do take issue with Elizabeth\\\'s entry. The way it\\\'s worded, it seems more like a general shift in her personality, rather than a smaller aspect becoming larger. Also the examples could stand to be cleaned up. People adding to them haphazardly has made them really feel all over the place, like it was done by a bunch of people, rather than one unified voice.
EDIT: mlsmithca changed the entry (for the better), but it still lacked actual context and still treated it like an AudienceReaction.
Though I do take issue with Elizabeth\\\'s entry. The way it\\\'s worded, it seems more like a general shift in her personality, rather than a smaller aspect becoming larger. Also the examples could stand to be cleaned up. People adding to them haphazardly has made them really feel all over the place, like it was done by a bunch of people, rather than one unified voice.
EDIT: mlsmithca changed the entry (for the better), but it still lacked actual context and still treated it like an AudienceReaction.
Changed line(s) 15 from:
n
The thing is, Flanderization isn\'t YMMV, and the cutter\'s reasoning was flawed... Flanderization is taking a relatively small aspect of a character\'s personality and turning it into a larger part. Which happens here for most of these characters. It\'s not \
to:
The thing is, Flanderization isn\\\'t YMMV, and the cutter\\\'s reasoning was flawed... Flanderization is taking a relatively small aspect of a character\\\'s personality and turning it into a larger part. Which happens here for most of these characters. It\\\'s not \\\"simplifying\\\" them, as they said. The edited version basically treats it as a YMMV item, which is incorrect. Not to mention a ZCE.
Though I do take issue with Elizabeth\\\'s entry. The way it\\\'s worded, it seems more like a general shift in her personality, rather than a smaller aspect becoming larger.
EDIT: mlsmithca changed the entry (for the better), but it still lacked actual context and still treated it like an AudienceReaction.
Though I do take issue with Elizabeth\\\'s entry. The way it\\\'s worded, it seems more like a general shift in her personality, rather than a smaller aspect becoming larger.
EDIT: mlsmithca changed the entry (for the better), but it still lacked actual context and still treated it like an AudienceReaction.
