[013]
2.101.102.181
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It would appear my edit reason has been misread. I did not say Blake was not going to be HeroicSelfDeprecation, I said stuffing one, single occurrence into that particular trope was premature. I also noted that the kids are still in an unproven trainee status - they\'re not heroes yet; they\'re still only at the start of the journey and currently questioning why they want to become the heroes of the future. All I said was that assigning the trope, right now, is premature.
to:
It would appear my edit reason has been misread. I did not say Blake was not going to be HeroicSelfDeprecation, I said stuffing one, single occurrence into that trope was premature. I also noted that the kids are still in an unproven trainee status - they\\\'re not heroes yet; they\\\'re still only at the start of the journey and currently questioning why they want to become the heroes of the future. All I said was that assigning the trope, right now, is premature.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It would appear my edit reason has been misread. I did not say Blake was not going to be HeroicSelfDeprecation, I said stuffing one, single occurrence into that trope was premature. I also noted that the kids are still in an unproven trainee status - they\'re not heroes yet; they\'re still only at the start of the journey and currently questioning why they want to become the heroes of the future. All I said was that assigning the trope, right now, is premature.
to:
It would appear my edit reason has been misread. I did not say Blake was not going to be HeroicSelfDeprecation, I said stuffing one, single occurrence into that particular trope was premature. I also noted that the kids are still in an unproven trainee status - they\\\'re not heroes yet; they\\\'re still only at the start of the journey and currently questioning why they want to become the heroes of the future. All I said was that assigning the trope, right now, is premature.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Perhaps I should have commented it out instead of taking it off the page, but it appears my edit reason has been misunderstood.
to:
Perhaps I should have commented it out instead of taking it off the page.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It would appear my edit reason has been misunderstood. I did not say Blake was not going to be HeroicSelfDeprecation, I said stuffing one, single occurrence into that trope was premature. I also noted that the kids are still in an unproven trainee status - they\'re not heroes yet; they\'re still only at the start of the journey and currently questioning why they want to become the heroes of the future. All I said was that assigning the trope, right now, is premature.
to:
It would appear my edit reason has been misread. I did not say Blake was not going to be HeroicSelfDeprecation, I said stuffing one, single occurrence into that trope was premature. I also noted that the kids are still in an unproven trainee status - they\\\'re not heroes yet; they\\\'re still only at the start of the journey and currently questioning why they want to become the heroes of the future. All I said was that assigning the trope, right now, is premature.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It would appear my edit reason has been misunderstood. I did not say Blake was not going to be HeroicSelfDeprecation, I said stuffing one, single occurrence into that trope was premature. I also observed that the kids are still in an unproven trainee status - they\'re not heroes yet; they\'re still only at the start of the journey and currently questioning why they want to become the heroes of the future. All I said was that assigning the trope, right now, is premature.
to:
It would appear my edit reason has been misunderstood. I did not say Blake was not going to be HeroicSelfDeprecation, I said stuffing one, single occurrence into that trope was premature. I also noted that the kids are still in an unproven trainee status - they\\\'re not heroes yet; they\\\'re still only at the start of the journey and currently questioning why they want to become the heroes of the future. All I said was that assigning the trope, right now, is premature.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It would appear my edit reason has been misunderstood. I did not say it was not going to be HeroicSelfDeprecation, I said stuffing one, single occurrence into that trope was premature. I also observed that the kids are still in an unproven trainee status - they\'re not heroes yet; they\'re still only at the start of the journey and currently questioning why they want to become the heroes of the future. All I said was that assigning the trope, right now, is premature.
to:
It would appear my edit reason has been misunderstood. I did not say Blake was not going to be HeroicSelfDeprecation, I said stuffing one, single occurrence into that trope was premature. I also observed that the kids are still in an unproven trainee status - they\\\'re not heroes yet; they\\\'re still only at the start of the journey and currently questioning why they want to become the heroes of the future. All I said was that assigning the trope, right now, is premature.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It would appear Laughing Fist has not read my editing reason correctly. I did not say it was not going to be HeroicSelfDeprecation, I said stuffing one, single occurrence into that trope was premature. I also observed that the kids are still in an unproven trainee status - they\'re not heroes yet; they\'re still only at the start of the journey and currently questioning why they want to become the heroes of the future. All I said was that assigning the trope, right now, is premature.
to:
It would appear my edit reason has been misunderstood. I did not say it was not going to be HeroicSelfDeprecation, I said stuffing one, single occurrence into that trope was premature. I also observed that the kids are still in an unproven trainee status - they\\\'re not heroes yet; they\\\'re still only at the start of the journey and currently questioning why they want to become the heroes of the future. All I said was that assigning the trope, right now, is premature.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Perhaps I should have commented it out, but it appears my edit reason has been misunderstood.
to:
Perhaps I should have commented it out instead of taking it off the page, but it appears my edit reason has been misunderstood.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
There really is no need to jump on something as soon as it\'s released and attempt to stuff it into a trope as fast as possible. Sometimes it\'s worth waiting a little while and see where characters and the story go before deciding if there really is a trope going on and which trope it is - especially if it\'s part of a situation that\'s still unfolding.
to:
There really is no need to jump on something as soon as it\\\'s released and attempt to stuff it into a trope as fast as possible. Sometimes it\\\'s worth waiting a little while and see where characters and the story go before deciding if there really is a trope going on and which trope it is - especially if it\\\'s part of a situation that\\\'s still unfolding.
Perhaps I should have commented it out, but it appears my edit reason has been misunderstood.
Perhaps I should have commented it out, but it appears my edit reason has been misunderstood.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I also did not say this event was an example of YouAreBetterThanYouThinkYouAre. What I said was that, for all we know, it might turn out to be that trope instead. It\'s not like the situation that led to her comments has ended yet, it\'s clearly designed to cover at least a few episodes.
to:
I also did not say this event was an example of YouAreBetterThanYouThinkYouAre. I said that, for all we know, it might end up being that instead. It could even be something else in the end. It\\\'s not like the situation that led to her comments has ended yet, it\\\'s clearly designed to cover at least a few episodes.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It would appear Laughing Fist has not read my editing reason correctly. I did not say it was not going to be HeroicSelfDeprecation, I said stuffing a single occurrence into that trope was premature. I also observed that the kids are still in an unproven trainee status - they\'re not heroes yet; they\'re still only at the start of the journey and currently questioning why they want to become the heroes of the future. All I said was that assigning the trope, right now, is premature.
to:
It would appear Laughing Fist has not read my editing reason correctly. I did not say it was not going to be HeroicSelfDeprecation, I said stuffing one, single occurrence into that trope was premature. I also observed that the kids are still in an unproven trainee status - they\\\'re not heroes yet; they\\\'re still only at the start of the journey and currently questioning why they want to become the heroes of the future. All I said was that assigning the trope, right now, is premature.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I also did not say this event was an example of YouAreBetterThanYouThinkYouAre. What I said was that, for all we know, it might turn out to be that trope instead. It\'s not like the situation that led to her comments has ended yet. The scene is still unfolding and is clearly designed to cover at least a few episodes.
to:
I also did not say this event was an example of YouAreBetterThanYouThinkYouAre. What I said was that, for all we know, it might turn out to be that trope instead. It\\\'s not like the situation that led to her comments has ended yet, it\\\'s clearly designed to cover at least a few episodes.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It would appear Laughing Fist has not read my editing reason correctly. I did not say it was not going to be HeroicSelfDeprecation, I said that a one single example of Blake questioning her worth during a period when the story has made it clear these kids are unproven trainees who are still trying to understand why they want to be heroes (and therefore are not established heroes yet) is a case of premature troping.
to:
It would appear Laughing Fist has not read my editing reason correctly. I did not say it was not going to be HeroicSelfDeprecation, I said stuffing a single occurrence into that trope was premature. I also observed that the kids are still in an unproven trainee status - they\\\'re not heroes yet; they\\\'re still only at the start of the journey and currently questioning why they want to become the heroes of the future. All I said was that assigning the trope, right now, is premature.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I also did not say this event was an example of YouAreBetterThanYouThinkYouAre. I said that, for all we know, given it\'s only a single occurrance during a situation that is in an on-going status, it might end up being an example of that trope for all we know.
to:
I also did not say this event was an example of YouAreBetterThanYouThinkYouAre. What I said was that, for all we know, it might turn out to be that trope instead. It\\\'s not like the situation that led to her comments has ended yet. The scene is still unfolding and is clearly designed to cover at least a few episodes.
