[004]
71.14.32.110
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Fable 2, someone should mention it. You fight through armies to get at the guy who has the ultimate power, only to defeat him with a -music box-. He gives a big speech that is cut off by either you or the Chaotic Evil NPC follower with a single shot from even the weakest or guns, or even crossbow.
to:
Fable 2, someone should mention it. You fight through armies to get at the guy who has the ultimate power, only to defeat him with a -music box-. He then gives a big speech that is cut off by either you or the Chaotic Evil NPC follower with a single shot from even the weakest of guns, or even crossbow.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
What I largely object to in the philosophy of Objectivism is the seeming unackqwledged hypocrisy of how it\'s modern followers seem to engage in revising it\'s philosophy... when Ayn Rand herself \'\'objected\'\' to that. StudiodeKadent, you\'ve acknowledged some of the flaws in Rand\'s logic on the discussion page here, and, to their credit, the Atlas Society does so as well, in articles like this one: http://www.objectivistcenter.org/cth-32-2298-DementiaQA.aspx. But, while others (yes, including subjective me) have described the flaws of Rand\'s philosophy using inflammatory language on the main wiki, until now, you\'ve not simply removed inflammatory language, you\'ve removed \'\'all mention\'\' of the flaw, and have continued to downplay them; it is nearly impossible to talk, or learn, about Objectivism itself without mentioning that Rand based it on her own admittedly flawed worldview. The problem is, Rand herself believed she had no flaws. This, admittedly, bothers many modern Objectivists, so they modify her theories, which may be all for the best, but people need to know about Objectvism as Rand first conceived it, warts and all, in order to understand how modern Objectvists have modified her theories to fit a more inclusive perception of the world. These post-modern modifications need to be acknowledged, detailed, and catalogued as well, otherwise it appears to the average subjective layman as though Objectivists are moving the goalposts http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts in order to create a \
to:
What I largely object to in the philosophy of Objectivism is the seeming unackqwledged hypocrisy of how it\\\'s modern followers seem to engage in revising it\\\'s philosophy... when Ayn Rand herself \\\'\\\'objected\\\'\\\' to that. StudiodeKadent, you\\\'ve acknowledged some of the flaws in Rand\\\'s logic on the discussion page here, and, to their credit, the Atlas Society does so as well, in articles like this one: http://www.objectivistcenter.org/cth-32-2298-DementiaQA.aspx. But, while others (yes, including subjective me) have described the flaws of Rand\\\'s philosophy using inflammatory language on the main wiki, until now, you\\\'ve not simply removed inflammatory language, you\\\'ve removed \\\'\\\'all mention\\\'\\\' of the flaw, and have continued to downplay them; it is nearly impossible to talk, or learn, about Objectivism itself without mentioning that Rand based it on her own admittedly flawed worldview. The problem is, Rand herself believed she had no flaws. This, admittedly, bothers many modern Objectivists, so they modify her theories, which may be all for the best, but people need to know about Objectvism as Rand first conceived it, warts and all, in order to understand how modern Objectvists have modified her theories, a la Martin Luther, to fit a more inclusive perception of the world. These post-modern modifications need to be acknowledged, detailed, and catalogued as well, otherwise it appears to the average subjective layman as though Objectivists are moving the goalposts http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts in order to create a \\\"Book of Brady\\\", http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/InheritTheWind as it were.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
What I largely object to in the philosophy of Objectivism is the seeming hypocrisy of how it\'s modern followers seem to engage in revising it\'s philosophy... when Ayn Rand herself \'\'objected\'\' to that. StudiodeKadent, you\'ve acknowledged some of the flaws in Rand\'s logic on the discussion page here, and, to their credit, the Atlas Society does so as well, in articles like this one: http://www.objectivistcenter.org/cth-32-2298-DementiaQA.aspx. But, while others (yes, including subjective me) have described the flaws of Rand\'s philosophy using inflammatory language on the main wiki, until now, you\'ve not simply removed inflammatory language, you\'ve removed \'\'all mention\'\' of the flaw, and have continued to downplay them; it is nearly impossible to talk, or learn, about Objectivism itself without mentioning that Rand based it on her own admittedly flawed worldview. The problem is, Rand herself believed she had no flaws. This, admittedly, bothers many modern Objectivists, so they modify her theories, which may be all for the best, but people need to know about Objectvism as Rand first conceived it, warts and all, in order to understand how modern Objectvists have modified her theories to fit a more inclusive perception of the world. These post-modern modifications need to be acknowledged, detailed, and catalogued as well, otherwise it appears to the average subjective layman as though Objectivists are moving the goalposts http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts in order to create a \
to:
What I largely object to in the philosophy of Objectivism is the seeming unackqwledged hypocrisy of how it\\\'s modern followers seem to engage in revising it\\\'s philosophy... when Ayn Rand herself \\\'\\\'objected\\\'\\\' to that. StudiodeKadent, you\\\'ve acknowledged some of the flaws in Rand\\\'s logic on the discussion page here, and, to their credit, the Atlas Society does so as well, in articles like this one: http://www.objectivistcenter.org/cth-32-2298-DementiaQA.aspx. But, while others (yes, including subjective me) have described the flaws of Rand\\\'s philosophy using inflammatory language on the main wiki, until now, you\\\'ve not simply removed inflammatory language, you\\\'ve removed \\\'\\\'all mention\\\'\\\' of the flaw, and have continued to downplay them; it is nearly impossible to talk, or learn, about Objectivism itself without mentioning that Rand based it on her own admittedly flawed worldview. The problem is, Rand herself believed she had no flaws. This, admittedly, bothers many modern Objectivists, so they modify her theories, which may be all for the best, but people need to know about Objectvism as Rand first conceived it, warts and all, in order to understand how modern Objectvists have modified her theories to fit a more inclusive perception of the world. These post-modern modifications need to be acknowledged, detailed, and catalogued as well, otherwise it appears to the average subjective layman as though Objectivists are moving the goalposts http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts in order to create a \\\"Book of Brady\\\", http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/InheritTheWind as it were.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
What I largely object to in the philosophy of Objectivism is how it\'s modern followers seem to engage in revising it\'s philosophy... when Ayn Rand herself \'\'objected\'\' to that. StudiodeKadent, you\'ve acknowledged some of the flaws in Rand\'s logic on the discussion page here, and, to their credit, the Atlas Society does so as well, in articles like this one: http://www.objectivistcenter.org/cth-32-2298-DementiaQA.aspx. But, while others (yes, including subjective me) have described the flaws of Rand\'s philosophy using inflammatory language, until now, you\'ve not simply removed inflammatory language, you\'ve removed \'\'all mention\'\' of the flaw. And it is nearly impossible to talk, or learn, about Objectivism itself without mentioning that Rand based it on her own admittedly flawed worldview. The problem is, Rand herself believed she had no flaws. This, admittedly, bothers many modern Objectivists, so they modify her theories, which may be all for the best, but people need to know about Objectvism as Rand first conceived it, warts and all, in order to understand how modern Objectvists have modified her theories to fit a more inclusive perception of the world. These post-modern modifications need to be acknowledged, detailed, and catalogued as well, otherwise it appears to the average subjective layman as though Objectivists are [[moving the goalposts {{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts}}]] in order to create a \
to:
What I largely object to in the philosophy of Objectivism is the seeming hypocrisy of how it\\\'s modern followers seem to engage in revising it\\\'s philosophy... when Ayn Rand herself \\\'\\\'objected\\\'\\\' to that. StudiodeKadent, you\\\'ve acknowledged some of the flaws in Rand\\\'s logic on the discussion page here, and, to their credit, the Atlas Society does so as well, in articles like this one: http://www.objectivistcenter.org/cth-32-2298-DementiaQA.aspx. But, while others (yes, including subjective me) have described the flaws of Rand\\\'s philosophy using inflammatory language on the main wiki, until now, you\\\'ve not simply removed inflammatory language, you\\\'ve removed \\\'\\\'all mention\\\'\\\' of the flaw, and have continued to downplay them; it is nearly impossible to talk, or learn, about Objectivism itself without mentioning that Rand based it on her own admittedly flawed worldview. The problem is, Rand herself believed she had no flaws. This, admittedly, bothers many modern Objectivists, so they modify her theories, which may be all for the best, but people need to know about Objectvism as Rand first conceived it, warts and all, in order to understand how modern Objectvists have modified her theories to fit a more inclusive perception of the world. These post-modern modifications need to be acknowledged, detailed, and catalogued as well, otherwise it appears to the average subjective layman as though Objectivists are moving the goalposts http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts in order to create a \\\"Book of Brady\\\", http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/InheritTheWind as it were.
