Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Franchise / FireEmblem

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I think the trope description is a little too much. It pretty much drops describing the trope and simply hops right onto the negative aspects. It\'s not that those aspects may not be true (I\'m not doing the research right now, just looking at this trope description as a visitor to the trope page would do), but this description spends 80% of its time assuming the reader knows what is being talked about and talking about how bad the history is instead of explaining the trope. Evidently the writer felt very strongly about this, but I think those feelings are coloring the description too much.
to:
I think the trope description is a little too much. It pretty much drops describing the trope and simply hops right onto the negative aspects. It\\\'s not that those aspects may not be true (I\\\'m not doing the research right now, just looking at this trope description as a visitor to the trope page would do), but this description spends 80% of its time assuming the reader knows what is being talked about and talking about how bad the history is instead of explaining the trope. Evidently the writer felt very strongly about this - which is fine - but I think those feelings are coloring the description too much.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I think the trope description is a little too much. It pretty much drops describing the trope and simply hops right onto the negative aspects. It\'s not that those aspects may not be true (I\'m not doing the research right now, just looking at this trope description as a visitor to the trope page would do), but this description spends 80% of its time assuming the reader knows what is being talked about and talking about how bad it is instead of explaining the trope. Evidently the writer felt very strongly about this, but I think those feelings are coloring the description too much.
to:
I think the trope description is a little too much. It pretty much drops describing the trope and simply hops right onto the negative aspects. It\\\'s not that those aspects may not be true (I\\\'m not doing the research right now, just looking at this trope description as a visitor to the trope page would do), but this description spends 80% of its time assuming the reader knows what is being talked about and talking about how bad the history is instead of explaining the trope. Evidently the writer felt very strongly about this, but I think those feelings are coloring the description too much.
Top