[001]
96.255.225.223
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
:: Holy hell, are you joking me? The category system should have kept the old grading method. A lot of these games are not in any way \
to:
:: Holy hell, are you joking me? The category system should have kept the old grading method. A lot of these games are not in any way \\\"simulationist\\\" at all. The previous grading scale made much more sense than arbitrarily throwing games that looked similar into the same page. Ugh.
Given the amount of effort said troper put into resorting the page, I think it behooves those of us who supported the TRS consensus to be willing to reopen the discussion and allow @/EKonoMai input over the final form, but I also believe that no one person, however passionate, should have the right to unilaterally overturn a TRS-thread decision -- even one with as weak a consensus as this one had.
Edit: It must be noted, however, that no note indicating the existence of a TRS discussion was placed on the page after the redefinition; if errors were made, that was the first one.
Given the amount of effort said troper put into resorting the page, I think it behooves those of us who supported the TRS consensus to be willing to reopen the discussion and allow @/EKonoMai input over the final form, but I also believe that no one person, however passionate, should have the right to unilaterally overturn a TRS-thread decision -- even one with as weak a consensus as this one had.
Edit: It must be noted, however, that no note indicating the existence of a TRS discussion was placed on the page after the redefinition; if errors were made, that was the first one.
