[010]
148.85.235.219
Current Version
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
* There\'s a reason why \'\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\'\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes, a 4.4 on IMDb (same rating as \'\'{{WesternAnimation/Delgo}}\'\'), and a Metacritic score of 18. Richard Roeper has called the film \
to:
* There\\\'s a reason why \\\'\\\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\\\'\\\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\\\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes, a 4.4 on IMDb (same rating as \\\'\\\'{{WesternAnimation/Delgo}}\\\'\\\'), and a Metacritic score of 18. Richard Roeper has called the film \\\"the \\\'\\\'Film/CitizenKane\\\'\\\' of awful movies\\\" and it is currently on [[http://www.mrqe.com/lists/50_worst_movies the MRQE\\\'s list of the 50 worst movies ever.]] Now you know why this movie is hands-down one of the biggest atrocities in recent cinema history, relax and watch MarkKermode [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi7ypKqXhb4 tear this film a new one.]] While you\\\'re at it, check out the reviews from {{WebVideo/Spill}} [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFqOzQJ9fY0 here]] and [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0glHGainuKI here]]
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and [=John McEnroe=] are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in \\\'\\\'every category\\\'\\\' of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his opinion [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and [=John McEnroe=] are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in \\\'\\\'every category\\\'\\\' of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his opinion [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
* There\'s a reason why \'\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\'\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes, a 4.4 on IMDb (same rating as \'\'{{WesternAnimation/Delgo}}\'\'), and a Metacritic score of 18. Richard Roeper has called the film \
to:
* There\\\'s a reason why \\\'\\\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\\\'\\\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\\\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes, a 4.4 on IMDb (same rating as \\\'\\\'{{WesternAnimation/Delgo}}\\\'\\\'), and a Metacritic score of 18. Richard Roeper has called the film \\\"the \\\'\\\'Film/CitizenKane\\\'\\\' of awful movies\\\" and it is currently on [[http://www.mrqe.com/lists/50_worst_movies the MRQE\\\'s list of the 50 worst movies ever.]] Now you know why this movie is hands-down one of the biggest atrocities in recent cinema history, relax and watch MarkKermode [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi7ypKqXhb4 tear this film a new one.]]
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and [=John McEnroe=] are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in \\\'\\\'every category\\\'\\\' of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his opinion [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and [=John McEnroe=] are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in \\\'\\\'every category\\\'\\\' of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his opinion [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
* There\'s a reason why \'\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\'\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes, a 4.4 on IMDb (same rating as \'\'{{WesternAnimation/Delgo}}\'\'), Metacritic score of 18 and a user score of 2.8. Richard Roeper has called the film \
to:
* There\\\'s a reason why \\\'\\\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\\\'\\\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\\\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes, a 4.4 on IMDb (same rating as \\\'\\\'{{WesternAnimation/Delgo}}\\\'\\\'), and a Metacritic score of 18. Richard Roeper has called the film \\\"the \\\'\\\'Film/CitizenKane\\\'\\\' of awful movies\\\" and it is currently on [[http://www.mrqe.com/lists/50_worst_movies the MRQE\\\'s list of the 50 worst movies ever.]] Now you know why this movie is hands-down one of the biggest atrocities in recent cinema history, relax and watch MarkKermode [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi7ypKqXhb4 tear this film a new one.]]
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and [=John McEnroe=] are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in \\\'\\\'every category\\\'\\\' of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his views [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and [=John McEnroe=] are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in \\\'\\\'every category\\\'\\\' of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his views [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
* There\'s a reason why \'\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\'\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes and a Metacritic User Score of 2.8. Richard Roeper has called the film \
to:
* There\\\'s a reason why \\\'\\\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\\\'\\\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\\\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes, a 4.4 on IMDb (same rating as \\\'\\\'{{WesternAnimation/Delgo}}\\\'\\\'), Metacritic score of 18 and a user score of 2.8. Richard Roeper has called the film \\\"the \\\'\\\'Film/CitizenKane\\\'\\\' of awful movies\\\" and it is currently on [[http://www.mrqe.com/lists/50_worst_movies the MRQE\\\'s list of the 50 worst movies ever.]] Now you know why this movie is hands-down one of the biggest atrocities in recent cinema history, relax and watch MarkKermode [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi7ypKqXhb4 tear this film a new one.]]
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and [=John McEnroe=] are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in \\\'\\\'every category\\\'\\\' of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his views [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and [=John McEnroe=] are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in \\\'\\\'every category\\\'\\\' of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his views [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
* There\'s a reason why \'\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\'\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes and a Metacritic User Score of 2.8. Richard Roeper has called the film \
to:
* There\\\'s a reason why \\\'\\\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\\\'\\\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\\\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes and a Metacritic User Score of 2.8. Richard Roeper has called the film \\\"the \\\'\\\'Film/CitizenKane\\\'\\\' of awful movies\\\" and it is currently on [[http://www.mrqe.com/lists/50_worst_movies the MRQE\\\'s list of the 50 worst movies ever.]] Now you know why this movie is hands-down one of the biggest atrocities in recent cinema history, relax and watch MarkKermode [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi7ypKqXhb4 tear this film a new one.]]
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and [=John McEnroe=] are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in \\\'\\\'every category\\\'\\\' of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his views [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and [=John McEnroe=] are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in \\\'\\\'every category\\\'\\\' of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his views [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
* There\'s a reason why \'\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\'\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes and a Metacritic User Score of 2.8. Richard Roeper has called the film \
to:
* There\\\'s a reason why \\\'\\\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\\\'\\\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\\\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes and a Metacritic User Score of 2.8. Richard Roeper has called the film \\\"the \\\'\\\'Film/CitizenKane\\\'\\\' of awful movies\\\" and is currently on [[http://www.mrqe.com/lists/50_worst_movies the MRQE\\\'s list of the 50 worst movies ever.]] Now you know why this movie is hands-down one of the biggest atrocities in recent cinema history, relax and watch MarkKermode [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi7ypKqXhb4 tear this film a new one.]]
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and [=John McEnroe=] are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in \\\'\\\'every category\\\'\\\' of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his views [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and [=John McEnroe=] are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in \\\'\\\'every category\\\'\\\' of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his views [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
* There\'s a reason why \'\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\'\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes and a Metacritic User Score of 2.8. Richard Roeper has called the film \
to:
* There\\\'s a reason why \\\'\\\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\\\'\\\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\\\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes and a Metacritic User Score of 2.8. Richard Roeper has called the film \\\"the \\\'\\\'Film/CitizenKane\\\'\\\' of awful movies and is currently on [[http://www.mrqe.com/lists/50_worst_movies the MRQE\\\'s list of the 50 worst movies ever.]] Now you know why this movie is hands-down one of the biggest atrocities in recent cinema history, relax and watch MarkKermode [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi7ypKqXhb4 tear this film a new one.]]
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and [=John McEnroe=] are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in \\\'\\\'every category\\\'\\\' of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his views [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and [=John McEnroe=] are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in \\\'\\\'every category\\\'\\\' of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his views [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
* There\'s a reason why \'\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\'\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes and a Metacritic User Score of 2.8. Richard Roeper has called the film \
to:
* There\\\'s a reason why \\\'\\\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\\\'\\\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\\\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes and a Metacritic User Score of 2.8. Richard Roeper has called the film \\\"the \\\'\\\'Film/CitizenKane\\\'\\\' of awful movies and is currently on [[http://www.mrqe.com/lists/50_worst_movies the MRQE\\\'s list of the 50 worst movies ever.]] Now you know why this movie is hands-down one of the biggest atrocities in recent cinema history, relax and watch MarkKermode [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi7ypKqXhb4 tear this film a new one.]]
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and [=John McEnroe=] are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in ‘’every category’’ of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his views [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and [=John McEnroe=] are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in ‘’every category’’ of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his views [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
* There\'s a reason why \'\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\'\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes and a Metacritic User Score of 2.8. Richard Roeper has called the film \
to:
* There\\\'s a reason why \\\'\\\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\\\'\\\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\\\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes and a Metacritic User Score of 2.8. Richard Roeper has called the film \\\"the \\\'\\\'Film/CitizenKane\\\'\\\' of awful movies and is currently on [[http://www.mrqe.com/lists/50_worst_movies the MRQE\\\'s list of the 50 worst movies ever.]] Now you know why this movie is hands-down one of the biggest atrocities in recent cinema history, relax and watch MarkKermode [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi7ypKqXhb4 tear this film a new one.]]
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and John McEnroe are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in ‘’every category’’ of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his views [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
* 2011’s \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and John McEnroe are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in ‘’every category’’ of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his views [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Now to the task at hand: I want to hear from the rest of the tropers on the discussion page first before we can finally put an end to the EditWar surrounding these two movies once and for all. warner17 has already shared his thoughts on the eligibility of \'\'Film/JackAndJill\'\' and \'\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\'\'. I have created drafts for their respective potential entries:
to:
Now to the task at hand: I want to hear from the rest of the tropers on the discussion page first before we can finally put an end to the EditWar surrounding \\\'\\\'Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' and \\\'\\\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\\\'\\\' once and for all. I have created drafts for their respective potential entries:
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
* There\'s a reason why \'\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\'\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes and a Metacritic User Score of 2.8. Richard Roeper has called the film \
to:
* There\\\'s a reason why \\\'\\\'{{Film/Movie 43}}\\\'\\\' has become one of most notorious films to come of this decade. Its fully-loaded AllStarCast (which included actors like HalleBerry, KateWinslet, HughJackman, and [[{{Jackass}} Johnny]] [[MyFriendsAndZoidberg Knoxville]]) and sheer number of directors can\\\'t save this disaster from collapsing under its truly disgusting jokes, lack of creativity in the script, and jumbled editing. It was panned by almost every reviewer, receiving a 4% on RottenTomatoes and a Metacritic User Score of 2.8. Richard Roeper has called the film \\\"the \\\'\\\'Film/CitizenKane\\\'\\\' of awful movies and is currently on [[http://www.mrqe.com/lists/50_worst_movies the MRQE\\\'s list of the 50 worst movies ever.]] Now you know why this movie is hands-down one of the biggest atrocities in recent cinema history, relax and watch MarkKermode [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi7ypKqXhb4 tear this film a new one.]]
* 2011’s ’’Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and John McEnroe are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in ‘’every category’’ of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his views [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
* 2011’s ’’Film/JackAndJill\\\'\\\' stars Creator/AdamSandler [[ActingForTwo as a set of estranged twins]]. The premise concerns Jack Sadelstein, a commercial director, who is visited by his annoying identical twin sister Jill. During the Thanksgiving holidays, Jill is wooed by Creator/AlPacino, much to Jack’s annoyance since he sought out Pacino for [[ProductPlacement his Dunkin’ Donuts commercial]]. The film’s plot is essentially a bad [[Series/SaturdayNightLive SNL sketch]] stretched to feature length. Worse still, the gags are all lowbrow and derivative of Sandler\\\'s earlier works, the cameos from celebrities such as Drew Carrey, Shaquille O’Neal, and John McEnroe are wasted, and the direction is hopelessly careless. The film got a 3% on RottenTomatoes, a Metacritic score of 23, and a 3.5 on IMDb. It also won a Razzie in ‘’every category’’ of 2011, resulting in a record ten awards. [[WebOriginal/RedLetterMedia Half In The Bag]] takes a look at it [[http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/ here]], [[WebOriginal/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]] has his own review of it [[http://blip.tv/film-brain/bad-movie-beatdown-jack-jill-6628599/ here]], [[WebVideo/CinematicExcrement Smeghead]] gives his views [[http://blip.tv/cinematic-excrement/episode-30-jack-and-jill-6143351 here]] and MarkKermode shares his thoughts about it [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySKXQ0vKxpk here]], if you have some time to kill.
Personally, I think \\\'\\\'Jack and Jill\\\'\\\' barely has enough to avoid being listed due to its box office success and praise for Al Pacino\\\'s acting, whereas \\\'\\\'Movie 43\\\'\\\' would qualify as SBIH. warner17 has also shared his thoughts on the eligibility of these two movies. But I want to hear from the rest of you. Yea or Nay?
