Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Horrible / Film

Go To



# Merely being offensive in its subject matter, a BoxOfficeBomb, or a film you personally don't like [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment is not sufficient.]] Hard as it is to imagine at times, there is a market for all types of deviancy, no matter how small a niche it is. It has to ''fail to appeal even to that niche'' to qualify as this. If you're unsure whether it belongs here or not, visit the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Horrible.Film discussion page]] and give us your input. Otherwise, if it's something you just don't like, don't shoehorn it in. This isn't a page for [[Administrivia/ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike complaining about things that you don't like]].

to:

# Merely being offensive in its subject matter, a BoxOfficeBomb, or a film you personally don't like [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment is not sufficient.]] sufficient. Hard as it is to imagine at times, there is a market for all types of deviancy, no matter how small a niche it is. It has to ''fail to appeal even to that niche'' to qualify as this. If you're unsure whether it belongs here or not, visit the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Horrible.Film discussion page]] and give us your input. Otherwise, if it's something you just don't like, don't shoehorn it in. This isn't a page for [[Administrivia/ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike complaining about things that you don't like]].


# Merely being offensive in its subject matter, a BoxOfficeBomb, or a film you personally don't like [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement is not sufficient.]] Hard as it is to imagine at times, there is a market for all types of deviancy, no matter how small a niche it is. It has to ''fail to appeal even to that niche'' to qualify as this. If you're unsure whether it belongs here or not, visit the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Horrible.Film discussion page]] and give us your input. Otherwise, if it's something you just don't like, don't shoehorn it in. This isn't a page for [[Administrivia/ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike complaining about things that you don't like]].

to:

# Merely being offensive in its subject matter, a BoxOfficeBomb, or a film you personally don't like [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment is not sufficient.]] Hard as it is to imagine at times, there is a market for all types of deviancy, no matter how small a niche it is. It has to ''fail to appeal even to that niche'' to qualify as this. If you're unsure whether it belongs here or not, visit the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Horrible.Film discussion page]] and give us your input. Otherwise, if it's something you just don't like, don't shoehorn it in. This isn't a page for [[Administrivia/ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike complaining about things that you don't like]].


# It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone formerly associated with Website/ChannelAwesome and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a [[UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAward Razzie]] nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, if the score's that low, then it's universally despised by audiences and critics alike.

to:

# It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone formerly associated with Website/ChannelAwesome and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. [[note]]Despite what the theme song said, [=MST3K=] typically avoided thoroughly ''terrible'' films, for the sake of avoiding DarknessInducedAudienceApathy. The few exceptions ''are'' listed here, however.[[/note]] Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a [[UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAward Razzie]] nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, if the score's that low, then it's universally despised by audiences and critics alike.


In Hollywood's long and illustrious career, we've seen many different kinds of films throughout the generations. Some films [[SugarWiki/SoCoolItsAwesome have become all-time classics that hold up to this day in many people's eyes and minds and will likely continue to be hailed as great movies from here until the end of time]]. Some are [[SoOkayItsAverage pretty average at best; nothing too great, but nothing awful either]]. They're neither substantial nor terrible, they're just kind of forgettable. Some movies are often regarded as being [[SoBadItsGood incredibly cheesy and stupid]], [[NarmCharm but have their perks because of how silly and dumb they can be]], sometimes even becoming GuiltyPleasures in the process.

to:

In Hollywood's long and illustrious career, we've seen many different kinds of films throughout the generations. Some films [[SugarWiki/SoCoolItsAwesome have become all-time classics that hold up to this day in many people's eyes and minds and will likely continue to be hailed as great movies from here until the end of time]]. Some are [[SoOkayItsAverage pretty average at best; nothing too great, but nothing awful either]]. They're neither substantial nor terrible, they're just kind of forgettable. Some movies are often regarded as being [[SoBadItsGood incredibly cheesy and stupid]], [[NarmCharm but have their perks because of how silly and dumb they can be]], sometimes even becoming GuiltyPleasures in the process.
process. Some movies are a less-than-pleasant experience, but one that will ultimately just be relegated to the occasional passing thought.


# It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone formerly associated with [[Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses Channel Awesome]] and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a [[UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAward Razzie]] nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, if the score's that low, then it's universally despised by audiences and critics alike.

to:

# It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone formerly associated with [[Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses Channel Awesome]] Website/ChannelAwesome and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a [[UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAward Razzie]] nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, if the score's that low, then it's universally despised by audiences and critics alike.


# It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from [[Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses Channel Awesome]] and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a [[UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAward Razzie]] nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, if the score's that low, then it's universally despised by audiences and critics alike.

to:

# It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from formerly associated with [[Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses Channel Awesome]] and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a [[UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAward Razzie]] nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, if the score's that low, then it's universally despised by audiences and critics alike.


# Merely being offensive in its subject matter, a BoxOfficeBomb, or a film you don't plain like [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement is not sufficient.]] Hard as it is to imagine at times, there is a market for all types of deviancy, no matter how small a niche it is. It has to ''fail to appeal even to that niche'' to qualify as this. (If you're unsure whether it belongs here or not, visit the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Horrible.Film discussion page]] and give us your input. Otherwise, if it's something you just plain don't like, please don't shoehorn it in, this isn't a page for complaining about things that fail to you.)

# It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from [[Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses Channel Awesome]] and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a [[UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAward Razzie]] nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, universally despised by audience and critics alike.

to:

# Merely being offensive in its subject matter, a BoxOfficeBomb, or a film you personally don't plain like [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement is not sufficient.]] Hard as it is to imagine at times, there is a market for all types of deviancy, no matter how small a niche it is. It has to ''fail to appeal even to that niche'' to qualify as this. (If If you're unsure whether it belongs here or not, visit the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Horrible.Film discussion page]] and give us your input. Otherwise, if it's something you just plain don't like, please don't shoehorn it in, this in. This isn't a page for [[Administrivia/ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike complaining about things that fail to you.)

you don't like]].

# It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from [[Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses Channel Awesome]] and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a [[UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAward Razzie]] nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, if the score's that low, then it's universally despised by audience audiences and critics alike.


# Merely being offensive in its subject matter, a BoxOfficeBomb, or a film you don't plain like [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement is not sufficient.]] Hard as it is to imagine at times, there is a market for all types of deviancy, no matter how small a niche it is. It has to ''fail to appeal even to that niche'' to qualify as this. (If you're unsure whether it belongs here or not, visit the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Horrible.Film discussion page]] and give us your input. Otherwise, if it's something you just plain don't like, please don't shoehorn it in, this isn't a page for complaining about things that fail to you.)

to:

# Merely being offensive in its subject matter, a BoxOfficeBomb, or a film you don't plain like [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement is not sufficient.]] Hard as it is to imagine at times, there is a market for all types of deviancy, no matter how small a niche it is. It has to ''fail to appeal even to that niche'' to qualify as this. (If you're unsure whether it belongs here or not, visit the [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Horrible.Film discussion page]] and give us your input. Otherwise, if it's something you just plain don't like, please don't shoehorn it in, this isn't a page for complaining about things that fail to you.)


# It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from [[Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses Channel Awesome]] and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a [[UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAwawrd Razzie]] nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, universally despised by audience and critics alike.

to:

# It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from [[Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses Channel Awesome]] and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a [[UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAwawrd [[UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAward Razzie]] nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, universally despised by audience and critics alike.


# It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a Razzie nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, universally despised by audience and critics alike.

to:

# It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses [[Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses Channel Awesome]] and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a Razzie [[UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAwawrd Razzie]] nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, universally despised by audience and critics alike.


For more information, don't forget to give [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_considered_the_worst The Other Wiki]] a look.

to:

For more information, don't forget to give [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_considered_the_worst The Other Wiki]] a look.
look (though it should be noted that some of the films on that list are widely considered SoBadItsGood, such as ''Film/TheRoom'').


# It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film on [[https://showboxofficial.com/ Showbox]] just because it earned a Razzie nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, universally despised by audience and critics alike.

to:

# It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film on [[https://showboxofficial.com/ Showbox]] just because it earned a Razzie nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, universally despised by audience and critics alike.


# It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a Razzie nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, universally despised by audience and critics alike.

to:

# It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film on [[https://showboxofficial.com/ Showbox]] just because it earned a Razzie nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, universally despised by audience and critics alike.


* [[Horrible/LiveActionFilms Live-Action Movies]] (Repeat Offenders)

to:

* [[Horrible/LiveActionFilms Live-Action Movies]] Films]] (Repeat Offenders)

Showing 15 edit(s) of 2089

Top

How well does it match the trope?

Example of:

/

Media sources:

/

Report