[003]
MajinGojira
Current Version
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
For #6, I say we keep it as \
to:
For #6, I say we keep it as \\\"All Prehistoric Beasts\\\" because most of them will be lumped together with dinosaurs (via varying degrees of TheyJustDidntCare and whatnot) due to them being just prehistoric.
Though perhaps an animal should have a specific number of appearances outside of informational books before it is considered stock. I\\\'d say 3 or more appearances in fiction/literature, TV, Movies, etc.
Toys would honestly have nearly as much variety as in books, so only the major lines/series should be mentioned (IE: sets with more than 20 pieces, or decade+ reprint runs), and we should only consider one appearance from that media as one instance (IE: they won\\\'t get multiple instances points for appearing in more than one toyset). Otherwise, we\\\'d have to add things like Sphenacodon to the list of stock Therapsids.
[[http://www.dinosaurcollector.150m.com/ Here]] is a place where we can double check things.
Aside from Dilophosaurus, it may remove others as well (Ginanotosaurus may just squeeze in due to \\\'\\\'DinoCrisis\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'Dinotopia\\\'\\\' and Toys).
Though perhaps an animal should have a specific number of appearances outside of informational books before it is considered stock. I\\\'d say 3 or more appearances in fiction/literature, TV, Movies, etc.
Toys would honestly have nearly as much variety as in books, so only the major lines/series should be mentioned (IE: sets with more than 20 pieces, or decade+ reprint runs), and we should only consider one appearance from that media as one instance (IE: they won\\\'t get multiple instances points for appearing in more than one toyset). Otherwise, we\\\'d have to add things like Sphenacodon to the list of stock Therapsids.
[[http://www.dinosaurcollector.150m.com/ Here]] is a place where we can double check things.
Aside from Dilophosaurus, it may remove others as well (Ginanotosaurus may just squeeze in due to \\\'\\\'DinoCrisis\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'Dinotopia\\\'\\\' and Toys).
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
For #6, I say we keep it as \
to:
For #6, I say we keep it as \\\"All Prehistoric Beasts\\\" because most of them will be lumped together with dinosaurs (via varying degrees of TheyJustDidntCare and whatnot) due to them being just prehistoric.
Though perhaps an animal should have a specific number of appearances outside of informational books before it is considered stock. I\\\'d say 3 or more appearances in fiction/literature, TV, Movies, etc.
Toys would honestly have nearly as much variety as in books, so only the major lines/series should be mentioned (IE: sets with more than 20 pieces), and we should only consider one appearance from that media as one instance (IE: they won\\\'t get multiple instances points for appearing in more than one toyset).
[[http://www.dinosaurcollector.150m.com/ Here]] is a place where we can double check things.
Aside from Dilophosaurus, it may remove others as well (Ginanotosaurus may just squeeze in due to \\\'\\\'DinoCrisis\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'Dinotopia\\\'\\\' and Toys).
Though perhaps an animal should have a specific number of appearances outside of informational books before it is considered stock. I\\\'d say 3 or more appearances in fiction/literature, TV, Movies, etc.
Toys would honestly have nearly as much variety as in books, so only the major lines/series should be mentioned (IE: sets with more than 20 pieces), and we should only consider one appearance from that media as one instance (IE: they won\\\'t get multiple instances points for appearing in more than one toyset).
[[http://www.dinosaurcollector.150m.com/ Here]] is a place where we can double check things.
Aside from Dilophosaurus, it may remove others as well (Ginanotosaurus may just squeeze in due to \\\'\\\'DinoCrisis\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'Dinotopia\\\'\\\' and Toys).
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
For #6, I say we keep it as \
to:
For #6, I say we keep it as \\\"All Prehistoric Beasts\\\" because most of them will be lumped together with dinosaurs (via varying degrees of TheyJustDidntCare and whatnot) due to them being just prehistoric.
Though perhaps an animal should have a specific number of appearances outside of informational books before it is considered stock. I\\\'d say 3 or more appearances in fiction/literature, TV, Movies, etc.
Toys would honestly have nearly as much variety as in books, so only the major lines/series should be mentioned (IE: sets with more than 20 pieces).
Though perhaps an animal should have a specific number of appearances outside of informational books before it is considered stock. I\\\'d say 3 or more appearances in fiction/literature, TV, Movies, etc.
Toys would honestly have nearly as much variety as in books, so only the major lines/series should be mentioned (IE: sets with more than 20 pieces).
