[002]
99.122.86.201
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Though I am not defending Dads (as I\'ve never watched it), there were actually a pair of logical reasons why it was given the back nine. First, the show does well with the 18-49 crowd (and its rating are actually about mid-range for the new series this season). And second, Fox has very little hope with its mid-season series (and had already stopped production on one of them). So it\'s less of a case of \
to:
Though I am not defending Dads (as I\\\'ve never watched it), there were actually a pair of logical reasons why it was given the back nine. First, the show does well with the 18-49 crowd (and its rating are actually about mid-range for the new series this season). And second, Fox has very little hope with its mid-season sitcoms (and had already stopped production on one of them). So it\\\'s less of a case of \\\"What An Idiot\\\" and more of Fox knowing there are people watching it.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Though I am not defending Dads (as I\'ve never watched it), there were actually a pair of logical reasons why it was given the back nine. First, the show does well with the 18-49 crowd (and it\'s about mid-range for the new series this season). And second, Fox has very little hope with its mid-season series (and had already stopped production on one of them). So it\'s less of a case of \
to:
Though I am not defending Dads (as I\\\'ve never watched it), there were actually a pair of logical reasons why it was given the back nine. First, the show does well with the 18-49 crowd (and its rating are actually about mid-range for the new series this season). And second, Fox has very little hope with its mid-season series (and had already stopped production on one of them). So it\\\'s less of a case of \\\"What An Idiot\\\" and more of Fox knowing there are people watching it.
