Discussion History Pantheon / Nature

I\\\'ve twice pulled LightIsNotGood from Raava. I think Raava\\\'s \\\"not good\\\"-ness is covered by GoodIsNotNice, because Raava is still a force for good through and through. She strives for order and minimizing casualties. That she looks down on humans doesn\\\'t make her evil. And the comments about her being a SuperpoweredEvilSide is simply inaccurate as well since the Avatar State isn\\\'t portrayed as such (note that SuperpoweredEvilSide isn\\\'t anywhere on the ATLA page). At worst, you can say that the Avatar State (which isn\\\'t just Raava controlling Aang, anyway) makes Aang more aggressive, but it\\\'s still always acting for good.

I feel like someone is misinterpreting LightIsNotGood, which is about evil characters that have a light-themed motif. Unless you\\\'re calling Raava a villain, LightIsNotGood does not apply.