Discussion History WesternAnimation / XiaolinChronicles

John Lennon was Supine because of his shy and moody behavior. He\'s selfish, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly snarky and insensitive facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was Supine because of his shy and moody behavior. He\'s selfish, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly snarky and insensitive facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was Sanguine because of his easy-going and impulsive behavior. He\'s selfish, naive, quick-witted and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly snarky and insensitive facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was sanguine because of his easy-going and impulsive behavior. He\'s selfish, naive, quick-witted and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly snarky and insensitive facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s selfish, naive, gentle and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly sarcastic and cruel facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s selfish, naive, gentle and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly sarcastic and cruel facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s selfish, naive, gentle and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly sarcastic and cruel facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s selfish, naive, gentle and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly sarcastic and cruel facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s selfish, naive, gentle and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly sarcastic and cruel facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s selfish, naive, gentle and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly sarcastic and cruel facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s selfish, naive, gentle and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly sarcastic and cruel facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was phlegmatic because of his stubborn and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s selfish, naive, gentle and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly sarcastic and cruel facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s compassionate, naive, gentle and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly sarcastic and cruel facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s compassionate, naive, gentle and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly sarcastic and cruel facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s compassionate, naive, gentle and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly sarcastic and cruel facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s compassionate, naive, gentle and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly sarcastic and cruel facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was phlegmatic because of his shy and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s compassionate, naive, gentle and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly sarcastic and snide facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s compassionate, naive, gentle and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly sarcastic and snide facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was phlegmatic because of his snarky and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s lazy, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due partly to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive, cynical and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. Deep down, he can be a generous person.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive, cynical and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was sanguine because of his moody and passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and insecure behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and insecure behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and insecure behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and insecure behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and insecure behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and insecure behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and insecure behavior. He\'s idealistic, naive, temperamental and has a chip on his shoulder due to his upbringing. He hides behind an overly aggressive and sarcastic facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweet-heart.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and insecure behavior. He acts kind, idealistic, and considerate yet cruel, aggressive, and very outspoken. He hides behind an overly aggressive and arrogant facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and insecure behavior. He acts kind, idealistic, and considerate yet cruel, aggressive, and very outspoken. He hides behind an overly aggressive and arrogant facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and insecure behavior. He acts kind, idealistic, and considerate yet cruel, aggressive, and very outspoken. He hides behind an overly aggressive and arrogant facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and insecure behavior. He acts kind, idealistic, and considerate yet cruel, aggressive, and very outspoken. He hides behind an overly aggressive and arrogant facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and insecure behavior. He acts kind, idealistic, and considerate yet cruel, aggressive, and very outspoken. He hides behind an overly aggressive and arrogant facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and insecure behavior. He acts kind, idealistic, and considerate yet cruel, aggressive, and very outspoken. He hides behind an overly aggressive and arrogant facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and insecure behavior. He acts kind, idealistic, and considerate yet cruel, aggressive, and very outspoken. He hides behind an overly aggressive and arrogant facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was choleric because of his charismatic yet shy and insecure behavior. He acts cruel, aggressive, and very outspoken yet can be kind, idealistic, and considerate. He hides behind an overly aggressive and arrogant facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and insecure behavior. He acts cruel, aggressive, and very outspoken yet can be kind, idealistic, and considerate at the same time. He hides behind an overly aggressive and arrogant facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was supine because of his shy and insecure behavior. He\'s acts cruel, aggressive, and very outspoken yet can be kind, idealistic, and considerate at the same time. He hides behind an overly aggressive and arrogant facade in order to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was choleric because of his charismatic yet neurotic behavior. He\'s cruel, aggressive, and very outspoken yet kind, idealistic, and considerate at the same time. He puts up an overly aggressive and arrogant facade to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was choleric because of his charismatic yet neurotic behavior. He\'s cruel, aggressive, and very outspoken yet kind, idealistic, and considerate at the same time. He puts up an overly aggressive and arrogant facade to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was mostly choleric along with supine because of his charismatic yet neurotic behavior. He\'s cruel, aggressive, and very outspoken yet kind, idealistic, and considerate at the same time. He puts up an overly aggressive and arrogant facade to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was supine because of his overall passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s idealistic, quiet, and laidback yet cruel, aggressive, and outspoken at the same time. He puts up an overly aggressive and arrogant facade to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was supine because of his overall passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s loyal, quiet, and laidback yet cruel, aggressive, and outspoken at the same time. He puts up an overly aggressive and arrogant facade to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was supine because of his overall passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s loyal, quiet, and considerate yet cruel, aggressive, and outspoken at the same time. He puts up an overly aggressive and arrogant facade to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was supine because of his overall passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s loyal, quiet, and considerate yet cruel, aggressive, and outspoken at the same time. He puts up an overly aggressive and arrogant facade to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was supine because of his overall passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s loyal, quiet, and considerate yet cruel, aggressive, and outspoken at the same time. He puts up an overly aggressive and arrogant facade to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was supine because of his overall passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s loyal, quiet, and considerate yet cruel, aggressive, and outspoken at the same time. He puts up an overly aggressive and arrogant facade to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was supine because of his overall passive-aggressive behavior. He\'s loyal, quiet, and considerate yet cruel, aggressive, and outspoken at the same time. He puts up an overly aggressive and arrogant facade to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was mostly choleric along with supine because of his aggressive and charismatic attitude yet neurotic and insecure nature. He puts up an overly aggressive and arrogant facade to hide his insecurities. He\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was supine because of his aggressive and neurotic yet kind and forgiving nature. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a generous person and rather a sweetheart.

John Lennon was mostly choleric along with supine because of his aggressive yet neurotic and sarcastic nature. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart.

I think that John Lennon was mostly supine because of his neurotic and sarcastic nature along with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart.

Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his upbeat nature yet conservative and domineering attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s friendly yet at the same time very selfish, narcissistic, and has issues with being told what to do. In a nutshell, he was overly sensitive to criticism. He especially can be condescending toward his bandmates and a major show off which greatly irritates John, George, and even Ringo.

George Harrison was mostly melancholic because of his calm and impenetrable attitude mixed with his overly critical behavior. He has a very pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature which further detaches him from his bandmates. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and condescending towards him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George really hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stood up to Paul and challenged his ideas.

Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly choleric along with melancholic because of his upbeat nature yet conservative and domineering attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s friendly yet at the same time very selfish, narcissistic, and has issues with being told what to do. In a nutshell, he was overly sensitive to criticism. He especially can be condescending toward his bandmates and a major show off which greatly irritates John, George, and even Ringo.

George Harrison was mostly melancholic along with choleric because of his calm and impenetrable attitude mixed with overly critical behavior. He has a very pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature which further detaches him from his bandmates. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and condescending towards him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George really hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stood up to Paul and challenged his ideas.

I think that John Lennon was mostly phlegmatic because of his neurotic and sarcastic nature along with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart.

Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his upbeat nature yet conservative and domineering attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s friendly yet at the same time very selfish, narcissistic, and has issues with being told what to do. In a nutshell, he was overly sensitive to criticism. He especially can be condescending toward his bandmates and a major show off which greatly irritates both John, George, and even Ringo.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic along with phlegmatic because of his charismatic yet overly neurotic nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart.

Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly phlegmatic along with sanguine because of his upbeat nature yet conservative and domineering attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s friendly yet at the same time very selfish, narcissistic, and has issues with being told what to do. In a nutshell, he was overly sensitive to criticism. He especially can be condescending toward his bandmates and a major show off which greatly irritates both John, George, and even Ringo.

George Harrison was mostly melancholic along with sanguine because of his calm and impenetrable attitude. He has a very pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature which further detaches him from his bandmates. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and condescending towards him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George really hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stood up to Paul and challenged his ideas.

Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his random mood swings.

So altogether, I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the meticulous and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing yet moody realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic along with phlegmatic because of his charismatic yet overly neurotic nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly phlegmatic along with sanguine because of his upbeat nature yet conservative and domineering attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s friendly yet at the same time very selfish, narcissistic, and has issues with being told what to do. In a nutshell, he was overly sensitive to criticism. He especially can be condescending toward his bandmates and a major show off which greatly irritates both John, George, and even Ringo. George Harrison was mostly melancholic along with sanguine because of his calm and impenetrable attitude. He has a very pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature which further detaches him from his bandmates. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George really hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stood up to Paul and challenged his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic along with phlegmatic because of his charismatic yet overly neurotic nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly phlegmatic along with sanguine because of his upbeat nature yet conservative and domineering attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s friendly yet at the same time very selfish, narcissistic, and has issues with being told what to do. In a nutshell, he was overly sensitive to criticism. He especially can be condescending toward his bandmates and a major show off which greatly irritates both John, George, and even Ringo. George Harrison was mostly melancholic because of his calm and impenetrable attitude. He has a very pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature which further detaches him from the other Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George really hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stood up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic along with phlegmatic because of his charismatic yet overly neurotic nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly sanguine because of his upbeat nature yet brash and overconfident attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s friendly yet at the same time very selfish, narcissistic, and has issues with being told what to do. In a nutshell, he was overly sensitive to criticism. He especially can be condescending toward his bandmates and a major show off which greatly irritates both John, George, and even Ringo. George Harrison was mostly melancholic because of his calm and impenetrable attitude. He has a very pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature which further detaches him from the other Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George really hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stood up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic along with phlegmatic because of his charismatic yet overly neurotic nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly sanguine because of his upbeat nature yet brash and overconfident attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s friendly yet at the same time very selfish, narcissistic, and has issues with being told what to do. In a nutshell, he was overly sensitive to criticism. He especially can be condescending toward his bandmates and a major show off which greatly irritates both John, George, and even Ringo. George Harrison was mostly melancholic along with sanguine because of his calm and impenetrable attitude mixed with his rather sporadic moments of being impulsive. He has a very pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature which further detaches him from the other Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George really hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stood up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic along with phlegmatic because of his charismatic yet overly neurotic nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly choleric along with melancholic because of his upbeat nature yet conservative and overconfident attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s friendly yet at the same time very selfish, narcissistic, and has issues with being told what to do. In a nutshell, he was overly sensitive to criticism. He especially can be condescending toward his bandmates and a major show off which greatly irritates both John, George, and even Ringo. George Harrison was mostly melancholic along with sanguine because of his calm and impenetrable attitude mixed with his rather sporadic moments of being impulsive. He has a very pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature which further detaches him from the other Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George really hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic along with phlegmatic because of his charismatic yet overly neurotic nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly sanguine because of his upbeat nature yet brash and overconfident attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s friendly yet at the same time very selfish, narcissistic, and has issues with being told what to do. In a nutshell, he was overly sensitive to criticism. He especially can be condescending toward his bandmates and a major show off which greatly irritates both John, George, and even Ringo. George Harrison was mostly melancholic along with sanguine because of his calm and impenetrable attitude mixed with his rather sporadic moments of being impulsive. He has a very pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature which further detaches him from the other Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George really hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic along with phlegmatic because of his charismatic yet overly neurotic nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly sanguine because of his upbeat nature yet brash and overconfident attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s friendly yet at the same time very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. He especially can be condescending toward his bandmates and be a show off. George Harrison was melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his pretty random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic along with phlegmatic because of his charismatic yet overly neurotic nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly choleric along with sanguine because of his upbeat nature yet brash and overconfident attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his pretty random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic along with phlegmatic because of his charismatic yet overly neurotic nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be sanguine because of his upbeat nature yet brash and overconfident attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his pretty random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly choleric along with phlegmatic because of his charismatic yet overly neurotic nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be sanguine because of his upbeat nature yet brash and overconfident attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his pretty random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic along with phlegmatic because of his somewhat charismatic yet overly neurotic nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be sanguine because of his upbeat nature yet brash and overconfident attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his pretty random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly choleric along with phlegmatic because of his charismatic yet overly neurotic nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be sanguine because of his upbeat nature yet brash and overconfident attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his pretty random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly choleric along with phlegmatic because of his charismatic yet overly neurotic nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to also be mostly choleric but mixed with sanguine because of his upbeat nature yet brash and overconfident attitude. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his pretty random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly choleric along with phlegmatic because of his charismatic yet overly neurotic nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be sanguine because of his upbeat nature and brash leadership skills. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his pretty random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic along with phlegmatic because of his neuroticism and overly bitter nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be sanguine because of his upbeat nature and brash leadership skills. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his pretty random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic along with phlegmatic because of his neuroticism and overly bitter nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly choleric along with melancholic because of his upbeat nature and leadership skills mixed with his overly critical and conservative tendencies. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his pretty random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic along with phlegmatic because of his neuroticism and overly bitter nature mixed with his generosity and witty humor. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be sanguine because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his pretty random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic along with phlegmatic because of his neuroticism and generosity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be sanguine because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is mostly phlegmatic along with melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality mixed with his pretty random mood swings. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was a mix of melancholic and phlegmatic because of his neuroticism and generosity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly sanguine because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was mostly melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was a mix of choleric and phlegmatic because of his natural charisma and generosity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly sanguine because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was mostly melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was a mix of choleric and phlegmatic because of his natural charisma and generosity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly sanguine because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was mostly melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was a mix of melancholic and phlegmatic because of his neuroticism and generosity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly sanguine because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was mostly melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was a mix of melancholic and phlegmatic because of his neuroticism and generosity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be a mix of choleric and melancholic because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was mostly melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was a mix of melancholic and phlegmatic because of his neuroticism and generosity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be a mix of choleric and melancholic because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was a mix of melancholic and sanguine because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles and independent nature. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was a mix of melancholic and phlegmatic because of his neuroticism and generosity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be a mix of choleric and melancholic because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was a mostly melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was a mix of melancholic and phlegmatic because of his neuroticism and generosity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be a mix of choleric and melancholic because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was a mix of melancholic and sanguine because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was a mix of melancholic and phlegmatic because of his neuroticism and generosity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be a mix of choleric and melancholic because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was mostly melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. How he acts towards Paul is very similar to how Raphael (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) acts towards Leonardo. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and goal oriented, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was a mix of melancholic and phlegmatic because of his neuroticism and generosity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly sanguine because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was mostly melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. How he acts towards Paul is very similar to how Raphael (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) acts towards Leonardo. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was a mix of choleric and phlegmatic because of his charisma and generosity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be a mix of choleric and sanguine because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and narcissistic and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was mostly melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. How he acts towards Paul is very similar to how Raphael (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) acts towards Leonardo. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was a mix of choleric and phlegmatic because of his charisma and generosity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly sanguine because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was mostly melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. How he acts towards Paul is very similar to how Raphael (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) acts towards Leonardo. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was a mix of sanguine and phlegmatic because of his sheer impulsivity and generosity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly sanguine because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was mostly melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. How he acts towards Paul is very similar to how Raphael (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) acts towards Leonardo. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was a mix of sanguine and phlegmatic because of his sheer impulsivity and generosity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly choleric because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s apparently very selfish and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was mostly melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. How he acts towards Paul is very similar to how Raphael (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) acts towards Leonardo. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was a mix of sanguine and phlegmatic because of his sheer impulsivity and generosity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very kind and generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly sanguine because of both his optimism and brash leadership skills during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck, I noticed from some books I read, he was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. He\\\'s altogether a cool person but apparently is very selfish and has issues with being told what to do or basically was overly sensitive to criticism. George Harrison was mostly melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Jealousy could possibly be part of the reason for his hatred towards him but more or less George hated Paul\\\'s personality. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. How he acts towards Paul is very similar to how Raphael (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) acts towards Leonardo. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly sanguine because of his sheer impulsivity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison was mostly melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. How he acts towards Paul is very similar to how Raphael (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) acts towards Leonardo. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly sanguine because of his sheer impulsivity. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison was mostly phlegmatic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. How he acts towards Paul is very similar to how Raphael (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) acts towards Leonardo. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic because of his sheer neuroticism. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison was mostly phlegmatic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. He seemed to be the only one in the band who regularly stands up to Paul and challenges his ideas. How he acts towards Paul is very similar to how Raphael (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) acts towards Leonardo. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic because of his sheer neuroticism. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very generous person and rather a sweetheart. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison was mostly phlegmatic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. How he acts towards Paul is very similar to how Raphael (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) acts towards Leonardo. Ringo Starr, he is a mix of phlegmatic and melancholic because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly melancholic because of his utter neuroticism and heavy reliance on sarcasm. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very generous person and rather a sweetheart. He acts similar to how Raphael (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) acts because of that behavior. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be mostly choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison was also melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he (along with John) was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Ringo Starr, he is actually sanguine as well because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly phlegmatic because of his wit and heavy reliance on sarcasm. He puts up an overly aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very generous person and rather a sweetheart. He acts similar to how Raphael (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) acts because of that behavior. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison is melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he (along with John) was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Ringo Starr, he is actually sanguine as well because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure and apathetic \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly phlegmatic because of his wit and heavy reliance on sarcasm. He puts on an aggressive facade to hide his insecurities. He\\\'s deep down a very generous person and rather a sweetheart. He acts similar to how Raphael (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) acts because of that behavior. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison is melancholic because of his pessimistic attitude towards The Beatles. After the recordings of Revolver, he (along with John) was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and when it came to his attitude towards Paul McCartney, it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Ringo Starr, he is actually sanguine as well because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I see John as the aggressive yet insecure and apathetic \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly sanguine because I noticed how he himself stated that he had a big mouth and he was considered lazy and disorganized compared to Paul McCartney. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison is phlegmatic because of his attitude towards The Beatles. After the recording of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and his attitude towards Paul McCartney sort reminds me of Leonardo and Raphael from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. They were so different from each other in terms of likes and dislikes and it seems as though George despised Paul for being bossy and rather condescending to him and the other bandmates. Ringo Starr, he is actually sanguine as well because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I saw John as the charismatic yet insecure and apathetic \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the sarcastic, rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly sanguine because I noticed how he himself stated that he had a big mouth and he was considered lazy and disorganized compared to Paul McCartney. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison is melancholic because of his attitude towards The Beatles. After the recording of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and his attitude towards Paul McCartney sort reminds me of Leonardo and Raphael from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. They were so different from each other in terms of likes and dislikes and it seems as though George (who hated doing commercial songs along with Lennon) despised Paul for being a sellout. Ringo Starr, he is actually sanguine as well because of his friendly and unassuming personality. Personally I saw John as the charismatic yet insecure and apathetic \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the sarcastic, rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly sanguine because I noticed how he himself stated that he had a big mouth and he was considered lazy and disorganized compared to Paul McCartney. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison is melancholic because of his attitude towards The Beatles. After the recording of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and his attitude towards Paul McCartney sort reminds me of Leonardo and Raphael from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. They were so different from each other in terms of likes and dislikes and it seems as though George (who hated doing commercial songs along with Lennon) despised Paul for being a sellout. Ringo Starr, he is actually phlegmatic because of his quiet and unassuming personality. Personally I saw John as the charismatic yet insecure and apathetic \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the sarcastic, rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly sanguine because I noticed how he himself stated that he had a big mouth and he was considered lazy and disorganized compared to Paul McCartney. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison is phlegmatic because of his attitude towards The Beatles. After the recording of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and his attitude towards Paul McCartney sort reminds me of Leonardo and Raphael from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. They were so different from each other in terms of likes and dislikes and it seems as though George (who hated doing commercial songs along with Lennon) despised Paul for being a sellout. Ringo Starr, he is actually melancholic because of his quiet and moody personality. Personally I saw John as the charismatic yet insecure and apathetic \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the sarcastic, rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly sanguine because I noticed how he himself stated that he had a big mouth and he was considered lazy and disorganized compared to Paul McCartney. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison is melancholic because of his attitude towards The Beatles. After the recording of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and his attitude towards Paul McCartney sort reminds me of Leonardo and Raphael from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. They were so different from each other in terms of likes and dislikes and it seems as though George (who hated doing commercial songs along with Lennon) despised Paul for being a sellout. Ringo Starr, he is actually phlegmatic because of his quiet and unassuming personality. Personally I saw John as the charismatic yet insecure and apathetic \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the sarcastic, rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly sanguine because I noticed how he himself stated that he had a big mouth and he was considered lazy and disorganized compared to Paul McCartney. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison is phlegmatic because of his attitude towards The Beatles. After the recording of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and his attitude towards Paul McCartney sort reminds me of Leonardo and Raphael from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. They were so different from each other in terms of likes and dislikes and it seems as though George (who hated doing commercial songs along with Lennon) despised Paul for being a sellout. Ringo Starr, he is actually melancholic because of his quiet and rather moody personality. Personally I saw John as the charismatic yet insecure and apathetic \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the sarcastic, rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing yet moody realist.

I think that John Lennon was mostly sanguine because I noticed how he himself stated that he had a big mouth and he was considered lazy and disorganized compared to Paul McCartney. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison is phlegmatic because of his attitude towards The Beatles. After the recording of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and his attitude towards Paul McCartney sort reminds me of Leonardo and Raphael from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. They were so different from each other in terms of likes and dislikes and it seems as though George (who hated doing commercial songs along with Lennon) despised Paul for being a sellout. Ringo Starr, he is actually melancholic because of his quiet and rather moody personality. Personally I saw John as the charismatic yet insecure and apathetic \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the sarcastic, rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing yet moody realist of the band.

I think that John Lennon was mostly sanguine because I noticed how he himself stated that he had a big mouth and he was considered lazy and disorganized compared to Paul McCartney. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison is melancholic because of his attitude towards The Beatles. After the recording of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and his attitude towards Paul McCartney sort reminds me of Leonardo and Raphael from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. They were so different from each other in terms of likes and dislikes and it seems as though George (who hated doing commercial songs along with Lennon) despised Paul for being a sellout. Ringo Starr, he is phlegmatic of course because of his quiet and agreeable personality. Personally I saw John as the charismatic yet insecure and apathetic \\\"leader\\\" who severely lacked motivation and confidence, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band and is very domineering and optimistic, George as the rebellious and stubborn pessimist, and Ringo as the easygoing realist of the band.

I think that John Lennon was mostly sanguine because I noticed how he himself stated that he had a big mouth and he was considered lazy and disorganized compared to Paul McCartney. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison is phlegmatic because of his attitude towards The Beatles. After the recording of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and his attitude towards Paul McCartney sort reminds me of Leonardo and Raphael from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. They were so different from each other in terms of likes and dislikes and it seems as though George (who hated doing commercial songs along with Lennon) despised Paul for being a sellout. Ringo Starr, he is melancholic of course because of his quiet and moody personality. Personally I saw John as a charismatic yet insecure leader who never wanted to be one, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band, George as the rebellious and stubborn member, and Ringo as the moody realist of the band.

I think that John Lennon was mostly sanguine because I noticed how he himself stated that he had a big mouth and he was considered lazy and disorganized compared to Paul McCartney. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake, not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison is melancholic because of his attitude towards The Beatles. After the recording of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and his attitude towards Paul McCartney sort reminds me of Leonardo and Raphael from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. They were so different from each other in terms of likes and dislikes and it seems as though George (who hated doing commercial songs along with Lennon) despised Paul for being a sellout. Ringo Starr, he is also sanguine of course because of his amiable personality. Personally I saw John as a charismatic yet insecure leader who never wanted to be one, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band, George as the rebellious and stubborn member, and Ringo as the easygoing realist of the band.

I think that John Lennon was mostly sanguine because I noticed how he himself stated that he had a big mouth and he was considered lazy and disorganized compared to Paul McCartney. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison is phlegmatic because of his attitude towards The Beatles. After the recording of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and his attitude towards Paul McCartney sort reminds me of Leonardo and Raphael from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. They were so different from each other in terms of likes and dislikes and it seems as though George(who hated doing commercial songs along with Lennon) despised Paul for being a sellout. Ringo Starr, he is also sanguine of course because of his amiable personality. Personally I saw John as a leader who never wanted to be one, Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band, George as the rebellious and stubborn member, and Ringo as the easygoing realist of the band.

I think that John Lennon was mostly sanguine because I noticed how he himself stated that he had a big mouth and he was considered lazy and disorganized compared to Paul McCartney. Paul McCartney, I consider him to be choleric because he actually showed some leadership qualities during the time he was with the Beatles. Heck I noticed from some books I read, He was a prime example of a control freak who accomplished things all for his own sake not everyone else\\\'s. George Harrison is phlegmatic because of his attitude towards The Beatles. After the recording of Revolver, he was ready to leave the group much quicker than everyone else and his attitude towards Paul McCartney sort reminds me of Leonardo and Raphael from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. They were so different from each other in terms of likes and dislikes and it seems as though George(who hated doing commercial songs along with Lennon) despised Paul for being a sellout. Ringo Starr, he is also sanguine of course because of his amiable personality. Personally I saw John as a leader who never wanted to be one while Paul as second in command who aimed to take control of the band!