[001]
TrevMUN
Current Version
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
If there ever was a timeline in that article, it\'s been deleted. It looks like there was even a motion to delete the article entirely, judging from what {{Wikipedian Updater}}s said on its discussion page:
to:
If there ever was a timeline in that article, it\\\'s been deleted. It looks like there was even a motion to delete the article entirely, judging from what {{Wikipedia Updater}}s said on its discussion page:
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"\\\'\\\'I suppose the History Channel stepped into the breach because we don\\\'t have an \\\'Unverifiable Speculation Posing as Science Channel\\\'. Does any contributor wish to make the case why \\\'Life after People\\\' is worthy of an extensive entry in Wikipedia? Do we have to accept that everything shown on TV, regardless of its worth, is inevitably notable because it is seen by a lot of people and will inevitably have an impact? [This paragraph by se16teddy]\\\'\\\'\\\"
Just another reason why Wikipedia Is Unreliable, I suppose.
Just another reason why Wikipedia Is Unreliable, I suppose.
