[002]
BigT
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Me: Kinda. If you are undecided on which one it fits in, deciding whether it is {{fanservice}} is a good rule of thumb. But there are other differences. For one thing,
to:
Me: Not really. The sexualization is a difference, but how it is revealed is also important. This trope is incidental. Having someone drop their pants would not count here, but it would in ISeeLondon. Also, the other trope includes seeing parts of the panties that are not covering any naughty bits, like the top of boxers.
Furthermore, ISeeLondon is about humiliation. The person is usually embarrassed, or at least is assumed by others that they would be. A PantyShot is usually not even revealed to the subject at all.
Furthermore, ISeeLondon is about humiliation. The person is usually embarrassed, or at least is assumed by others that they would be. A PantyShot is usually not even revealed to the subject at all.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Johnny E: So, despite my primary reaction to much of this article being to run away very fast, I shall try to put wiki-professionalism ahead of my own mental health - isn\'t the difference between this and I See London that this version is eroticised to some degree? If not, what is the difference, but if so, an awful lot of the examples seem to be in the wrong place. On the other hand, thanks to Rule34 I\'m not even sure The Same But Sexy is a feasible trope distinction.
to:
Johnny E: So, despite my primary reaction to much of this article being to run away very fast, I shall try to put wiki-professionalism ahead of my own mental health - isn\\\'t the difference between this and ISeeLondon that this version is eroticised to some degree? If not, what is the difference, but if so, an awful lot of the examples seem to be in the wrong place. On the other hand, thanks to Rule34 I\\\'m not even sure The Same But Sexy is a feasible trope distinction.
