[001]
Larkmarn
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Do you really think the page was written by \
to:
Do you really think the page was written by \\\"one or two editors\\\"? That\\\'s... out there. You can look at the page\\\'s history yourself. The fact that at least the dozens of editors on this page (and Headscratchers, etc), the Bioshock Wiki, and TheOtherWiki (despite your claim earlier, it says \\\"One tear leads them to a world where...\\\" I only bring it up because you brought it up first, naturally) all seem to agree on the \\\"you go through to other Universes\\\" idea speaks more to a consensus than anything else. Any message board, any Let\\\'s Play, will mention you going through the tears to a new world. Why? Because that\\\'s what in-game characters explicitly say that you\\\'re doing.
I don\\\'t care about consensus, I only brought it up because you asked about it.
Honestly, you don\\\'t get extra benefit of the doubt from me for the way you\\\'ve handled this. You unilaterally changed the page for what is, for all intents and purposes, a WMG (seeing as it directly contradicts the page itself, the wikipedia, and the current page). And you honestly lose massive points for your \\\"CAPS LOCK EQUALS IMPORTANT\\\" bits in your initial post.
Look, we\\\'ve got to agree to disagree in the sense that I think I\\\'ve made good points, you think you\\\'ve made good points. But the tiebreaker here? It isn\\\'t consensus (... though that would be on my side), it\\\'s that the game blatantly says you go to new worlds and never questions that. It never does anything to suggest that that idea is wrong.
I don\\\'t care about consensus, I only brought it up because you asked about it.
Honestly, you don\\\'t get extra benefit of the doubt from me for the way you\\\'ve handled this. You unilaterally changed the page for what is, for all intents and purposes, a WMG (seeing as it directly contradicts the page itself, the wikipedia, and the current page). And you honestly lose massive points for your \\\"CAPS LOCK EQUALS IMPORTANT\\\" bits in your initial post.
Look, we\\\'ve got to agree to disagree in the sense that I think I\\\'ve made good points, you think you\\\'ve made good points. But the tiebreaker here? It isn\\\'t consensus (... though that would be on my side), it\\\'s that the game blatantly says you go to new worlds and never questions that. It never does anything to suggest that that idea is wrong.
