[002]
216.99.32.45
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I dislike this trope...I mean it just reinforce the fact that women are only good at serving men.
to:
9
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
If you looked at the YouTube, Blip, TGWTG comments, and posts on Doug\'s page, you\'ll see this is nowhere near the case. More were complaining about these \
to:
If you looked at the YouTube, Blip, TGWTG comments, and posts on Doug\\\'s page, you\\\'ll see this is nowhere near the case. More were complaining about these \\\"skits\\\"/B-plot (Pearl Harbor)/A-Plot Catalyst(?; Son of the Mask), I have no idea why. I thought both parts were very well executed. There\\\'s clearly an evolution here in the execution of the \\\"new\\\" aspects of the show (Moulin Rouge and Scooby-Doo are examples of how this is a gradual change). There were no \\\"Same Old Jokes\\\". That \\\"same old jokes\\\" argument means all the jokes of the examples where Critic wasn\\\'t involved. The jokes were much better thought out (in Odd Life review, he basically had 4 weeks) in so many ways that there\\\'s no argument the entire claim is moot. DPS means that the protagonist doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'deserve\\\'\\\' to be the protagonist because of his actions. Critic hasn\\\'t done anything to warrant that claim. End of story.
I mean, if the jokes were all the same, why would there be so many crowning moments of funny coming from the Critic?
A YMMV trope addition has to be justified by it being evident through at least a major minority. Unless you can show how major the opinion is, you can only speak for yourself and no one else. If adding a YMMV trope was dependent on the opinions of individuals, then the YMMV page would be endless with tropes that don\\\'t actually belong and long-winded rebuttals and counter-rebuttals. Do you really want that?
I mean, if the jokes were all the same, why would there be so many crowning moments of funny coming from the Critic?
A YMMV trope addition has to be justified by it being evident through at least a major minority. Unless you can show how major the opinion is, you can only speak for yourself and no one else. If adding a YMMV trope was dependent on the opinions of individuals, then the YMMV page would be endless with tropes that don\\\'t actually belong and long-winded rebuttals and counter-rebuttals. Do you really want that?
