[003]
dragonslip
Current Version
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Also there’s a difference in the way you and I are using terms. When I said “meaning” in my first comment I was using it in the sense that you say a specific cause “means” a specific effect like how you say a being kicked in the leg means pain, or to go back to my example how if the problems the couple face are the result of common cultural differences then it means any mix race couple could have the same issues. You lot however seem to be talking about the kind of meaning I would have thought could only be present in a work of art if it’s maker imbues it with it, or in other words the painting can’t be of a dog for the same reason you can’t call a rock formation a sculpture
to:
Also there’s a difference in the way you and I are using terms. When I said “meaning” in my first comment I was using it in the sense that you say a specific cause “means” a specific effect like how you say being kicked in the leg means pain, or to go back to my example how if the problems the couple face are the result of common cultural differences then it means any mix race couple could have the same issues. You lot however seem to be talking about the kind of meaning I would have thought could only be present in a work of art if it’s maker imbues it with it, or in other words the painting can’t be of a dog for the same reason you can’t call a rock formation a sculpture
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
What you seem to be talking about is something like……. Ok I once heard a guy say that the monolith in 2001 could be taken to be representative of a cinema screen turned around and on it side even though Stanley Kubrick says it’s not suppose to be. The difference between the two is that in the later case you are not getting any information or viewpoint from which to create your interpretation from any intelligent sorce other then your own mind and if you’re going to view films and stories that way I don’t see why there even needs to be a film maker or a writer involved? Why not just stick a film camera in front of your house and interpret the random footage from it?
to:
What you seem to be talking about is something like……. Ok I once heard a guy say that the monolith in 2001 could be taken to be representative of a cinema screen turned around and on it side even though Stanley Kubrick says it’s not suppose to be. The difference between the two is that in the later case you are not getting any information or viewpoint from which to create your interpretation from any intelligent source other then your own mind and if you’re going to view films and stories that way I don’t see why there even needs to be a film maker or a writer involved? Why not just stick a film camera in front of your house and interpret the random footage from it?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Also there’s a difference in the way you and I are using terms. When I said “meaning” in my first comment I was using it in the sense that you say a specific cause “means” a specific effect like how you say a being kicked in the leg means pain, or to go back to my example how if the problems the couple face are the result of common cultural differences then it means any mix race couple could have the same issues. You lot however seem to be talking about the kind of meaning I would have thought could only be present in a work of art if it’s maker imbues it with it, or in other words the painting can’t be of a dog for the same reason you can’t call rock formation a sculpture
to:
Also there’s a difference in the way you and I are using terms. When I said “meaning” in my first comment I was using it in the sense that you say a specific cause “means” a specific effect like how you say a being kicked in the leg means pain, or to go back to my example how if the problems the couple face are the result of common cultural differences then it means any mix race couple could have the same issues. You lot however seem to be talking about the kind of meaning I would have thought could only be present in a work of art if it’s maker imbues it with it, or in other words the painting can’t be of a dog for the same reason you can’t call a rock formation a sculpture
