[004]
seg162
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
This page is to present and disprove common misconceptions about (Traditional) Christianity, which are quite numerous. As I see it, if you try to edit it out for word count, it leaves holes if done incorrectly because of insufficient depth. Holes can be an opening for [[{{ConversationInTheMainPage}} Natter]], which is HIGHLY LIKELY on a topic like this (and religion in general). On a side note, this is TvTropes. The tone is supposed to be, as the home page puts it, \
to:
This page is to present and disprove common misconceptions about (Traditional) Christianity, which are quite numerous. As I see it, if you try to edit it out for word count, it leaves holes if done incorrectly because of insufficient depth. Holes can be an opening for [[{{ConversationInTheMainPage}} Natter]], which is almost READY AND PRIMED to happen on a topic like this (and religion in general). On a side note, this is TvTropes. The tone is supposed to be, as the home page puts it, \\\"a buttload more informal\\\" than The Other Wiki. In spite of this, I still understand what you\\\'re saying-- I could only imagine that quite some work would have to be done to keep the page atleast somewhat objective while still retaining the info and depth.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
This page is to present and disprove common misconceptions about (Traditional) Christianity, which are quite numerous. As I see it, if you try to edit it out for word count, it leaves holes if done incorrectly because of insufficient depth. Holes can be an opening for {{ConversationInTheMainPage Natter}}, which is HIGHLY LIKELY on a topic like this (and religion in general). On a side note, this is TvTropes. The tone is supposed to be, as the home page puts it, \
to:
This page is to present and disprove common misconceptions about (Traditional) Christianity, which are quite numerous. As I see it, if you try to edit it out for word count, it leaves holes if done incorrectly because of insufficient depth. Holes can be an opening for [[{{ConversationInTheMainPage}} Natter]], which is HIGHLY LIKELY on a topic like this (and religion in general). On a side note, this is TvTropes. The tone is supposed to be, as the home page puts it, \\\"a buttload more informal\\\" than The Other Wiki. In spite of this, I still understand what you\\\'re saying-- I could only imagine that quite some work would have to be done to keep the page atleast somewhat objective while still retaining the info and depth.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
This page is to present and disprove common misconceptions about (Traditional) Christianity, which are quite numerous. As I see it, if you try to edit it out for word count, it leaves holes if done incorrectly because of insufficient depth. Holes can be an opening for Natter, which is HIGHLY LIKELY on a topic like this (and religion in general). On a side note, this is TvTropes. The tone is supposed to be, as the home page puts it, \
to:
This page is to present and disprove common misconceptions about (Traditional) Christianity, which are quite numerous. As I see it, if you try to edit it out for word count, it leaves holes if done incorrectly because of insufficient depth. Holes can be an opening for {{ConversationInTheMainPage Natter}}, which is HIGHLY LIKELY on a topic like this (and religion in general). On a side note, this is TvTropes. The tone is supposed to be, as the home page puts it, \\\"a buttload more informal\\\" than The Other Wiki. In spite of this, I still understand what you\\\'re saying-- I could only imagine that quite some work would have to be done to keep the page atleast somewhat objective while still retaining the info and depth.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
This page is to present and disprove common misconceptions about (Traditional) Christianity, which are quite numerous. As I see it, if you try to edit it out for word count, it leaves holes if done incorrectly because of insufficient depth. Holes can be an opening for [[{{ConversationInTheMainPage}}Natter]], which is HIGHLY LIKELY on a topic like this (and religion in general). On a side note, this is TvTropes. The tone is supposed to be, as the home page puts it, \
to:
This page is to present and disprove common misconceptions about (Traditional) Christianity, which are quite numerous. As I see it, if you try to edit it out for word count, it leaves holes if done incorrectly because of insufficient depth. Holes can be an opening for Natter, which is HIGHLY LIKELY on a topic like this (and religion in general). On a side note, this is TvTropes. The tone is supposed to be, as the home page puts it, \\\"a buttload more informal\\\" than The Other Wiki. In spite of this, I still understand what you\\\'re saying-- I could only imagine that quite some work would have to be done to keep the page atleast somewhat objective while still retaining the info and depth.
