[003]
doomsday524
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How come this trope went from \
to:
How come this trope went from \\\"FanDumb says dresses=weak, bad\\\" to \\\"shows have women in dresses doing less even if they\\\'re you know, between a trained police officer and a civilian woman\\\".
I\\\'d say the former trope was completely valid and had a big list of the excesses done attacking females for doing anything feminine. What happened to it and why was it replaced by a trope that might be it\\\'s opposite?
I\\\'d say the former trope was completely valid and had a big list of the excesses done attacking females for doing anything feminine. What happened to it and why was it replaced by a trope that might be it\\\'s opposite?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How come this trope went from \
to:
How come this trope went from \\\"FanDumb says dresses=weak, bad\\\" to \\\"shows have feminine women doing less even if they\\\'re you know, a trained police officer and a civilian woman\\\".
I\\\'d say the former trope was completely valid and had a big list of the excesses done attacking females for doing anything feminine. What happened to it and why was it replaced?
I\\\'d say the former trope was completely valid and had a big list of the excesses done attacking females for doing anything feminine. What happened to it and why was it replaced?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How come this trope went from \
to:
How come this trope went from \\\"FanDumb says dresses=weak, bad\\\" to \\\"shows have feminine women doing less\\\".
I\\\'d say the former trope was completely valid and had a big list of the excesses done attacking females for doing anything feminine. What happened to it and why was it replaced?
I\\\'d say the former trope was completely valid and had a big list of the excesses done attacking females for doing anything feminine. What happened to it and why was it replaced?
