[002]
battosaijoe
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"These recommendations are wholly subjective. There are few valid reasons to pull an entry on these special pages. These reasons include:
* No troper name with the entry. [[hottip:*:Names are useful. That is, if I recommend something and it\\\'s not to your taste, you know to avoid my recs in future.]]
* Totally incorrect or missing formatting.
* Dramatic demonstrable total factual accuracy failure — really not so likely in practice. A detailed edit reason would be needed.
We don\\\'t need a second troper to vouch for a rec. I can\\\'t see why an author recommending their own work is unacceptable if they identify themselves as such. If an entry is really an exercise in vitriol, particularly a personal attack on the author that could be worth a mod flag. Edit reasons must be civil. Approach all deletions on the wiki with caution.\\\"
With that said, I believe this issue is closed. There will be no removals for the above listed reasons.
* No troper name with the entry. [[hottip:*:Names are useful. That is, if I recommend something and it\\\'s not to your taste, you know to avoid my recs in future.]]
* Totally incorrect or missing formatting.
* Dramatic demonstrable total factual accuracy failure — really not so likely in practice. A detailed edit reason would be needed.
We don\\\'t need a second troper to vouch for a rec. I can\\\'t see why an author recommending their own work is unacceptable if they identify themselves as such. If an entry is really an exercise in vitriol, particularly a personal attack on the author that could be worth a mod flag. Edit reasons must be civil. Approach all deletions on the wiki with caution.\\\"
With that said, I believe this issue is closed. There will be no removals for the above listed reasons.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"These recommendations are wholly subjective. There are few valid reasons to pull an entry on these special pages. These reasons include:
* No troper name with the entry. [[hottip:*:Names are useful. That is, if I recommend something and it\\\'s not to your taste, you know to avoid my recs in future.]]
* Names are useful. That is, if I recommend something and it\\\'s not to your taste, you know to avoid my recs in future.
* Totally incorrect or missing formatting.
* Dramatic demonstrable total factual accuracy failure — really not so likely in practice. A detailed edit reason would be needed.
We don\\\'t need a second troper to vouch for a rec. I can\\\'t see why an author recommending their own work is unacceptable if they identify themselves as such. If an entry is really an exercise in vitriol, particularly a personal attack on the author that could be worth a mod flag. Edit reasons must be civil. Approach all deletions on the wiki with caution.\\\"
* No troper name with the entry. [[hottip:*:Names are useful. That is, if I recommend something and it\\\'s not to your taste, you know to avoid my recs in future.]]
* Names are useful. That is, if I recommend something and it\\\'s not to your taste, you know to avoid my recs in future.
* Totally incorrect or missing formatting.
* Dramatic demonstrable total factual accuracy failure — really not so likely in practice. A detailed edit reason would be needed.
We don\\\'t need a second troper to vouch for a rec. I can\\\'t see why an author recommending their own work is unacceptable if they identify themselves as such. If an entry is really an exercise in vitriol, particularly a personal attack on the author that could be worth a mod flag. Edit reasons must be civil. Approach all deletions on the wiki with caution.\\\"
