[002]
CrypticMirror
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Going by the TRS threads, and the guidelines on the page, then I\'d say no. If there is a reason as to why a character acts kooky then it isn\'t ambiguous. It\'s not supposed to be explainable. I\'ve removed all the ones that I know don\'t fit the bill, so if you can do more clean up then go for it. Of the ones you\'ve listed there, \
to:
Going by the TRS threads, and the guidelines on the page, then I\\\'d say no. If there is a reason as to why a character acts kooky then it isn\\\'t ambiguous. It\\\'s not supposed to be explainable. I\\\'ve removed all the ones that I know don\\\'t fit the bill, so if you can do more clean up then go for it. Of the ones you\\\'ve listed there, \\\"Twilight Sparkle\\\" (whoever that is) seems to meet the standard going by what is written, but obviously if you are familiar with the fandom then go for it. Maybe leave a note in edit reasons to come to the discussion page before adding back in if someone disagrees, worst case scenario of disagreement we can hash it out here.
If that makes sense, I hope it does, it is so late at night here that it is technically early in the morning now and I\\\'m just off to bed so brain cells are now offlining at an alarming rate.
If that makes sense, I hope it does, it is so late at night here that it is technically early in the morning now and I\\\'m just off to bed so brain cells are now offlining at an alarming rate.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Going by the TRS threads, and the guidelines on the page, then I\'d say no. If there is a reason as to why a character acts kooky then it isn\'t ambiguous. It\'s not supposed to be explainable. I\'ve removed all the ones that I know don\'t fit the bill, so if you can do more clean up then go for it. Of the ones you\'ve listed there, \
to:
Going by the TRS threads, and the guidelines on the page, then I\\\'d say no. If there is a reason as to why a character acts kooky then it isn\\\'t ambiguous. It\\\'s not supposed to be explainable. I\\\'ve removed all the ones that I know don\\\'t fit the bill, so if you can do more clean up then go for it. Of the ones you\\\'ve listed there, \\\"Twilight Sparkle\\\" (whoever that is) seems to meet the standard going by what is written, but obviously if you are familiar with the fandom then go for it. Maybe leave a note in edit reasons to come to the discussion page before adding back in if someone disagrees, worst case scenario of disagreement we can hash it out here.
