[002]
DonaldthePotholer
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I have to wonder how much of the \
to:
I have to wonder how much of the \\\"Real Life\\\" section[[hottip:*:[[FreudianSlip originally typed \\\"x\\\" at a predictable point]]]] [[SquarePegRoundTrope is not this]] but rather ThatCameOutWrong and/or HaveAGayOldTime. Isn\\\'t the difference between this and the former \\\'\\\'intent\\\'\\\'?
The thought occurred to me while reading the entry regarding [[HolierThanThou the Tea Party and Fox News]]. I strongly doubt that people to whom the pothole could be applied would utilize Double Entendres \\\'\\\'intentionally\\\'\\\' (with the exception of RushLimbaugh and others who bill themselves as part commentator, part \\\"entertainer\\\").
EDIT: Added one more pothole...
The thought occurred to me while reading the entry regarding [[HolierThanThou the Tea Party and Fox News]]. I strongly doubt that people to whom the pothole could be applied would utilize Double Entendres \\\'\\\'intentionally\\\'\\\' (with the exception of RushLimbaugh and others who bill themselves as part commentator, part \\\"entertainer\\\").
EDIT: Added one more pothole...
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Bottomline, if you want to repost your \
to:
Bottomline, if you want to repost your \\\"Spirited Away\\\" entry, fine, just provide some sort of example of how his review failed at the research when you post it. I don\\\'t want to see the following.
#His SpiritedAway review.
#SpiritedAway, that is all.
#His SpiritedAway review, the whole thing.
#SpiritedAway, just, SpiritedAway.
Or anything else like that. If you happen to feel the whole thing is a research failure, you can still put that in the entry (in the entry, not here in the discussion page) but also provide an example of some sort of how he failed. I can\\\'t remember if you did that in your reposts and I don\\\'t care at this point. But you didn\\\'t do it in the original and I\\\'ll keep deleting the entry until you do it right. If you want to have the last word. Its yours.
#His SpiritedAway review.
#SpiritedAway, that is all.
#His SpiritedAway review, the whole thing.
#SpiritedAway, just, SpiritedAway.
Or anything else like that. If you happen to feel the whole thing is a research failure, you can still put that in the entry (in the entry, not here in the discussion page) but also provide an example of some sort of how he failed. I can\\\'t remember if you did that in your reposts and I don\\\'t care at this point. But you didn\\\'t do it in the original and I\\\'ll keep deleting the entry until you do it right. If you want to have the last word. Its yours.
