Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History WesternAnimation / MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic

Go To

[006] ThMole Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
First, it doesn\'t fit the Index hierarchy (EnsembleDarkhorse/WesternAnimation is not an index page, and placing MLP:FIM in the folders on the Ensemble Darkhorse page itself doesn\'t add it to the index).
to:
First, it doesn\\\'t fit the Index hierarchy ([[EnsembleDarkhorse/WesternAnimation Ensemble Darkhorse/Western Animation]] is not an index page, and placing MLP:FIM in the folders on the Ensemble Darkhorse page itself doesn\\\'t add it to the index).
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Second, there are entries for the Mane Cast, although the definition of an ensemble darkhorse is [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/EnsembleDarkhorse a side character making up part of the Ensemble, either a non-lead secondary character or a mere Flat Character, who can sometimes become unexpectedly popular with the fandom]].
to:
Second, there are entries for the Mane Cast, although the definition of an ensemble darkhorse is [[EnsembleDarkhorse a side character making up part of the Ensemble, either a non-lead secondary character or a mere Flat Character, who can sometimes become unexpectedly popular with the fandom]].
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
However, if you\'re talking about the stuff on her character page, where her \
to:
However, if you\\\'re talking about the stuff on her character page, where her \\\"I\\\'m into people\\\" self-description is described as a possible definition of pansexuality - I don\\\'t think that is a problem. No one is outright stating that\\\'s the label she uses, simply that\\\'s how others would characterize her based on statements she has made.

I also think that people are confusing the word \\\"genderqueer\\\" for \\\"androgynous.\\\" \\\"Genderqueer\\\" has to do with how you identify, \\\"androgynous\\\" has to do with how you look. Franky clearly identifies as female, she just has a very gender-non-specific appearance. That would make her androgynous, but not genderqueer.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
However, if you\'re talking about the stuff on her character page, where her \
to:
However, if you\\\'re talking about the stuff on her character page, where her \\\"I\\\'m into people\\\" self-description is described as a possible definition of pansexuality - I don\\\'t think that is a problem. No one is outright stating that\\\'s the label she uses, simply that\\\'s how others would characterize it.

I also think that people are confusing the word \\\"genderqueer\\\" for \\\"androgynous.\\\" \\\"Genderqueer\\\" has to do with how you identify, \\\"androgynous\\\" has to do with how you look. Franky clearly identifies as female, she just has a very gender-non-specific appearance. That would make her androgynous, but not genderqueer.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
However, if you\'re talking about the stuff on her character page, where her \
to:
However, if you\\\'re talking about the stuff on her character page, where her \\\"I\\\'m into people\\\" self-description is described as a possible definition of pansexuality - I don\\\'t think that is a problem. No one is outright stating that\\\'s the label she uses, simply that\\\'s how others would characterize it.

I also think that people are confusing the word \\\"genderqueer\\\" for \\\"androgynous.\\\" \\\"Genderqueer\\\" means someone who identifies as neither male nor female, \\\"androgynous\\\" means someone who LOOKS like they could be either gender. Franky clearly identifies as a girl, so she is not genderqueer. She simply has an androgynous appearance.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m fine with removing them if people are stating them with no context. However, I think we should leave in the stuff where people are saying that things she has said \'\'sound\'\' like she is either genderqueer or pansexual - for example, about how her \
to:
If people are claiming outright she is genderqueer and/or pansexual, yeah, we should get rid of that.

However, if you\\\'re talking about the stuff on her character page, where her \\\"I\\\'m into people\\\" self-description is described as a possible definition of pansexuality - I don\\\'t think that is a problem. No one is outright stating that\\\'s the label she uses, simply that\\\'s how others would characterize it.
Top